Thread: Lia Thomas, according to Steve Sailer

Ouch! According to Steve Sailer, it's no a coincidence that transgender athletes are the most lanky, raw, square-jawed, tall, muscle-y, aggressive, unfeminine "women" imaginable. Lia Toamas' problem (interestingly, Wikipedia doesn't mention "her" deadname. You'd think an encyclopedia would) was never that he was a woman trapped in a man's body. It was that he was a megalomaniac who couldn't bear the fact that he kept losing races.

Will anybody ever succeed in communicating to impressionable adolescents that these famous ex-men weren’t really always the opposite sex on the inside, that in fact they tend to be excessive examples of stereotypically male traits likes ambition, aggression, and megalomania? When the ex-men tell you they knew there was something different about them as a child, that they could sense that they weren’t like the other boys, what they are actually recalling is that they felt the other boys were their inferiors, that they were superior males with special capacities like the heroes of Heinlein sci-fi novels.
For example, the reason Thomas wants so much to beat women in the pool is likely because his innate sense of superiority was being invalidated by his being a constant loser in male swimming. So, he undertook a course of superiority-complex-affirming therapy by beating women.

Article here: https://www.takimag.com/article/the-truth-about-pervs/

I find it encouraging the article refers to these people as perverts. Maybe that's one small indicator of an upcoming rollback. I think another will be the first high-profile civil lawsuit against everyone involved in the surgical mutilation of a once-whole human being, including all the enablers who actually advised the complainant to proceed with those "operations." If there were ever fertile ground for the legal profession, this is it. (I'm thinking along the lines of the asbestos and insect-killer lawsuits.) It'll be a good test of whether signed release forms actually do protect people who perform physical mutilations.

Originally Posted by kru-kut

I find it encouraging the article refers to these people as perverts. Maybe that's one small indicator of an upcoming rollback. I think another will be the first high-profile civil lawsuit against everyone involved in the surgical mutilation of a once-whole human being, including all the enablers who actually advised the complainant to proceed with those "operations." If there were ever fertile ground for the legal profession, this is it. (I'm thinking along the lines of the asbestos and insect-killer lawsuits.) It'll be a good test of whether signed release forms actually do protect people who perform physical mutilations.

"they talked me into it" will be the common denominator when the future lawsuits start flying, in laymen's terms it's called "enticing a child" and it's a criminal offense.

The oil and water of fiction and reality are distilling before our eyes, we know right from wrong and that separates us from the perverts, thereby making us salty and offensive to those that dwell in the darkness they know and love so much. We can no more deny universal truths than we can flap our arms and fly! Gender is incontrovertible, it's not a matter of choice, it's a matter of fact!

Originally Posted by kru-kut

I find it encouraging the article refers to these people as perverts.

Steve Sailer has been around for some time - a well known badthinker and hatespeaker. He's responsible for Sailer's Law of Female Journalism:

The most heartfelt articles by female journalists tend to be demands that social values be overturned in order that, Come the Revolution, the journalist herself will be considered hotter-looking.

The ✂metoo lawsuits will reach back in time too

Some US sports outfit (probably college) that rides herd on swimmers recently banned trans gender athletes. So not everyone likes tranny's stinking up the show.

Well, lookee here...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-SUES-NHS.html

Quoting from the article:

A young British man who had his genitals removed during gender reassignment surgery is suing the NHS over the operation in a historic legal action.

He complains that doctors did not warn him of the drastic outcome of the body-altering surgery which has left him infertile, incontinent and feeling like a ‘sexual eunuch’.

He said on Twitter yesterday: ‘The minute I woke up from surgery, I knew I had made the biggest mistake of my life.’

Just wanted to add this: I see mutilation surgery becoming a thing of the past not because of its inarguable moral depravity, but because insurance companies will refuse to write malpractice policies for doctors and hospitals that perform these Mengele-like experiments on human beings. In other words, doctors and hospitals will stop doing these mutilations based not on morality but on a business decision. It's a sad way to put things right again, but I'll take it.

Originally Posted by kru-kut

Well, lookee here...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-SUES-NHS.html

Quoting from the article:

A young British man who had his genitals removed during gender reassignment surgery is suing the NHS over the operation in a historic legal action.

He complains that doctors did not warn him of the drastic outcome of the body-altering surgery which has left him infertile, incontinent and feeling like a ‘sexual eunuch’.

He said on Twitter yesterday: ‘The minute I woke up from surgery, I knew I had made the biggest mistake of my life.’

All I can say to that dude is Sucks 2 B U!