You did. In
Post #10. So did the member who said, "It is ALL cops." which prompted my response.
So they are not all like that? Now you're agreeing with me. That's all I'm saying to anyone who says they are all the same. Thousands of cops, millions of police transactions that occur without a hitch. You don't hear about those.
Gee, your agreeableness did not last long. There you go with that "all" again. A pretty extreme thing to say. You don't know that. You aren't there when reforms take place that aren't advertised. We hear the things brought to us through the news or through others or through personal experience. Notice I did not say there are no need for reforms. I'm saying it is reasonable to acknowledge there are things unseen. Good things, too.
Also, any individual cop may have spoken up to his/her superior about a change needed but it takes more than that to effect change. In the mean time, this good cop has to carry out his/her instructions until the change happens, if it does. If it doesn't happen, we cannot say a finger wasn't lifted. Well, you'll say that, I suppose, in your omniscience.
Comparing to an army implies you once again see them as a monolith. Just sayin'.
Sounds good to me. The alternative is to watch cops eat away at their cohesion and camaraderie, reducing their effectiveness when they are good. Nobody wants that except liberals who want crime, I suppose. No speeding tickets? A perquisite of the job. My job had perks, too, not available to the general public.
So, you're a big believer of a cop taking the law into his own hands after you've complained about that very thing here. You want due process unless it gets in the way of a desired outcome.
All I've been saying is it is not reasonable to paint cops with a broad brush. My message on that has been consistent. Your message, not so much.