Thread: This is what it's making them feel like...

The internet isn't the issue.

The issue is the fascination/idolization of monarchy that is embedded in our society.

This is what a woman feels like when she has millions of likes and attention on social media....







The more attention and power she gains, the more she feels like the queen in pictures above; just a queen of a different cloth...


Wait. Notice how western society raises their young girls..."Come here princess. "Anything for you princess."

Giving her dolls like these...-->



She grows up raised to expect to be treated like a princess and they never grow out of that.

But wait there's more....

Notice how we feed into it on social media.

Every Queen has peasants that idealize them and serve them.

How is that different from simps idolizing & worshiping huge porn and female influencers?

You think you are just liking a photo and watching their content but in actuality you are playing right into their narcissistic role playing game of king and queen and it is even more true if you are doing so with a "power couple" or influencers who are in a relationship and share content with the public eyes.

The pic below is what "social media relationships" make them feel like....



You are the peasant looking at, & worshiping the king and queen everytime you engage into a post that involves another couple that is posting for attention on their relationship.

Ask yourself this. What reason would a couple have to post them kissing and showing affection to each other, for the world world to see?

Isn't a relationship suppose to be just for them?

The only reason is what I stated above. To reach that desire they have inside of them since a kid.

To feel like a king and queen...and they need you peasant to help them feel like it.

Death to the fascination/idolization of monarchy of any kind.

Death to the fascination/idolization of monarchy of any kind.

Death to the fascination/idolization of monarchy of any kind.

Do you think simps suffer from princess syndrome in some way also? Like how spoiled and "special" have you been made to feel for thinking some half naked woman wanting attention will pick YOU out of thousands of men because you said "hey beautiful"?

Originally Posted by Edwardhaskell

Do you think simps suffer from princess syndrome in some way also? Like how spoiled and "special" have you been made to feel for thinking some half naked woman wanting attention will pick YOU out of thousands of men because you said "hey beautiful"?

Absolutely. Monarchy is rooted deep in our society.

Peasants would have a heart attack if the queen use to even look their way.

Not much has changed.

There must be a ideological battle to get rid of all influence of what was and still is of monarchy.

America has fought a war to get rid of this shit but it has creeped back into our great nation.

American Revolutionary War II must happen ideologically. Especially in ways we are influenced through technology like social media.

The problem is that she's from different generation of women. Yeah, she was an actual queen. Beside Queen Elizabeth, we have common women today that are pretending to be queen; those common women that were raised in Disney land fantasy, they will either be stuck in a fantasy or realized the hard way, that the men (Chads/Tyrone) they wants, don't want them after using those women.

But it's becoming rare now that women are even self-aware about the men they pick.

And if they are, they hate choosing low breed men, because they hit the wall.

And if Queen Elizabeth was self-aware, she wouldn't let her sons date sleazy women.

And I don't respect Prince Harry. He was total idiot for knocking up and marrying that disgusting post-carousal rider actress that called Megan.

That Prince Harry should make nice and ask for forgiveness to return to England, because he's not welcome here in my country. And he should take Megan with him.

A woman is born with value. A man's value is created.

Women are raised that they are always right and beautiful. Men are raised to simp. "You be nice to her, don't hit her back, take her on dates, buy her the thing she mentions, etc". I was even punished based on lies. "Stick your tongue out. It's black so that means you are lying". I later found out that it never changes color cause I am a "tell it like it is " smart ass. Wouldn't it be so easy if cops can just say "stick your tongue out" to see if someone is guilty or not?

Women are raised that they deserve the best no matter what. Men are always asked what we bring to the table. WE ARE THE FREAKING TABLE , THE FLOOR THAT SUPPORTS IT, THE FOOD ON IT, THE ROOF OVER IT, ETC.

It took me to around 29 to see the truth. I was one angry MFer to I realized that no matter what it will never change so I just take care of myself.

I would also like to see it be recognized or at least examined that girls are trained from a young age to expect money to come to them from others, especially from men, like Daddy, as a solution to their problems or just as an expectation of how things are supposed to be. These young girls grow up to be women who assume a transfer of wealth/assets is a right. Society, which includes the taxes paid by men, is expected to fund their life choices, etc. Abortion is just one that comes to mind quickly but of course there is child support and alimony expectations, and only as long as it's the man paying. And then you got the tons of men who throw money at women for doing nothing, including sites like onlyfans of which I have not watched so I'm going from hearsay on that.

How can so many women not think they deserve Other People's Money? It's how things are done.

Perhaps others can expand on this better than I'm doing here.

Watch who you follow. Double agents are everywhere. (video below)

There is only two types of core fundamental governmental ideologies. Monarchy and American. Stay American.

No one is above anyone. There are no kings and queens of any kind and influencers and the current model of most social media sites feed into British monarchical influence.

The music industry and social media really elevates the British monarchical influence model.

America use to be about industrial manufacturing and professionalism. Not a lot of cameras..only when needed. Just men who worked hard getting their businesses off the ground and maintained it.

If you were worshipped like a "king" or known it was because of that. That's as close as we need to be to any kind of monarchical influence.

Now we have a society that is headed for a form of some kind of virtual social credit "likes" system that is rooted in monarchy.

Originally Posted by manaloneforever

The issue is the fascination/idolization of monarchy that is embedded in our society.

This is what a woman feels like when she has millions of likes and attention on social media....


The more attention and power she gains, the more she feels like the queen in pictures above; just a queen of a different cloth...


Wait. Notice how western society raises their young girls..."Come here princess. "Anything for you princess."

Giving her dolls like these...-->



She grows up raised to expect to be treated like a princess and they never grow out of that.

But wait there's more....

Every Queen has peasants that idealize them and serve them.

Her Wedding Day.

-She is the centre of attention, it's her day!!!
-She gets to dress up in a white dress often ballroom style. (White is signify purity... Or virginity)
-She sits at the "Head Table" looking over the guests that she invited. (peasants)
-The wedding and everything leading up to it, to the honeymoon after is stuffed with tradition.
-The photos are often "PhotoShopped" to appear the wedding was even more fairytale than it was.
-They all want that "White Wedding". The vows are meant to be the most important part, will be forgotten as soon as the words leave her mouth...
-Often the cost of the day will be put on credit that will take years to pay.
-The younger she is the bigger the wedding...

Originally Posted by RustyNuts

Her Wedding Day.

-She is the centre of attention, it's her day!!!
-She gets to dress up in a white dress often ballroom style. (White is signify purity... Or virginity)
-She sits at the "Head Table" looking over the guests that she invited. (peasants)
-The wedding and everything leading up to it, to the honeymoon after is stuffed with tradition.
-The photos are often "PhotoShopped" to appear the wedding was even more fairytale than it was.
-They all want that "White Wedding". The vows are meant to be the most important part, will be forgotten as soon as the words leave her mouth...
-Often the cost of the day will be put on credit that will take years to pay.
-The younger she is the bigger the wedding...

Sounds very familiar to the "royal" family.

We look everywhere....china,....russia.....but it's your "friends/allies" who really know how to hurt you the worst.

UK is governed by humans just like us. They want the throne just as bad as anyone else.

Originally Posted by manaloneforever

Sounds very familiar to the "royal" family.

We look everywhere....china,....russia.....but it's your "friends/allies" who really know how to hurt you the worst.

UK is governed by humans just like us. They want the throne just as bad as anyone else.

Yes, very much like "Royal" life, and most weddings are mirrored after a royal wedding.

I do not envy any royal, I think it would be a shit life. No privacy, everyone telling you what to do. No matter what you do it is wrong for someone. Everyone out to get a piece of you. Tabloids always printing crap about you, finding the shit photos to print. Having no freedom. Not for me...

Originally Posted by Unboxxed

How can so many women not think they deserve Other People's Money? It's how things are done.

Perhaps others can expand on this better than I'm doing here.

Historically, a woman was the master of the household (greek "oikos", from which engl. "economy" or german "Ökonomie" stem from). She was responsible for it to work and was the de facto slave master. She let other work for her and was only responsible to her man. The man was responsible for providing security (military service) to the community. His duties granted him influece (right to vote) and authority. If the woman didn't obey, the man punished her, if the man didn't obey, other men punished him.

Rights and duties were balanced.

With technological and societal progress some things changed. Slaves got unpopular, several machines were invented which made life easier, women gained the right to vote without the duty to defend the country, households became very easy to manage. The duties of a woman drastically shrinked, her rights went to the stars.

The duties of a man remained the same. He has to let his own blood in a war. He is held responsible for the actions of his woman (and children). But he still had a certain authority and respect.

Rights and duties were not balanced anymore.

Since the 1960s this tendency went on and on to the point where a man has to shoulder all duties and a woman none. Womens rights are meanwhile orbiting Proxima Centauri and are on their way to the outer rim. Mens rights? Almost non-existent.

A woman spends money of a man or men in general because men not only let her do it, no, society incentivizes and forces her to do it. Hidden in taxes we all pay, we finance her health care, education, infrastructure, lawyers and courts, child support, and so on. The dumber women don't get this so this may not come in her mind.

But what even the dumbest nut gets as soon she hit puberty is the desire and attention from men. Yes, Esthar Villar was all right. They know that men are willing to give them money for just being with them, spending time together, and of course sex, ahem, I mean loooove.

Her daddy gave her money to look good, her boyfriend gave her money to feel good, her man has to give her money too, right? And he will and so she goes on in life and then someone tells her that she is stuck in an evil nightmare, patriarchy they call it, where she was the oppressed. And whether or not she believes it, from now on she is free to claim whatever the she wants. From men, from society, from privileged women in case she has a darker skin, or is a lesbian, or part-time lesbian, or mentally ill, or just for fun. You go gurrrl!

Duties = 0, rights = limitless.


Finally, we could say she doesn't know better but women are not that stupid. They get it perfectly well. And they do take it all without remorse.

Originally Posted by manaloneforever

Ask yourself this. What reason would a couple have to post them kissing and showing affection to each other, for the world world to see?

Isn't a relationship suppose to be just for them?

Just a guess here, but maybe it’s because they know that they are living in a fantasy land and are so insecure that they seek the validation of others to shore up the bay before the tsunami of reality hits.

Originally Posted by RustyNuts

Her Wedding Day.

-She is the centre of attention, it's her day!!!
-She gets to dress up in a white dress often ballroom style. (White is signify purity... Or virginity)
-She sits at the "Head Table" looking over the guests that she invited. (peasants)
-The wedding and everything leading up to it, to the honeymoon after is stuffed with tradition.
-The photos are often "PhotoShopped" to appear the wedding was even more fairytale than it was.
-They all want that "White Wedding". The vows are meant to be the most important part, will be forgotten as soon as the words leave her mouth...
-Often the cost of the day will be put on credit that will take years to pay.
-The younger she is the bigger the wedding...

One thing you should know when it comes to women, it goes like this:

The bigger the wedding, the bigger the divorce afterwards.


Because many women want to have a big wedding to be all about herself, and men don't take in account that women plan for a big divorce in the near future.

If it was very small wedding, then then there will be either small divorce or no divorce, because once it's a small wedding, it's rarely a divorce, afterwards. And if there's small divorce, it's not a big deal or a big hurdle.

But if there's a big divorce, prepare to be destroyed by that bitch. Most men that have a big wedding will eventually have a massive, terrifying, divorce in the near future.

So for me, I'm glad I'm single. I just don't want to deal with that. And what for? Just to give a bitch a big wedding day of her life, and have her plan a big divorce rape of my life in near future??

Yeah, no thanks.

Originally Posted by UnKnownSurviving

The problem is that she's from different generation of women. Yeah, she was an actual queen. Beside Queen Elizabeth, we have common women today that are pretending to be queen; those common women that were raised in Disney land fantasy, they will either be stuck in a fantasy or realized the hard way, that the men (Chads/Tyrone) they wants, don't want them after using those women.

But it's becoming rare now that women are even self-aware about the men they pick.

And if they are, they hate choosing low breed men, because they hit the wall.

And if Queen Elizabeth was self-aware, she wouldn't let her sons date sleazy women.

And I don't respect Prince Harry. He was total idiot for knocking up and marrying that disgusting post-carousal rider actress that called Megan.

That Prince Harry should make nice and ask for forgiveness to return to England, because he's not welcome here in my country. And he should take Megan with him.

I actually respected Queen Elizabeth, she seemed like the real deal and from a time when things were perhaps a little better.

I do think she should have butted out when it came to her sons dating lives and first choices for wives. Charles and Andrew both wanted other women but they were vetoed and ended up with women who started the destruction of the Royal family.

Prince Harry is a major cuck and one day we might see a film about Megan and how she achieved the pinnacle of womanhood by marrying an actual Prince only to make him turn on his family and give it all away. They are now desperately trying to maintain the lifestyles they are accustomed to by throwing (mostly his) family under the bus for any one willing to throw money.

Originally Posted by MGTOWFOREVER

A woman is born with value. A man's value is created.

Women are raised that they are always right and beautiful. Men are raised to simp. "You be nice to her, don't hit her back, take her on dates, buy her the thing she mentions, etc". I was even punished based on lies. "Stick your tongue out. It's black so that means you are lying". I later found out that it never changes color cause I am a "tell it like it is " smart ass. Wouldn't it be so easy if cops can just say "stick your tongue out" to see if someone is guilty or not?

Women are raised that they deserve the best no matter what. Men are always asked what we bring to the table. WE ARE THE FREAKING TABLE , THE FLOOR THAT SUPPORTS IT, THE FOOD ON IT, THE ROOF OVER IT, ETC.

It took me to around 29 to see the truth. I was one angry MFer to I realized that no matter what it will never change so I just take care of myself.

Yep, I noticed that when I was still quite young. Women would just have to sit back and wait for men to approach and then pick and choose as they please. That was back in the 70's and 80's and things were different back then. An average or even ugly guy could overcome his shortfalls if he had the right personality and charm. Now it's all online and most women just want to see how many likes they can get and if you don't have the looks it's all over as everything is about your photo.

Originally Posted by Unboxxed

I would also like to see it be recognized or at least examined that girls are trained from a young age to expect money to come to them from others, especially from men, like Daddy, as a solution to their problems or just as an expectation of how things are supposed to be. These young girls grow up to be women who assume a transfer of wealth/assets is a right. Society, which includes the taxes paid by men, is expected to fund their life choices, etc. Abortion is just one that comes to mind quickly but of course there is child support and alimony expectations, and only as long as it's the man paying. And then you got the tons of men who throw money at women for doing nothing, including sites like onlyfans of which I have not watched so I'm going from hearsay on that.

How can so many women not think they deserve Other People's Money? It's how things are done.

Perhaps others can expand on this better than I'm doing here.

Back when I was on the sugar baby site we would often chat on the forum and stir up the sugar babies lol. A lot of them would be self proclaimed Princesses and we would remind them that historically Princesses and female royalty tended to be beheaded. It went down real well!

A lot of the women honestly thought they would get paid just for being around a man. That he would take her shopping etc These women weren't charming and a lot of them weren't even attractive. It was all about them. Look at most female dating profiles it is a long list of demands and nowhere do they mention what they bring to the table. They just assume their photo says it all.

Originally Posted by Kryptic

I actually respected Queen Elizabeth, she seemed like the real deal and from a time when things were perhaps a little better.

I do think she should have butted out when it came to her sons dating lives and first choices for wives. Charles and Andrew both wanted other women but they were vetoed and ended up with women who started the destruction of the Royal family.

Prince Harry is a major cuck and one day we might see a film about Megan and how she achieved the pinnacle of womanhood by marrying an actual Prince only to make him turn on his family and give it all away. They are now desperately trying to maintain the lifestyles they are accustomed to by throwing (mostly his) family under the bus for any one willing to throw money.



Yep, I noticed that when I was still quite young. Women would just have to sit back and wait for men to approach and then pick and choose as they please. That was back in the 70's and 80's and things were different back then. An average or even ugly guy could overcome his shortfalls if he had the right personality and charm. Now it's all online and most women just want to see how many likes they can get and if you don't have the looks it's all over as everything is about your photo.



Back when I was on the sugar baby site we would often chat on the forum and stir up the sugar babies lol. A lot of them would be self proclaimed Princesses and we would remind them that historically Princesses and female royalty tended to be beheaded. It went down real well!

A lot of the women honestly thought they would get paid just for being around a man. That he would take her shopping etc These women weren't charming and a lot of them weren't even attractive. It was all about them. Look at most female dating profiles it is a long list of demands and nowhere do they mention what they bring to the table. They just assume their photo says it all.

I can respect Queen Elizabeth, because she's from a different time, and she's also from a different generation of women.

What I don't like that she's a Queen. And there's no leader. Sure, there was a king, but she had the throne in power for a long time. I don't respect her decisions as Queen. I prefer a King in power. Why? Because males and men are good at being decision makers. Just not women as "Queens".


Yeah, Prince Harry has become a cuck and a simp. Any man can see Prince Harry doesn't have control over his woman and his relationship. Who the fuck wants to follow and emulate that idiot??? Man, I lost all respect for him. He used to be a Chad. Now he's a beta simp.

Disgusting.

Originally Posted by UnKnownSurviving

What I don't like that she's a Queen. And there's no leader. Sure, there was a king, but she had the throne in power for a long time. I don't respect her decisions as Queen. I prefer a King in power. Why? Because males and men are good at being decision makers. Just not women as "Queens".

Ummm... There has not been a very good track record for the British Monarchy with male or King decision making in recent years.

Maybe start here?

Edward VIII - Wikipedia

-Gave up the throne as he simped after 2x divorced Wallis Simpson. WTF? He could have had any woman, but he picked a 2x rejected one.
-Strong ties with Hitler?

George VI - Wikipedia

-The last Monarch of the British Empire. If it's his fault or not or just sign of the times, the last of the big colonies left under his reign.

Charles III - Wikipedia

-I liked Dianna. But WTF did Charles want? A reject like his Great Uncle...
-It looks like one of his best Mates is Klaus Schwab... What could go wrong there?

Prince Andrew, Duke of York - Wikipedia

-I think his decisions are still evolving...
-Epstein... Virginia Giuffre... This was not a smart...
-Sarah Ferguson... That didn't work out well for him...

Why the failure of the British Male Monarchs? They have to be followers, there is no real ruling any more. For the most part it is a position that is dictated by tradition. A strong (Alpha type) man would be very restricted in the position, the system would likely break that out of any man first.

Originally Posted by RustyNuts

Ummm... There has not been a very good track record for the British Monarchy with male or King decision making in recent years.

Maybe start here?

Edward VIII - Wikipedia

-Gave up the throne as he simped after 2x divorced Wallis Simpson. WTF? He could have had any woman, but he picked a 2x rejected one.
-Strong ties with Hitler?

George VI - Wikipedia

-The last Monarch of the British Empire. If it's his fault or not or just sign of the times, the last of the big colonies left under his reign.

Charles III - Wikipedia

-I liked Dianna. But WTF did Charles want? A reject like his Great Uncle...
-It looks like one of his best Mates is Klaus Schwab... What could go wrong there?

Prince Andrew, Duke of York - Wikipedia

-I think his decisions are still evolving...
-Epstein... Virginia Giuffre... This was not a smart...
-Sarah Ferguson... That didn't work out well for him...

Why the failure of the British Male Monarchs? They have to be followers, there is no real ruling any more. For the most part it is a position that is dictated by tradition. A strong (Alpha type) man would be very restricted in the position, the system would likely break that out of any man first.

Rather unfortunate, if you asked me. There's a saying that Jesus will be the last King of the earth, and His will be a 1,000 year reign of promises kept. Meaning there won't be a democracy under His rule. It is said that Jesus will rule with an Iron fist, and will dash against communist/liberal/feminism.

Also, it is said that Jesus will be handing out a great justice for people, not just men that had a terrible injustice against them, but so Jesus will punish and pay back those who delivered evil injustice against men, and other people. And it will be extreme justice rightly deserved.

So many believers are waiting for Jesus to come back and right those wrongs. For me, I'm waiting for Jesus to get rid of feminism, and punish those women. I see so many men that were given injustice and whose lives were destroyed by women.

Mind you, I don't hate women, but I hate the fact that those women get away with it.

My question is do Americans really want sovereignty or not?

It seems as today The UK and Canada partictly are way to influential in American politics and and society.

Was that not the purpose of the American revolutionary war and the ultimatum of why America was founded? To create a completely new world that was different from a British monarchical society.

It seems like slowly but surely the yankees own America again and have crept back into our lives and we don't even realize it.

All this feminism shit is from the UK. Feminism started in the Uk in 1837 and came into fruition in America in 1848.

Originally Posted by manaloneforever

My question is do Americans really want sovereignty or not?

It seems as today The UK and Canada partictly are way to influential in American politics and and society.

Was that not the purpose of the American revolutionary war and the ultimatum of why America was founded? To create a completely new world that was different from a British monarchical society.

It seems like slowly but surely the yankees own America again and have crept back into our lives and we don't even realize it.

All this feminism shit is from the UK. Feminism started in the Uk in 1837 and came into fruition in America in 1848.

As an American, I prefer sovereignty in my country. As I mentioned that Jesus will rule the world in Israel as his sovereignty in power, the world power will be brought under their knees and Jesus's 1,000 year reign will be UNLIKE any other rule as an empire. Jesus will have his own empire for 1,000 year. This will piss off a lot of feminists, those of globalists, and white knights, and those that hate men, because Jesus's empire will not include democracy or any type of voting system. If that's the case, you can imagine rights for women will be nonexistent, and men will be revived, but with under Jesus's rule. So you can imagine, how feminists will hate Jesus, because He made men masculine again, and women back to being women. But I hope Jesus will remember me, and I have questions for him, about my place in His Kingdom. I just have no interests in dating women any more, if Jesus is coming back and rule the world. I'm too much damaged because the idiot women that were formerly in placed, and that there were weak men in power.

I'm serving Jesus right now, and reading the bible, almost every day. So when Jesus comes back, I need to be ready for Him.

To be frank, I have no love for women, anymore. Frankly, I'm dead inside because of women. This does not mean I hate women. Quite the contrary. But I am jaded because of women, and their female nature. When Jesus comes back, I want to ask him something, because I don't want to be blue pill again. I don't want to go back to being traditional again. Once I see that women are the way women are, because of their nature, I cannot forget the knowledge that I have. So, when Jesus comes back, I want to have a discussion with Jesus, because I don't to be fooled by women again.

i cannot trust women. At all. Even when Jesus comes back and fixes everything, I don't want to forget the knowledge of women's female nature.

While America has sovereignty for so many years, it's slowly been ebbing away, a piece by piece, because of feminism. I'll have to dig into history of feminism and feminism's roots in some places like America and England.

Mind you, I'm a half breed Puerto Rican jew whose political elements is Right winger, staunch conservative, and strong belief in Jesus. And I hate any forms of feminism. I'm actually grateful to Jesus, that I was born a man, and born in America.

It's my belief that America should be without feminism. Now, mind you I'm not an MRAs, or part of that group. I have a belief system that goes back in the Old Testament. While I cannot control America, I'm controlling my own lifestyle, learning more about myself, and having my own desires for single life style. So I am grateful for America that I live in. But I hate the feminism in America. It shouldn't exist at all.

I have an Indian mgtow friend in India, and he says that women in his country are extremely feminists. I'm like, whoa. And he told me crazy stories of feminist Indian women living abroad like America and whoring with college men in their youth. I can confirmed with this story of his, and other stories that I heard.

Anyway, there's a lot to process.