Thread: TERF Fight: In UK, Lesbian Feminists Are Allowed to Criticize Transgender Ex-Men. Disgusting!

"How British Feminism Became Anti-Trans
A surprisingly mainstream movement of feminists known as TERFs oppose transgender rights as a symptom of “female erasure.”

"Here’s a truly wonderful New York Times oped, Coalition of the Fringes division, about how, while in America the natural order prevails in which transgender ex-men are rightly recognized as just plain all around more worthy than lesbians, in Britain’s Progressive Stack, perversely, lesbians are seen as more female than real women like Caitlyn Jenner. The author doesn’t quite get around to calling for the US Strategic Air Command to shoot cruise missiles at lesbian intellectual strongholds in Bloomsbury, but maybe next week …

It reads like Godfrey Elfwick and Titania McGrath teamed up to hoax the Times by illustrating my point that the Coalition of the Margins don’t necessarily get along with each other, but I think it’s sincere. Or maybe not … Who can tell these days?
Full article: https://vdare.com/posts/terf-fight-i...men-disgusting

For those of us who bought balcony tickets to the fight, TERF is an acronym for Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist. This group asserts that trans-women are not really women.

It's too radical for these Radical Feminists. It's so far left that it slingshots them to the right, placing them in agreement with conservatives and anyone else who won't adjust their pronouns.

Reminds me that women say it's ok for women to go into the men's room but penised individuals cannot go into the women's room. Because, well, reciprocity is not on their list of buzz words.

Holy sheeit! Just went down the rabbit hole aways over the issue of the Limey TERFs and what the US-radfems have to say. Through the jibber-jabber, it looks like there's a major schism brewing in Anglo-feminism.

<exeunt stage left, for popcorn>

Originally Posted by Unboxxed

For those of us who bought balcony tickets to the fight

I have a skybox to this shit. Everyone is welcome to the viewing party. I'm ready to laugh my ass off. The suspense is killing me. Someone start the fight already.

The socialist overlords are not pleased. They have a problem on their hands. I want to see how they're going to fix this and still manage to keep playing identity politics. Tick tock. It's almost high noon.

Who would have thought that so many groups fighting for victimhood and dominance would eventually clash?

The radfems aka butch lesbians show masculine traits but when their golden pussy rights and privileges are on the line they revert to the female domain. When transexual men that dress up as women show more feminine traits it threatens the entire cultural theory of the "feminist mystique". In other words, there is no mystery to woman and feminity and also why ideology based on gender politics fails the test of time.

TERFS are not that big in the United States, but they do exist in the most liberal parts of the Democratic party. They are not as strong as outside of the US but they will gain traction again if Kaitlyn Jenners of the world keep stealing their thunder so to speak.

Originally Posted by Morlock

Who would have thought that so many groups fighting for victimhood and dominance would eventually clash?

As you take more and more people under your flag, you start to enlarge small differences in your own group. Disagreements become fierce, factions form. If one of them gets dominant, the same process is repeated. See: Christianity.

Is Libtard betting a thing yet?

If you discriminate against men; you'll see more gays and transexuals. It is simple economics, whatever you tax decreases, whatever you subside increases.

Ah! Infighting within the enemy's ranks!

Me so happy.

This guy breaks down the situation fairly well.

Originally Posted by Zoidberg

As you take more and more people under your flag, you start to enlarge small differences in your own group. Disagreements become fierce, factions form. If one of them gets dominant, the same process is repeated. See: Christianity.

Exactly. L G B T I Q that is 6 groups, some of which are obviously against one other group, Bi for example, doesn't that imply there are only 2 genders? How does that work with Intersex and Transexual?

Can someone who loves both genders support someone who doesn't?

Kudos to the masterminds behind the curtain though. Divide, divide and then divide some more.

I'm still getting my head around this. This is what it seems like to me.
These women want the choice to be gay or trans. However they do not want men to have these same choices.

Its all about taking away more choices from men. Not allowing men to escape the plantation by claiming gay or trans.

Originally Posted by Morlock

Exactly. L G B T I Q that is 6 groups, some of which are obviously against one other group, Bi for example, doesn't that imply there are only 2 genders? How does that work with Intersex and Transexual?

Can someone who loves both genders support someone who doesn't?

Kudos to the masterminds behind the curtain though. Divide, divide and then divide some more.

The us against them mentality comes naturally to us humans, and it works wonders even if nobody is exploiting it. How many groups are under the same flag is not very important, I think, because even if you start out as a monolithic group, and somehow manage to take over the minds of everyone, the us against them mentality will still be there, and it will start to magnify any differences it can find. If all else fails, people will happily fight each other because of the color of their hair.

These women want the choice to be gay or trans. However they do not want men to have these same choices.

Indeed, and trans men have called their bluff.

Originally Posted by Zoidberg

The us against them mentality comes naturally to us humans, and it works wonders even if nobody is exploiting it. How many groups are under the same flag is not very important, I think, because even if you start out as a monolithic group, and somehow manage to take over the minds of everyone, the us against them mentality will still be there, and it will start to magnify any differences it can find. If all else fails, people will happily fight each other because of the color of their hair.

It always makes me laugh when I hear people say "If we were all the same colour there would be no wars or racism" I guess they know nothing about all the wars between Europe or the racism that the white Irish suffered at the hands of the white English. Among many other examples.

It was also black African tribes selling other black Africans to slavers.

Originally Posted by Opaque

If you discriminate against men; you'll see more gays and transexuals. It is simple economics, whatever you tax decreases, whatever you subside increases.

Ironically enough what feminists do is try to force men into cookie cutter boxes of what they want at a moments notice. Gay men and transsexuals only fall in the best friend category but when they are competing for attention in the victim hood Olympics radfems go nuts.

This is why there are a lot of gay men that understand the manipulation of women so well as they were once best friends with women spilling their deepest and darkest secrets. Unlike what media portrays most gay men are not as vocal about their sexuality like it is portrayed by a minority. This is because gay men are still rooted in an understanding about viewing the world through the lens of men first.

We called it like 4 years ago on this very forum when a few of us said the Far Left would eventually start eating their own.

It's like a "special" MTV episode of Celebrity Deathmatch between two retards in the Victim Olympics!

I'm grabbing the POPCORN!

This time, i'm gonna to go old-school to the Orville Redenbacher sour cream flavor I made in the microwave in the 80s. And I'm JUST old enough to remember the late 70s/early 80s with only rotary phones in my parent's upper-middle-class house, NO MICROWAVE (an old POPCORN device instead)...I digress. I was born in '73. Time to grab the POPCORN!

Isn't it funny how people who scream "INTOLERANCE" at everyone--from their PLASTIC socially engineered pseudo-moralistic ivory towers--are ONCE AGAIN showing yet another display of THEIR intolerance. Hypocrite much?

A sucker is born everyday and they're definitely ALL are one of those. Silly women, ha HA HA...

Originally Posted by Morlock

It always makes me laugh when I hear people say "If we were all the same colour there would be no wars or racism" I guess they know nothing about all the wars between Europe or the racism that the white Irish suffered at the hands of the white English.

Yeah, if there was only one race left, there would be no racism. But there would still be differences. It is like walking intro a dark room from the light. You can barely see anything at first, but as your eyes adapt to the dark, the contrast increases. Everything is the same in the room as when you entered it, but your perception has changed. The smaller the differences between people, the more important every little detail seems to us.

Originally Posted by Zoidberg

Yeah, if there was only one race left, there would be no racism. But there would still be differences. It is like walking intro a dark room from the light. You can barely see anything at first, but as your eyes adapt to the dark, the contrast increases. Everything is the same in the room as when you entered it, but your perception has changed. The smaller the differences between people, the more important every little detail seems to us.

There will always be something to fight about is my opinion. And if there isn't anything to fight about at all then something will be invented. In a world full of beige people the racism will be about who is more or less beige than some other group. There will be some kind of division. "Look at that freak with the blue eyes, oh my God! No one has blue eyes anymore!"

As you say the smaller the differences the more every little detail will matter.