Thread: Scientific Redpills - Study finds: The uglier you are, the more your wife or girlfriend wants to fuck other men when she can get pregnant.

Studies like this are a great read, redpills with scientific evidence. I am going to translate this shit into normal English. The study title is:


“Women's sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner developmental instability”.


The uglier you are, the more your wife or girlfriend wants to fuck other men when she can get pregnant.




“Normally ovulating women have been found to report greater sexual attraction to men other than their own partners when near ovulation relative to the luteal phase”


Normal girlfriends and wives do not want to fuck their boyfriend or husband when they can get pregnant.




“In a sample of 54 couples, we found that women whose partners had high developmental instability (high fluctuating asymmetry) had greater attraction to men other than their partners, and less attraction to their own partners, when fertile.”


Out of 54 couples, girlfriends and wives who had ugly boyfriends or husband wanted to fuck someone else even more when they were ready to get pregnant.




“Women's sexual preferences and interests change across their ovulatory cycles.”


Vagina tingles depend on vagina tingles.




“females may sometimes benefit from a strategy in which they secure investment from a long-term mate and obtain genetic benefits from extra-pair partners.”


Betabux, alphafux.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1559901/

Comes as no surprise at all.

But thank you for the topic. Another straight to the point reminder to stay MGTOW.

luteal phase = the latter part of the menstrual cycle.

“In a sample of 54 couples, we found that women whose partners had high developmental instability (high fluctuating asymmetry) had greater attraction to men other than their partners, and less attraction to their own partners, when fertile.”

Fluctuating Asymmetry. I had to read through the article to be sure what they meant:

Men's FA was measured on 10 body traits: ear length, ear width, elbow width, wrist width, length of the fingers, ankle width and foot width. The right and left sides were measured twice using metal calipers.

Gee, I didn't realize these measurements fluctuated on me. Does a guy about have to wear a long-sleeved hoodie to cover up all of his irregularities during the luteal phase? LOL

"Studies" like these convince men to GTOW. No wife, no problem. No girlfriend, fatter wallet.

Anyone else getting the sense that this study is to "normalize" cuckoldry and polyandry?

I have read similar before, depending on the woman's cycles she either wants the big macho man or the Beta cuck. Macho man is when she's horny and Beta to bring up the kid and earn the $$$.

Beta Bucks, Alpha fucks.

It's Chad or bust, baby!

And the thing is most men will not register as Chad to women so most men will go "bust".

Another reason to go your own way.

Originally Posted by Kryptic

Anyone else getting the sense that this study is to "normalize" cuckoldry and polyandry?

I have read similar before, depending on the woman's cycles she either wants the big macho man or the Beta cuck. Macho man is when she's horny and Beta to bring up the kid and earn the $$$.

Beta Bucks, Alpha fucks.

I do not believe the study is to normalize cuckoldry or polyandry. A hypothesis was formed, tested, and found to be true. What a person does with the information is up to them.

FWIW the fatter and uglier my first wife got. The more I wanted to fuck other women. I can assure you all it had nothing to do with me wanting to get pregnant either. It was just her being ugly.

Just calling bullshit on this study. Does not hold up to the flip the genders litmus test.

Originally Posted by O.G.

FWIW the fatter and uglier my first wife got. The more I wanted to fuck other women. I can assure you all it had nothing to do with me wanting to get pregnant either. It was just her being ugly.

Just calling bullshit on this study. Does not hold up to the flip the genders litmus test.

The study is not about 'wanting to get pregnant', it is about when she can get pregnant. The idea here is to uncover the hidden motivations drive human behavior.

What hidden motivation.

For whatever reason. Be it man or woman. You decide you are not attracted to your spouse. Fat/ugly/bad attitude whatever.

You end up wishing or trying to fuck someone else.

Originally Posted by O.G.

What hidden motivation.

For whatever reason. Be it man or woman. You decide you are not attracted to your spouse. Fat/ugly/bad attitude whatever.

You end up wishing or trying to fuck someone else.

For, "You decide" suppresses all the questions one could ask about the systems of the brain that prevents a person from feeling attracted to their spouse.

How or why does the brain create the thought or attitude that a person is fat, ugly, or bad?

Where does the conscience experience that a person is fat come from, the brain?

If conscience experience comes from the brain, we must acknowledge that people and animals do not pick to have the brain they have.

If conscience experience is not the brain, where does conscience experience come from?

What do you mean when you say, 'You decide'?

It must be nice living with a cold and calculating mating algorithm. I'm not a Chad but I've had enough taken women come on to me to know I'll never be the sucker on the other side.

Originally Posted by Kryptic

Anyone else getting the sense that this study is to "normalize" cuckoldry and polyandry?

I have read similar before, depending on the woman's cycles she either wants the big macho man or the Beta cuck. Macho man is when she's horny and Beta to bring up the kid and earn the $$$.

Beta Bucks, Alpha fucks.

It is sort of normalized as you say about Beta Bucks and Alfa fucks. It's part of evolution that makes up female nature. The female naturally wants the best chance for her offspring, (health/looks, and intelligence) she can't change her genes but she can choose the best she get for the male contribution. If they want it all in one man, and all women do, they look for strong "6 sixes" and shop in the top 10% of men ignoring the fact that these men don't have to commit to any one woman.... Around they go in that whirlpool....


"Normalize" chuckoldry and polyandry.... Maybe.... When you look at the "Rabbit Holes" the WEF (World Economic Forum) have open for the human race with the great reset, population reduction, social credit system, chipping etc., why wouldn't they want gene selection? But easier to artificially introduce gene selection and eliminate natural selection of the genes ... The Super Human??? It will be in one of the WEF "Plans"...

Originally Posted by O.G.

FWIW the fatter and uglier my first wife got. The more I wanted to fuck other women. I can assure you all it had nothing to do with me wanting to get pregnant either. It was just her being ugly.

Just calling bullshit on this study. Does not hold up to the flip the genders litmus test.

This study is about female nature and the selection of a mate for reproduction. A female naturally puts a greater amount of her resources into her child, she wants the best chance she can get for good genes for the survival and success of the child.

Male nature for selection of a mate for reproduction is "less resources spent the better..." With enough resources he can get more than one female... More than one female then his chances of successful reproduction doubles. Think back cave man days when human evolutionary behavior was being made...

When I was in the game, before I wised up, whilst still very much an ignorant, socially groomed, brainwashed, gynocentric fool - I wanted the best I could get. Women want what's best for themselves and, for that, I have no issue. Be strong, brave and independent, no matter to which of the dozens of genders you choose to identify. No man has ever said, "I want that fat, disgusting, stinky, lazy, skanky, dumb, intolerable, feminist pig with a gender studies degree, the one right over there next to the statue of Hillary Clinton."

Then, I learned that the only way to win the game, because the game is heavily rigged against men, is not to play it. Unfortunately, I didn't figure that out until it nearly destroyed my life, which is a feature, not a bug. Thanks to the MGTOW mindset however, I was able to fill in all of the missing pieces purposely hidden from view, by those that hoped to enslave and dispose of me, which are women and their state pimps/violence proxy. MGTOW saves. The Red Pill saves.

I thank all that's good that I didn't end up baby trapped like so many other unfortunates. I'm extremely lucky to have escaped marriage still relatively in tact. Marriage nearly took my life. Countless millions of men weren't/aren't as fortunate.

Until they completely destroy your life, ignorance and self-delusion are sheer bliss.

The system is set up to fuck men over and to privilege women in every way. The system is set up to create easily exploitable and highly disposable men. These aren't biological imperatives, but rather exploitation-grooming through the promotion of chivalry, courtly love, male disposability and gynocentrism.

Fuck them. Fuck all of them. Go MGTOW.

Loved your “back to basics” explanations because these freaks talk in a language I just don’t understand and nor do I want to.

It looks like English, it reads like English, but it’s not any form of English that would be understood by most, therefore I have to ask is it English?

Maybe TheCaptain would like to weigh in here. Just who are they trying to communicate to/with?

Originally Posted by GrnB

I do not believe the study is to normalize cuckoldry or polyandry. A hypothesis was formed, tested, and found to be true. What a person does with the information is up to them.

Ah, but have you looked in to the motivations behind the study? Be careful of “studies”, they often have hidden agendas.

Originally Posted by Jackoff

Ah, but have you looked in to the motivations behind the study? Be careful of “studies”, they often have hidden agendas.

Great comment. Lies, damned lies and statistics. The marriage studies supposedly prove that married men live better, wealthier lives than single men. They purposely leave out formerly married men, who make up HALF of previously married males, aka divorced men, because their life outcomes would destroy the narrative that married men live better lives than single men.

It's the same as saying, "People that eat tons of ice cream live better, happier, richer lives than people who don't.", while leaving out the fact that many ravenous ice cream eaters live shorter lives due to obesity and its complications. This is exactly how cigarette companies used to market their death sticks, prior to the truth being widely exposed, which Big Tobacco fought for years to hide from the public.

You can't trust the studies on anything, ever. We must always lift up the covers to discover the rapacious bed bugs that lie in stealth beneath. Nearly everything is driven by someone's political agenda, false propaganda, self-interest, deception, misinformation and outright lies.

Until they completely destroy your life, ignorance and self-delusion are sheer bliss. They want you to swallow The Blue Pill. Take The Red Pill instead. It pisses them off, which can be great fun.

Post Red Pill Rage - We MGTOW Become Far Smarter and Far Wiser

We're Censored/Banned Because We Know Too Much

The State Pimpistry and The Office of Vaginal Wellness, Progress and Proxy Violence don't want smart, wise men. They want easily exploitable and disposable men.

The questioning of the truthfulness of the study is appreciated. If anyone discovers any bias within the study or has any guess about a hidden agenda, please post them.


The main area where bias is an issue, is these studies have to be approved by the university system. A system that all of us would agree has a bias towards gynocentrism. This argument is towards the truthfulness of the study.


Truth about who women want to have sex with is a chink in the armor of the bluepill mindset.


“Remember… all I am offering you is the truth. Nothing more.” - Morpheus


And, browsing the archives this morning, another study, showing the same results as this study was found.


“In line with previous findings, we found support for the hypothesis that the degree to which a woman’s romantic partner displays indicators of high-fitness genes affects women’s attractions to their own partner and other men at high fertility.”


Normal English:


Another study finds: The uglier you are, the more your girlfriend wants to fuck other men when she can get pregnant.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3440410/

Originally Posted by GrnB

The questioning of the truthfulness of the study is appreciated. If anyone discovers any bias within the study or has any guess about a hidden agenda, please post them.


The main area where bias is an issue, is these studies have to be approved by the university system. A system that all of us would agree has a bias towards gynocentrism. This argument is towards the truthfulness of the study.


Truth about who women want to have sex with is a chink in the armor of the bluepill mindset.


“Remember… all I am offering you is the truth. Nothing more.” - Morpheus


And, browsing the archives this morning, another study, showing the same results as this study was found.


“In line with previous findings, we found support for the hypothesis that the degree to which a woman’s romantic partner displays indicators of high-fitness genes affects women’s attractions to their own partner and other men at high fertility.”


Normal English:


Another study finds: The uglier you are, the more your girlfriend wants to fuck other men when she can get pregnant.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3440410/

Oddly, it's an admission that women are exceptionally shallow people. No surprise there.

This may be a simple bilateral study in both Biochemistry and Sociology. (I did minor in the latter at Portland State University).

While I can't say as that I have read the study, the synopsis seems to arrive at the natural proclivity of womankind to enhance the likelihood of reproduction/replication. This may also be a gynocentric piece, focusing on the desirablity of the male that possesses the greater chance of survival and success. Since men have been relegated to a "utilitarian" (disposable) status, it makes sense.