Thread: SIMP husbank wants his cheatin' cop wifey back

In sane times, I'd say unfookingbelievable.
Son of a Pastor...probably thinks it's a sin to divorce this sloot.
Hint: it isn't, given little wifey was unfaithful.
L'dMAO at the part where the writer called the sloot a "siren..." guess there's a couple of ways to take that one.
Anyways, enjoy...


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...icks-wife.html

Marrying a public toilet is one thing, but wanting her back with everyone's shit in her bowl is another!

Fucking stupid sauchäeb. That dude's gotta be the simpiest simp who's ever simped.

In today's world she'll probably be getting paid to do porn soon.

Originally Posted by NorthwoodsHermit

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...icks-wife.html

Huh. She's what the pediatricians call a FLK - Funny Lookin' Kid. Some genes not firing on all cylinders there.

Goes to show you the type of man who is wifing any of these modern women are.

Truly desperate and impetuous individuals.

Good lord, she is fugly too

She looks inbred.

WTF???

How could you put up with her behavior and then still want to continue the relationship? He has shown weakness in keeping her, so she will have even less respect or admiration for him than she did before. The husband being that weak.... They belong together, two pieces of trash.

Some simps never learn, do they, the funny thing is he see's nothing wrong with it. Simps really do see the term "simp" as a derogatory word for a guy who's nice to women, they BELIEVE that. I say they deserve each other.

SMH on the Sherriff “boss” as well. “He’s a better man than me”…. WTF?!?

As Tig so eloquently put it, “he’s the simpiest simp who ever simped”. That don’t make a good man in my book. It makes him about as good a man as the gimp in Pulp Fiction.

What an absolute disgrace of a man. Not only does he want this piece of whoring flesh back, but he’s willing to subject himself to all the shame and ridicule that will come along with it.

Let him have her. She definitely won’t stick around forever. There will be more cock brigades on the horizon elsewhere and Simpy here will have to begrudgingly reactivate his Match.com profile.

Did you notice the guy was the son of a pastor?

I keep bringing it up in my posts on the forum - and I fear I may be banned for it, since many of my MGTOW brothers refuse to see the correlation between the mindset of simps and the mindset of religiosity. But the two are very similar - it's basically a refusal to be rational, an embracing of a stubborn repetition: "I will NOT use my mind and my intellect to judge THIS part of my beliefs; no, THESE I will NEVER touch, these I will never doubt".

Look at what Jesus teaches about forgiveness: https://biblehub.com/matthew/18-22.htm

So if my wife chooses to be a cum dumpster for her colleagues at work, makes me a laughing stock in my community, gets infected by STDs and infects me and mine...

...well, I should forgive her - over, and over.

Peter asks: "How many times? seven times?"

Jesus replies - "seventy seven!" - that is, forgive always, forgive forever!

...with an implied: "just like my Father forgives you every time".

Any MGTOW who doesn't see how this "correlates" with women's way of thinking, how this basically destroys any notion of accountability, personal responsibility, fidelity, of anything worthwhile in a relationship...
...well, he chooses to be blind. The phenomenon is called "cognitive dissonance" - the deliberate choice to ignore the truth, even when it is staring one in the face.

Then again, speaking about accountability in the house of a god who punishes someone for the sins of someone else is kind of moot, anyway.

Nothing makes sense in the lives of true believers - I am in fact quite certain that no true believer ever really, truly sat down and read the Bible, all of it. If you do, you realize it's full of nonsense like these "77 forgives"; bits and pieces that you can use to "explain" everything, from choosing to basically tolerate living next to this disgusting whore, to smashing babies against rocks: https://biblehub.com/psalms/137-9.htm

Pathetic, as ever.

Of all the girls to simp for he picked one of the ugliest lol

Originally Posted by end_of_days

Did you notice the guy was the son of a pastor?

I keep bringing it up in my posts on the forum - and I fear I may be banned for it, since many of my MGTOW brothers refuse to see the correlation between the mindset of simps and the mindset of religiosity. But the two are very similar - it's basically a refusal to be rational, an embracing of a stubborn repetition: "I will NOT use my mind and my intellect to judge THIS part of my beliefs; no, THESE I will NEVER touch, these I will never doubt".

Look at what Jesus teaches about forgiveness: https://biblehub.com/matthew/18-22.htm

So if my wife chooses to be a cum dumpster for her colleagues at work, makes me a laughing stock in my community, gets infected by STDs and infects me and mine...

...well, I should forgive her - over, and over.

Peter asks: "How many times? seven times?"

Jesus replies - "seventy seven!" - that is, forgive always, forgive forever!

...with an implied: "just like my Father forgives you every time".

Any MGTOW who doesn't see how this "correlates" with women's way of thinking, how this basically destroys any notion of accountability, personal responsibility, fidelity, of anything worthwhile in a relationship...
...well, he chooses to be blind. The phenomenon is called "cognitive dissonance" - the deliberate choice to ignore the truth, even when it is staring one in my face.

Then again, speaking about accountability in the house of a god who punishes someone for the sins of someone else is kind of moot, anyway.

Nothing makes sense in the lives of true believers - I am in fact quite certain that no true believer ever really, truly sat down and read the Bible, all of it. If you do, you realize it's full of nonsense like these "77 forgives"; bits and pieces that you can use to "explain" everything, from choosing to basically tolerate living next to this disgusting whore, to smashing babies against rocks: https://biblehub.com/psalms/137-9.htm

Pathetic, as ever.

I know what you are getting at, BUT....

There is a message in the Bible about being coupled (?) with a non-believer.. Coupled would mean married or in partnership if it was business. On that point alone maybe ditch her? I'm no Bible expert and have forgot heaps over the years.

As always, taking the bible literally can be very confusing... With the forgiveness aspect, I take it as forgive as in don't hold hate inside for someone, be at peace with yourself.

Each person reading whatever part they want in the Bible will get their own message from it. It's a history book of sorts that was written well after the events took place in a different language that has been translated into other languages that are evolving.

Originally Posted by WheelBarrow

She looks inbred.

Both families have that inbred look I noticed. Maybe she was fucking around to break the cycle of inbreeding by getting pregnant by a non family member?

Originally Posted by RustyNuts

I know what you are getting at, BUT....

...

Each person reading whatever part they want in the Bible will get their own message from it. It's a history book of sorts that was written well after the events took place in a different language that has been translated into other languages that are evolving.

And that, exactly, is the problem Rusty.

A book where "each one... gets their own message", is not a book worth living your life by.
It's basically just like a female's brain - it has "opinions on everything", but substantiates nothing

A good example of this, is that it casually mentions slavery. How difficult would it be, for Jesus - the supposed creator of the universe (or his son) - to provide a clear, and unambiguous message about whether slavery is a morally abhorrent thing? The almighty maker of an infinite series of galaxies, omniscient and ever aware of everything that ever is, has been and ever will be in the minds of humans.... Yet he somehow fails to realize that the human race will actually use the Bible to defend slavery and the trade of human beings? He can count the hair on your head, and predict the end of days to an iota - but somehow neglects to tell Peter: "oh, btw - I can see that in your future, evil men will trade human beings like cattle. This is disgusting; anyone doing this will rot in Hell forever".

Nope He didn't say anything like that. He left the slave traders - how did you put it? - to "get their own message" from the Holy Book. And the message they got was that Jesus talked about slaves in plenty of his parables, and never, ever, suggested their existence was a bad thing. He kept using the Aramaic word for "doulae" (in the Greek translation of the Bible that formed the basis for the KJ version) to refer to the relationship between good masters and their obedient slaves - a term he in fact frequently used to describe the "optimal" relationship between God and his believers.

What good is a morality book that is full of this sort of "gray" areas?

Slavery is evil. It's as simple as that.

So is a metric fuck-ton of things mentioned in the "Holy" book - from Lot sleeping with this daughters, to the periodic genocides the "blessed Jewish people" inflicted on their neighbors, etc. Again, don't take my word for it - go ahead and read the Holy book, cover to cover. If you don't start feeling the urge to vomit after a while, there's something seriously wrong with you.

Now, don't get me wrong. The Christian leaders were not dumb; they quickly realized they had to substantially augment the teachings of their leader - since he, erm, forgot to cover, and/or left in a gray area about a GAZILLION issues of human existence. And augment it they did, by writing volumes upon volumes upon volumes - that NO ONE reads, by the way.

And of course, these volumes tell us nothing about the truth - other than that only we, that live inside this reality, have the moral authority to create rules and regulations about what works and what doesn't. An immortal being that lives outside time has no right to tell you you should shut up and tolerate your whore of a wife after she gets gangbanged by half a dozen of the police force's finest. Or that you should forgive her 77 times, but after her 78th show on OnlyFans, you should then ask your Rabbi for a refund.

I just wish more of my MGTOW brothers would make this leap of... non-faith; and bravely face the fact that yes, we are all alone on this miserable planet. And in spite of the pain this existence causes us, our moral responsibilities have nothing to do with pleasing a fake God and avoiding his fake Hell; and instead they have everything to do with us being Humans, and distance ourselves from the animals we evolved from.

Originally Posted by end_of_days

I just wish more of my MGTOW brothers would make this leap of... non-faith; and bravely face the fact that yes, we are all alone on this miserable planet. And in spite of the pain this existence causes us, our moral responsibilities have nothing to do with pleasing a fake God and avoiding his fake Hell; and instead they have everything to do with us being Humans, and distance ourselves from the animals we evolved from.

Good Luck with that.... I put that "Wish" right alongside of a man to be able to force feed RP truths to another man that has BP ideals. It's just a great way to alienate yourself when to wish to force your beliefs onto someone else.

PS: I'm a believer in evolution. IMO, Human nature or more, female nature is proof we evolved over millions of years. You don't have to work on me....

Originally Posted by end_of_days

Did you notice the guy was the son of a pastor?

I keep bringing it up in my posts on the forum - and I fear I may be banned for it, since many of my MGTOW brothers refuse to see the correlation between the mindset of simps and the mindset of religiosity. But the two are very similar - it's basically a refusal to be rational, an embracing of a stubborn repetition: "I will NOT use my mind and my intellect to judge THIS part of my beliefs; no, THESE I will NEVER touch, these I will never doubt".

Look at what Jesus teaches about forgiveness: https://biblehub.com/matthew/18-22.htm

So if my wife chooses to be a cum dumpster for her colleagues at work, makes me a laughing stock in my community, gets infected by STDs and infects me and mine...

...well, I should forgive her - over, and over.

Peter asks: "How many times? seven times?"

Jesus replies - "seventy seven!" - that is, forgive always, forgive forever!

...with an implied: "just like my Father forgives you every time".

Any MGTOW who doesn't see how this "correlates" with women's way of thinking, how this basically destroys any notion of accountability, personal responsibility, fidelity, of anything worthwhile in a relationship...
...well, he chooses to be blind. The phenomenon is called "cognitive dissonance" - the deliberate choice to ignore the truth, even when it is staring one in my face.

Then again, speaking about accountability in the house of a god who punishes someone for the sins of someone else is kind of moot, anyway.

Nothing makes sense in the lives of true believers - I am in fact quite certain that no true believer ever really, truly sat down and read the Bible, all of it. If you do, you realize it's full of nonsense like these "77 forgives"; bits and pieces that you can use to "explain" everything, from choosing to basically tolerate living next to this disgusting whore, to smashing babies against rocks: https://biblehub.com/psalms/137-9.htm

Pathetic, as ever.

You may be a little mistaken and seeing the actions of "christians" and thinking that is how the bible teaches. But if you did read the bible cover to cover (with a gender correct translation), you will see that it is pure unadulterated red pill.

The correct quote you quoted is to forgive a brother that sins against you. The bible is very deliberate about when men vs women. Women are given great prominance in the bible, so it is not dismissive of women. (it is not a typo, or a scenario where sister was omitted because of the old times)

Now should women also be forgiven 77 times? That is opening another can of worms that gets into the topic of agency and women.