Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Senior Member mgtower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    1,159
    Reputation
    5941
    Type
    Ghost

    NRA deemed a "domestic terrorist organization" by SF CA.

    In the land of human monkeys shitting on the sidewalks is okay but if your dog does it you're fined, San Francisco board declares NRA a "Domestic Terrorist Organization".

    Does this mean SF police that are members are now terrorists? Sounds about right to me, given the sidewalk shitting policy. They need good earthquake and tsunami, wash all the sidewalks clean.

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/09/04/san-francisco-supervisors-nra-domestic-terrorist-organization/2210973001/

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    342
    Reputation
    848
    Type
    Ghost

    Re: NRA deemed a "domestic terrorist organization" by SF CA.

    Quote Originally Posted by mgtower View Post
    In the land of human monkeys shitting on the sidewalks is okay but if your dog does it you're fined, San Francisco board declares NRA a "Domestic Terrorist Organization".

    Does this mean SF police that are members are now terrorists? Sounds about right to me, given the sidewalk shitting policy. They need good earthquake and tsunami, wash all the sidewalks clean.

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/09/04/san-francisco-supervisors-nra-domestic-terrorist-organization/2210973001/
    Coming from a place where private gun ownership is heavily regulated, most of us cannot understand the fascination U.S. citizens have with firearms and the sheer number of mass shootings leaves us totally bewildered as to why something, anything, has not been done about the situation. And as to the notion of having a gun in your home, that seems like an invitation for disaster. After all we all have periods in our lives when we just lose the plot altogether.

    However.

    I remember seeing an interview a while back, on FOX News I believe, where a pro N.R.A. contributor explained it simply as a cultural difference no different from the food we eat or the clothes we wear. It is simply part of the makeup of many U.S. citizens. It is part of the history of your country and I can accept that.

    I also recall a scene for a T.V. show where one of the characters says something like: Im not a big fan of guns in general, but if everyone else has one I want the biggest, baddest one I can get my hands on. Makes sense to me.

    There is also the argument of if you take the guns away from all the law abiding citizens all that does is leave all the guns in the hands of criminals. Im not too sure about the long-term efficacy of this argument but it certainly makes sense in the short term.

    In short, from my point of view the jury is still out.

    Getting back to the O.P. though, If the N.R.A. has been declared a domestic terrorist organisation does that mean all members are going to be rounded up and jailed? Who are the San Francisco Board of Supervisors? Are they a branch of government or a group of SJWs who have given themselves an important sounding name? I think that this may be an important distinction.
    "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

    All we can do is keep ourselves from all those who don't deserve it. Dave Matthes

  3. #3
    Senior Member Hoppes#9's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    The Carolinas
    Posts
    129
    Reputation
    505
    Type
    just me..

    Re: NRA deemed a "domestic terrorist organization" by SF CA.

    I do not believe there are ANY agencies stupid enough to try to disarm 183 million gun owners.
    What will happen is they will constantly chip away at the 2nd article with bull shit ordinances like "Red Flag" act.
    Now understand there will be more "staged" shootings.....even more so the closer we get to the election cycle. There will be an increase in Politicians and Hollywood Pretenders claiming the end of the world as we know it, if the guns are not banned . There will be another round of idiotic bills brought to the Senate floor for out right confiscation of Fire arms.. And at the end of the day,...Americans will still have their guns!

    Now bleeding heart liberal do-gooders, SJW's and hideous Commies can argue and threaten all they want about gun control.....But I ask you this,...who will be brave enough to physically come and take them?
    Lard ass'd cops at the donut shop? LOL . SWAT teams? a few may try and end up in body bags.
    The Military? again LOL.

    What it would amount to is a small force attempting to disarm the largest standing army in the world.
    The great State of Pennsylvania has more registered gun owners and hunters than the US Army has members, and that is just One State out of 50.
    Notice I said "Registered gun owners". A 2015 ish GOA report states actual "registered" and non registered owners in the CONUS may be several times greater than previously assumed.
    The Govt. knows outright confiscation is a suicide mission. They will bluster and they will attempt to bully good people into turning them in......a small segment may do that. The Vast majority will not.

    At the most,..as of today,..all they can do is slowly chip away at the 2nd article...and possibly outright ban civilian purchases of ammo. Too little...much Too late.

    I am not an NRA member never will be....but to be labeled a "Terrorist" by a Govt., would put a person in good standings with the likes of George Washington, P. Henry, S. Adams and other notable "terrorists" of that day.


    ps. Sorry for going off topic here..

  4. #4
    Senior Member mgtower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    1,159
    Reputation
    5941
    Type
    Ghost

    Re: NRA deemed a "domestic terrorist organization" by SF CA.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jackoff View Post
    Coming from a place where private gun ownership is heavily regulated, most of us cannot understand the fascination U.S. citizens have with firearms and the sheer number of mass shootings leaves us totally bewildered as to why something, anything, has not been done about the situation. And as to the notion of having a gun in your home, that seems like an invitation for disaster. After all we all have periods in our lives when we just lose the plot altogether.

    However.

    I remember seeing an interview a while back, on FOX News I believe, where a pro N.R.A. contributor explained it simply as a cultural difference no different from the food we eat or the clothes we wear. It is simply part of the makeup of many U.S. citizens. It is part of the history of your country and I can accept that.

    I also recall a scene for a T.V. show where one of the characters says something like: “I’m not a big fan of guns in general, but if everyone else has one I want the biggest, baddest one I can get my hands on.” Makes sense to me.

    There is also the argument of if you take the guns away from all the law abiding citizens all that does is leave all the guns in the hands of criminals. I’m not too sure about the long-term efficacy of this argument but it certainly makes sense in the short term.

    In short, from my point of view the jury is still out.

    Getting back to the O.P. though, If the N.R.A. has been declared a domestic terrorist organisation does that mean all members are going to be rounded up and jailed? Who are the San Francisco Board of Supervisors? Are they a branch of government or a group of SJWs who have given themselves an important sounding name? I think that this may be an important distinction.
    In a nation of people where once upon a time the citizen was the soldier and charged with all responsibility and accountability under their god given rights, we were adults at one time and now lost that heritage to a philosophy of government over citizen, not citizen over government ruled by a constitution where the citizen has rights, responsibilities, and accountabilities to their own efforts or lack thereof. Now things are terribly different, even foreign to our constitution and aggressively moving further away to a world of utter confusion where the individual is sacrificed for the "alleged" good of the whole.

    There was a time when men could walk in a hardware store and buy Nobel's invention called "Dynamite" DuPont was one of the manufactures. The liberal mass media is all crickets when guns are used to stop crimes and murders by law abiding citizens, all you hear about is what they tell you, they don't mention the incidences where guns were used to stop criminals and home invasions. A nation with firearms is a nation where the majority of people respect one another. I had a road warrior "foreigner" chase me through the city onto the interstate and into a park before I lost him, the chase started when he raised a gun, had we been armed we could have shot out his radiator, but instead we had to endanger the general public in order to preserve our safety.

    Gun control gives the powers that be, absolute power and authority, one cannot script their own life under these conditions, it's often conscripted by dictate to him at the end of a gun.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    342
    Reputation
    848
    Type
    Ghost

    Re: NRA deemed a "domestic terrorist organization" by SF CA.

    Hmm. What do you think would happen if the second amendment was repealed tomorrow morning and the holding of private firearms was made illegal for the majority of citizens? I don’t for a second believe that this would happen, but what if?

    I don’t have much of an understanding of U.S. law, but wouldn’t that have to be done by referendum? That means that that a majority of those that vote would be in favour? And as for those that don’t vote on the issue, they probably couldn’t care much about it and the majority of those would comply. This means that (criminals aside) in short order more than half the population would be willing to give up their arms to the powers that be.

    By Hoppes#9:

    What it would amount to is a small force attempting to disarm the largest standing army in the world.
    Is this what would happen? Our force against your force? I doubt it. What is more likely is that security forces would raid individual homes while the occupants were otherwise occupied, while at work for example. Afterwards these people would be arrested, charged and convicted. This would be widely televised striking fear into hearts of those that haven’t complied. Add to that the fear of neighbours or ‘friends’ turning you in, well… Many will stand their ground, but many more will succumb for fear of the same thing happening to them.

    Given enough time the honest law abiding citizens that retained their arms would be drastically reduced and given their lack of cohesion and organisation they would be no match for the U.S. military machine. They would be picked off one by one. Not a pleasant thought I grant you, there would no doubt be a LOT of bloodshed, but I believe the matrix would prevail in the end.

    By mgtower:

    A nation with firearms is a nation where the majority of people respect one another.
    So, you believe that respect can come from the barrel of a gun? Fear is a type of respect and I’ll give you that, but I respect you and your opinions and it has nothing to do with fearing that you might shoot me if I disagree with you. Having grown up with a gun being pointed at me on almost a daily basis I can assure you that I had absolutely zero respect for the people holding the guns. Fear yes, respect no.

    Just in case anyone is thinking I’m just another liberal that has the dream of ‘why can’t we all get along?’ nothing could be further from the truth. We not only have a need but a duty to protect ourselves from the onslaught of conformatism. Nor am I anti-gun. Political correctness can go fuck itself as far as I’m concerned. Confrontation shows us our vulnerabilities and weaknesses and allows us to address those issues. Individuality in thought and deed is what makes us great.
    "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

    All we can do is keep ourselves from all those who don't deserve it. Dave Matthes

  6. #6
    Senior Member Joetech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    705
    Reputation
    2208
    Type
    Bachelor

    Re: NRA deemed a "domestic terrorist organization" by SF CA.

    Having been born and raised in a country that was founded by a bloody revolution against what was (and may still be) the most tyranical empire of the world, I'm a bit nervous, to say the least, when any government starts wanting to take away my weapons. Why, I ask, are they suddenly afraid of me? Are we turning into China?
    "Don't follow in my footsteps. I stepped in something."

  7. #7
    Senior Member MGTOWFOREVER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    873
    Reputation
    4426
    Type
    Living on my own terms

    Re: NRA deemed a "domestic terrorist organization" by SF CA.

    Of course its a terrorist organization! The liberals hate anyone who does things LEGALLY! But hey its okay to give guns to people that hate us! What I don't understand about liberals is they want to save the world but hate their own. They don't get their way then it's a shit storm but preach love, equality, and peace. *rolls eyes*

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    641
    Reputation
    4580
    Type
    Ghost

    Re: NRA deemed a "domestic terrorist organization" by SF CA.

    The NRA is a terrorist organization, but Antifa and its back-door funders are not? Rrrrrright... Bizarro World.

    Again, you can not expect reason from libs. These people are swine: they have brains that are incapable of rational thought and logic. Every one of them has a mental disorder. You can not reason with or debate with people who have mental disorders.

  9. #9

    Re: NRA deemed a "domestic terrorist organization" by SF CA.

    As far as government is concerned:
    An armed man is a citizen.
    An unarmed man is a subject.

    Even if the government is not headed by a king or a queen,
    an unarmed man is "subject" to government's every whim.
    An escort is a woman you occasionally financially support only when she has sex with you.

    A date is a woman you occasionally financially support in the hope she will have sex with you.

    A wife is a woman you constantly financially support even when she is not having sex with you.

    An ex-wife is a woman you constantly financially support with alimony so she can have sex......with someone else.


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: February 12, 2019, 4:45 AM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: August 27, 2016, 10:33 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 29, 2015, 8:06 PM
  4. Child abuse by female "domestic partners"
    By FapMaster in forum News Articles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 23, 2014, 10:15 AM
  5. "Controlling behaviour" is "domestic abuse".
    By Freeychromosome in forum News Articles
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: March 16, 2014, 1:54 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •