Thread: Question about women flaunting their bodies.

We all have heard women/feminists complain that they don't like being treated as sex objects.
I find that rather ironic because women, especially young women, dress with the sexiest clothing they can find.

Think about it. On any public street, at least in western cultures, you will see women wearing the tightest "yoga" pants they can squeeze into. Women's blouses often have plunging neck lines and many of them have the cut so low that cleavage is displayed. Halter tops are made to expose their bare waists. And what about those "cut offs" that were once called "hot pants" ? Not to mention skirts and dresses that have a slit up one side to show off their legs.

I could go on and on, but you get the idea.

Obviously, women who dress like that are seeking attention , BUT what exactly are they trying to achieve ? I'm not suggesting that they are prostitutes, but it is true that sometimes it is difficult to tell who is a prostitute, and who is not.

So, what are those women trying to say ?

When you only bring 1 single value to the table, you obviously try to sell it as hard as possible. They know that nobody is going to be with them based on their intelligence, wit, humor, domestic skills, child rearing abilities or their virtue. Because 99% of them don't possess these qualities. On top of that, they're also lying constantly with their implants, fake hair color, layers upon layers of make up, tanning sprays, fake nails and all the other shit.
So they flaunt the only thing that they have of value. It's pretty sad actually.

That's female logic, which is backwards logic.

They're dressed like that to attract attention from the 20% of the male population they consider to be 'men'; that is, the ones who make them tingle. They also dress to outdo each other.

Woman: the most grown-up teenager in the room.

Originally Posted by Loner

We all have heard women/feminists complain that they don't like being treated as sex objects.
I find that rather ironic because women, especially young women, dress with the sexiest clothing they can find.

Think about it. On any public street, at least in western cultures, you will see women wearing the tightest "yoga" pants they can squeeze into. Women's blouses often have plunging neck lines and many of them have the cut so low that cleavage is displayed. Halter tops are made to expose their bare waists. And what about those "cut offs" that were once called "hot pants" ? Not to mention skirts and dresses that have a slit up one side to show off their legs.

I could go on and on, but you get the idea.

Obviously, women who dress like that are seeking attention , BUT what exactly are they trying to achieve ? I'm not suggesting that they are prostitutes, but it is true that sometimes it is difficult to tell who is a prostitute, and who is not.

So, what are those women trying to say ?

It never pays to take women at their literal word.

When they say they don't want to be treated like sex objects, what they mean is they don't want to be spank bank material for ugly guys. But the same women who whine about the sex object thing won't think twice about putting themselves on display to get Chad's attention. And the trademark lack of feminine self-reflection prevents women from seeing the paradox there.

There's also something else going on with yoga pants that you're overlooking. ALL women love those kinds of pants. Because fitted pants don't stretch very much. So, a woman has to maintain a certain figure in order to continue wearing those pants. Yoga pants are a godsend (depending on how you look at it) because they allow women to become total fatasses and they don't have to feel guilty about it because their stretchy yoga pants still fit.

Originally Posted by Eddie Willers

They're dressed like that to attract attention from the 20% of the male population they consider to be 'men'; that is, the ones who make them tingle. They also dress to outdo each other.

Hmm, that's something I had not considered: women trying to outdo each other.

Originally Posted by Eddie Willers

They also dress to outdo each other.

One-time popular and sexy actress Angie Dickinson covered her fan bases with her famous line:

"I dress for women but I undress for men."

Just today I saw two young women in subway, no shoes, jean shorts (very short) and bikini tops. We're 20km from the nearest beach and it wasn't that hot. Every man they saw who looked at them they'd play up to. Look, wear what you want to, but they were just pure attention seeking. It was kinda sad to watch actually.

Originally Posted by Loner

So, what are those women trying to say ?

To you and me? Nothing. They dress like that whenever they leave the house because they never know: today might be the day they run into Chad, or Billy BetaBucks. The clothes are for them, and they wish with all their malicious and fearful little hearts that it was outright illegal for you and me to notice them, or even to be out on the street at all.

Rev 12:12 "Woe to the earth and the sea, because the devil has come down to you with great fury, because he knows his time is short."

Originally Posted by Mr Wombat

To you and me? Nothing. They dress like that whenever they leave the house because they never know: today might be the day they run into Chad, or Billy BetaBucks. The clothes are for them, and they wish with all their malicious and fearful little hearts that it was outright illegal for you and me to notice them, or even to be out on the street at all.

Rev 12:12 "Woe to the earth and the sea, because the devil has come down to you with great fury, because he knows his time is short."

The conceit in some of the women I see is so strong they should tie cement blocks to their feet (stop them from floating away). If they had eraser vision, I wouldn't be here writing this!

It's only objectification if the man attracted to them is someone she doesn't want. If it's an attractive dude with a lot of money who's attracted to her, that's not objectification at all. In short, feminists have decided that male sexuality is evil if it's men they don't find attractive. But male sexuality is great if they want the guy.

Honestly, the best possible thing that could happen would be if a woman flaunts her body and NO ONE pays any attention. If every dude ignored her, that would be perfect. However, with all the simp lame brains out there, that ain't going to happen.

Obligatory Hooters meme:

Originally Posted by Faramir

Obligatory Hooters meme:

Reminds me of the shit they were giving to the Gold Coast Meter Maids!

Hot looking women= BAD!

Hog looking women= GOOD!

They can run that by my cock a thousand times and not once will my cock agree!

Cock knows good pussy when he sees it! Stands at attention every time!

Originally Posted by Loner

Hmm, that's something I had not considered: women trying to outdo each other.

In a society where monogamy is generally expected, women have to one up each other to attract the most high value men. It's a competition for them. And make no mistake about it, they take it very seriously. To the winner goes the fancy wedding, the expensive honeymoon and the eventual divorce settlement.

But feminine hypergamy allows women to share their man. This is why Chad or a rich man can get away with being openly unfaithful. Because a woman would rather share an alpha than have a beta all to herself. Marvel not that Jackie Kennedy tolerated her husband's dalliances with various hookers. Because in the end, SHE was the one married to the President; not them.

The only time other women truly become a threat to her is when they're hotter than she is. As hot as Jackie Kennedy might've been, even she couldn't compete with Marilyn Monroe... which is why Marilyn Monroe and JFK never had much more than a brief fling. Because hookers were one thing. But Jackie wasn't about to let Marilyn compete for the prize. So, she put her foot down.

All of you need to remember that women don't have female friends; they have enemies with whom they've negotiated a ceasefire. But that ceasefire can (and will) end abruptly under the right circumstances.

When a woman goes out in public looking smoking hot, she's peacocking for other women. In a sense, she's throwing down the gauntlet. The other women (the also-rans) will be catty about her behind her back because they resent being outclassed. "What a bitch, just look at her, who tf does she think she is?" when the hot girl isn't within earshot. But when they're face-to-face, it's all girly hugs and "omg it's so good to see you!"

The hot girl is no victim either. Inwardly, she looks at the also-ran women and thinks "Fuck, why are they even here if they're not going to at least try, what a bunch of lazy cunts! Chad better notice me rather than them or there will be hell to pay!"

Originally Posted by mgtower

Cock knows good pussy when he sees it!

Ah yes, but the cock has only one eye. It sees only the here and now. It does not see what tomorrow will look like:


(Warning: eye bleach may be needed!)

Female double-think. By far the foremost value of a woman is her appearance, how attractive she is. Feminism and modern society has convinced her superficially at least that it isn't, so she can never admit this but I think most women know this deep down otherwise they wouldn't dress provocatively and wouldn't be so painfully sensitive about their appearance.

For example, if there's no value in your appearance why would you be upset if someone criticises it? Why don't you just laugh it off after all it's not important right? Like if somebody said I sucked at tennis, who cares, I'm not a tennis player. So they must be aware on some level how much their worth is tied to their appearence.

Of course women flaunt their beauty, especially in their youth, at least most of them anyway. It's a valuable asset and highly sought after, so of course their going to leverage that. It's a depreciating asset and they must capitalize early and often. Just like men try to accumulate wealth and status and flaunt that. That's nature, even if we don't like it.

The hypocrisy lies in when they act like the attention is unwanted. Even if it is unwanted (no one likes dealing with unsavory strangers) they know full well what the catalyst for such attention was. They're essentially fishing for validation and high value males, it's just they often catch the attention of low value males which leads to undesired interactions and protestations of "dont treat me like an object!"

Some really interesting replies. I totally agree about women competing with each other for the attentions of Chad and/or Martin Mega-Bucks.

I never paid much attention to the "Red Carpet" at the Oscar's, Emmy Awards etc., but it is quite clear just how intense the competition can get. Those women spend thousands of dollars for a dress that they will wear only once.

Originally Posted by Mr Wombat

To you and me? Nothing. They dress like that whenever they leave the house because they never know: today might be the day they run into Chad, or Billy BetaBucks. The clothes are for them, and they wish with all their malicious and fearful little hearts that it was outright illegal for you and me to notice them, or even to be out on the street at all.

I always wondered just exactly why my Ex spent so much time, as she said, "Putting on my face". She never , ever left the house without spending at least 45 minutes "putting on her face". Not even on the weekend and going to the corner grill for breakfast. Kinda makes me wonder if she had, in the back of her mind, been thinking of up grading me.

Yoga pants, low cut tops, exposed midriffs and the shortest short shorts ever, with the perspective that red pill knowledge gives and especially being MGTOW I don't see any attractive women at all, I see a poor desperate people in such need of validation that they go around almost half naked for just one look from absolutely anyone. When I see a woman dressed half modestly that does way more to draw my eye than what is fast becoming essentially a small sliver of duct tape over their privates, just screams desperation and nothing else to me.