Thread: Women do not love men.

Originally Posted by MGTOWFOREVER

Women don't love. They use. They will always monkey branch. A woman's love is conditional. Which means opportunistic. They will only "love" you if they can control and use you. She will then monkey branch without any remorse.

I love how these beautiful words you have written are becoming common knowledge to men. Of course we can't help all of them but at least a lot of us are waking up to this sham.

Originally Posted by sam luis obispo

Children love puppies.

Women love children. (Mostly their own children, but not always.)

Men love women.

I look at it this way,

1. Men love women

2. Women love shoes

Originally Posted by Chris007

I look at it this way,

1. Men love women

2. Women love shoes

That's not the way I look at it,

1. Me love motorcycles, airplanes, muscle cars, god, and Salomon skis.

2. Women love shoes...

I was talking about emotional capacity in relationships between men and women

Originally Posted by Chris007

I was talking about emotional capacity in relationships between men and women

What's that?

Originally Posted by Chris007

I look at it this way,

1. Men love women

2. Women love shoes

That's not how I see it either. The way I see it is:

1. I love health supplements, computer tech, 3D puzzles, and man caves
2. Women love to bitch and complain

Originally Posted by ResidentEvil7

That's not how I see it either. The way I see it is:

1. I love health supplements, computer tech, 3D puzzles, and man caves
2. Women love to bitch and complain, press charges, file complaints, and lie through their teeth!

^^^Amended^^^

On the eve of Independence Day in America, I content myself with the knowledge that one of my forefathers probably shot one of Spooky's forefathers.

I'm out. Peace.
- Owen, 07.03.2022

Originally Posted by ResidentEvil7

I found the video Manfred was referring to:

Thanks, Big John and Spetsnaz, I learned a lot from them.
Now that MGTOW is mainstream (regardless of the censorship ) something was lost: the quality of the first days.

Originally Posted by ResidentEvil7

I found the video Manfred was referring to:

Originally Posted by OwenWentFullMGTOW

It is true that a woman's experience with romantic love is very different from a man's. Which is probably an evolutionary thing.

For a man to commit himself, his life and his resources to a woman, he needs a certain amount of idealism. Which is where these insipid ideas of romantic love, "she's The One", "soulmates" and other horse shit come from. A man's evolutionary success depended on his ability to overwhelm his logical faculties with giddy lovey-dovey bullshit when it comes to mate-selection.

But for a woman to commit herself, her life and her womb to a man, she needs a certain amount of pragmatism. "He's basically acceptable on a genetic level and his resources will provide for my future children." A woman's evolutionary success depended on her ability to be a mercenary when it comes to mate-selection.

I've always found it revealing that men are pragmatic about everything except love while women are idealistic about everything except love. Until recently, that is. Lately, with romantic issues, men are becoming the pragmatic ones and women are becoming the idealistic ones. We're already seeing the results of such warped trends.

Point being that women are programmed to have a fundamentally different interaction with romantic love than men. Women love men depending on X or because of Y. Whereas men love women in a sacrificial type of way.

Yes, evolutionary biology does explain female behavior, but it also explains why a man, after investing his heart and resources on a woman, does not take well of her infidelities, or bad behaviour.

And by evolutionary biology this man would become violence.

It is in our nature.

We became civilized, and men are able to control their nature. Most men... Those that fail to do so are called criminals.

Now men are indoctrinated from babies to serve as good slaves to the ginocentric plantation suppressing their physical supremacy, and brainwashed with doublespeak about women's actions.

So, men's nature is repressed, women's nature supported.

This is second level red pills.

The first level red pill is to wake-up from the blue pill idea that women love men as men love women.

That is a hard deprogramming to do. Waking up from the matrix is hard.

I remember this video back when MGTOW had a sub reddit fourm... good stuff
What i think is important to remember is that women do not love men as men do not love women... things like this simply are criteria that changes from person to person. To put it bluntly love in all forms is conditional, this is the reason i believe m.g.t.o.w is freedom.
Freedom from condition .

Originally Posted by Manfred

Now men are indoctrinated from babies to serve as good slaves to the ginocentric plantation suppressing their physical supremacy, and brainwashed with doublespeak about women's actions.

So, men's nature is repressed, women's nature supported.

I always said that but nobody else seemed to pick up on it. We are told to basically cater to her and kiss her ass. Did you ever notice the women who gave us the advice of "be nice to girls and buy them gifts" never listened to their own advice? Do as I say , not as I do. All their boyfriends treated them like shit but they were crazy in love. They treated the good hearted guys as weak and tossed them out like trash.

Originally Posted by MGTOWFOREVER

Did you ever notice the women who gave us the advice of "be nice to girls and buy them gifts" never listened to their own advice?

Unfortunately these women were our mothers.

Society teaches the same "white knight" stuff to young boys. A man's role is as it was 2 or 3 centuries ago, they just keep adding stuff and taking from women's role.

Men have to protect women and be a gentleman when it fits women's fantasies, but also share the house work and what traditionally was exclusively women's work.
Women do not take men's work like gardening and house repair.

Men have to "respect" women's independence, opinions and share the decision-making. But women make demands of men's time, change men's lifestyle, and end up taking over the decision-making.
Women have no requirement to respect anything about men, in fact learn early that men deserve no such thing.

Men have to put their assets and future livelihood on making a marriage contract, but women only risk extracting said resources when unilaterally breaking such contracts.

Men were saddle with more demands, less rights and no cannot have expectations from women.
Women were released from demands from men and expect everything in return for nothing.

On the eve of Independence Day in America, I content myself with the knowledge that one of my forefathers probably shot one of Spooky's forefathers.

I'm out. Peace.
- Owen, 07.03.2022

Originally Posted by OwenWentFullMGTOW

Speaking of which, found this little beauty the other day.

I am not surprised one bit. Nothing will ever surprise me about the evil rotten nature of women.

Originally Posted by MGTOWFOREVER

There were thousands jumping on this bandwagon when it started. There were some pure heifers posting Me Too when everyone knew no one had ever done anything to their big asses. The Depp verdict hopefully put a nail in this Me Too thing.

Originally Posted by OwenWentFullMGTOW

It is true that a woman's experience with romantic love is very different from a man's. Which is probably an evolutionary thing.

For a man to commit himself, his life and his resources to a woman, he needs a certain amount of idealism. Which is where these insipid ideas of romantic love, "she's The One", "soulmates" and other horse shit come from. A man's evolutionary success depended on his ability to overwhelm his logical faculties with giddy lovey-dovey bullshit when it comes to mate-selection.

But for a woman to commit herself, her life and her womb to a man, she needs a certain amount of pragmatism. "He's basically acceptable on a genetic level and his resources will provide for my future children." A woman's evolutionary success depended on her ability to be a mercenary when it comes to mate-selection.

I've always found it revealing that men are pragmatic about everything except love while women are idealistic about everything except love. Until recently, that is. Lately, with romantic issues, men are becoming the pragmatic ones and women are becoming the idealistic ones. We're already seeing the results of such warped trends.

Point being that women are programmed to have a fundamentally different interaction with romantic love than men. Women love men depending on X or because of Y. Whereas men love women in a sacrificial type of way.

Men becoming pragmatic is a threat to many powerful interests.

Imagine if diamonds lost their value, except for industrial uses?

So many industrial, political, and social systems, and social mores depend upon men simping or becoming plow horses.

Originally Posted by GDash

There were thousands jumping on this bandwagon when it started. There were some pure heifers posting Me Too when everyone knew no one had ever done anything to their big asses. The Depp verdict hopefully put a nail in this Me Too thing.

Not gonna happen. METOO will always be around because people are quick to believe a "damsel in distress". The older I get the more I believe a woman's tears are more dangerous than a bullet.