Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1

    Wikipedia is a very poor source for MGTOW

    Wikipedia is a very poor source for MGTOW

    https://youtu.be/vPkSlkKGuq0

    There have been several people that have used the Wikipedia page as a source of information for MGTOW. To say that Wikipedia is a very bad source is an understatement. The Wikipedia page is more akin to a hit piece rather than an actual source of information. This is the current version of MGTOW on Wikipedia. The video breaks it all down in detail

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_Going_Their_Own_Way








    *Couple of corrections here...MGTOW.cafe when I did some checking I cannot confirm that it is a Muslim Men site. There are a number of men from the Middle East that are MGTOW posting there

    *Mack Lamoureux a man quoted a couple of times in the Wikipedia article NEVER actually spoke or interviewed the man that is pictured (Walking Away Man) at the top of his hit piece.

    There have been several people that have used the Wikipedia page as a source of information for MGTOW. To say that Wikipedia is a very bad source is an understatement

  2. #2
    Senior Member mgtower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Dead body politic, deceased corporate corpse.
    Posts
    2,246
    Reputation
    9283
    Type
    Ghosted by law and order.

    Re: Wikipedia is a very poor source for MGTOW

    It all boils down to Southern Poverty Law Center's radical cunt crusade against us for rubbing their noses in their own shit, they were founded in 1971 at the start of 1'st wave's assault on men.

    Our salty spices make their cunts fart or drip with excitement, depending on the cunt, and how we rub them!

    Their associating MGTOW with incels is just another typical feminist basket weaving one basket to fit all they (key word) "feel" are deplorable. The dangerous thing is that they hold the reigns of "power" and help shape the "cultural revolution" as "feminists" see fit.

    Personally, I must have rubbed their pussies with a wire brush at least 500 times!

    ARRR!
    It's 1939 allover again, and we're the ones being assigned gold stars!

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    1,076
    Reputation
    2747
    Type
    Ghost

    Re: Wikipedia is a very poor source for MGTOW

    As usual when “progressives” or “liberals” or whatever term you wish to use for these shitheads speak about something they don’t like, the manipulation tactics come out.

    The average blue piller would probably see this wiki as a fair and balanced explanation. They get a number of our traits either correct or pretty close and this is part of the manipulation: mix facts with deliberately errant opinion so the unknowing simply believe everything.

    A few examples:

    The MGTOW community has been called a misogynistic group, categorised as part of the alt-right and identified as being "on the borders of the hateful incel community" by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
    I’m sure we have, but accusation does not equate to truth. Leaving this statement standing without counter-argument implies truth, hence manipulation.

    MGTOWs advocate male separatism and believe society has been corrupted by feminism, a view shared with the alt-right.
    So, if I as an atheist share some views with religious doctrine this associates me with them in some way? More manipulation.

    According to Futrelle, the "central MGTOW myth" may be that of the "cock carousel"
    Pure manipulation claiming MGTOW belief to be born in myth even though it is plain to see the truth of the carousel for any that wish to.

    Lamoureux writes that MGTOWs have "a serious problem with feminism".
    Damn right I have a serious problem with feminism, because it’s destructive of lives. The way he puts it would imply that we are wrong to have a problem with it. More manipulation.

    Barb MacQuarrie, Community Director at Centre for Research & Education on Violence against Women & Children at University of Western Ontario, said, MGTOW advocates "have no real ability to identify the global forces that are at work in their life, so they hang the blame on feminists", and show "a complete lack of self-reflection", in the end "reinforcing each other's really distorted perceptions of what's happening in the world".
    Ha. Ha ha. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahaha.

    Sorry, I’ll have to leave the rest to others. I just can’t stop laughing at Babs' comment!
    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Benjamin Franklin

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    1,076
    Reputation
    2747
    Type
    Ghost

    Re: Wikipedia is a very poor source for MGTOW

    O.K. Now that I’ve finished laughing, lets’ look at why I was laughing in the first place!

    "MGTOW advocates have no real ability to identify the global forces that are at work in their life, so they hang the blame on feminists"
    What a load of bollox. This is IMO the whole point of we MGTOW that post online, to try to identify those forces. To call out the simple truths that may, in turn, lead to an understanding of the “global forces at work”. Now, if many of these “simple truths” lead to feminism, then so be it, but that’s not the all of it. There are many more “forces at work” than feminism and we also discuss and debate these.

    MGTOW aren’t about assigning blame just for the fun of it. Well, O.K. sometimes we are, but this is a serious topic and sometimes we need a little light relief.

    We’re more about identifying certain traits common to women that men need to be wary of and understand the repercussions of. It’s about education; letting men know what they’re getting into so they can make the appropriate decision BASED ON INFORMATION SUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE AND REAL LIFE EXPERIENCE, and not a lot of bullshit proverbial sayings that try to keep us reigned in.

    In other words we put the facts out there. If others wish to listen to reason then that makes us happy, if not then we’re just as happy. We’ve said what needs to be said and if you wish to ignore it then more fool you. You reap what you sew. What do I care if you fuck up your life?

    show "a complete lack of self-reflection"
    Wow. What a statement. Surely it is the ability to reflect on our previous decisions and actions that brought us here; the realisation of the fact that making the same mistakes over and over and expecting different results is a form of madness (often attributed to Albert Einstein).

    But after a while that mirror of self-reflection needs to be realigned. If one has any modicum of intelligence and reflection they begin to ask the question WHY? This is where we come in. We try to answer this question by exposing the traits of women and exposing men to the idea that women often see us as little more than a resource in a myriad of different ways: “What have you done for me lately?”

    "reinforcing each other's really distorted perceptions of what's happening in the world".
    All groups reinforce perceptions, distorted or otherwise. This is a simple fact. I cannot speak for MGTOW on other sites, but here on this site we back up our observations; sometimes with statistics, other times with personal experiences. Either way we put our views out there for others to criticise, and by God do we get criticised.

    Not only do we get criticised by the world at large but we also criticise each other. How then, if this is true, do we end up with a “really distorted perception”?

    Put a post up on THIS site, you better be able to back up your claims.

    In summary:

    There are those out there that claim to be MGTOW but have no skin in the game. They have seen a few vids and have read about the red pill and they think they know, but they don’t. They go online and they interact espousing the MGTOW way as a solution. But often they miss the point because they are early in their journey or, worse, they are merely agitators that seek attention.

    MGTOW is not a solution to world problems; it is a solution to individual problems. It is a reaction to a world that wants to TELL us who we are rather than allowing us to BE who we are, a reaction to unjust laws that deny us access to our offspring, a reaction to unjust laws that make us pay financially, a reaction to the mad notions that women have and seek to make us implement for no good reason, a reaction to the constant inane chattering, a reaction to being controlled and manipulated…

    We are a reaction.

    We are a reaction to YOU!

    How about YOU spending some time reflecting on how you treat others, men AND women?

    Do you know who you are? And if you do, are you happy with who you are?

    I do and I am.

    ‘nuff said.
    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Benjamin Franklin

  5. #5
    Senior Member stanmsl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    THE ENGLISH COUNTRYSIDE
    Posts
    175
    Reputation
    1048
    Type
    Bachelor

    Re: Wikipedia is a very poor source for MGTOW

    Some self-identified MGTOWs see women as
    hypergamous
    and manipulative. According to Futrelle, the "central MGTOW myth" may be that of the "cock carousel": the idea that women spend their youth "flitting from alpha male to alpha male in an endless utopia of casual sex [...] Meanwhile, the overwhelming majority of men in their teens and early 20s live in a parched sexual desert, scorned by women".
    [14][15]
    In
    Digital Environments
    , Lin writes:
    Hardly a myth when there's overwhelming data from multiple online dating sites showing roughly 80% of the messages from women go to roughly 20% of the men.
    Correct me if I'm wrong here but didn't OK Cupid delete this from their own blog because they didn't want to put men off signing up.
    Men are becoming MGTOW by the millions, most without ever having heard the term. They are simply doing what all living organisms finding themselves in a toxic environment do. They adapt to it or remove themselves from it. Females are not liking either the adaptations or the removal.

    FACEBOOK PAGE, TWITTER FEED


Similar Threads

  1. Wikipedia: GirlWritesWhat = Youtube nobody
    By smallbitsoffire in forum Random (Non-MGTOW subjects)
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: January 19, 2018, 9:25 PM
  2. Wikipedia and politics
    By Mr Wombat in forum Lounge
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: April 5, 2016, 1:24 AM
  3. Feminists in Wikipedia
    By smallbitsoffire in forum Lounge
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: June 4, 2015, 3:08 AM
  4. SJWs attack Open Source Software
    By Parker in forum Action
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: June 2, 2015, 12:17 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •