Thread: NATURE: Researchers Voice Dismay At All-Male Science Nobels by Steve Sailer

From Nature:

All seven winners of this year’s science prizes were men. Some say this shows a disappointing lack of progress towards diversifying the awards.


by Katharine Sanderson


Note that by science, they mean physics, chemistry, and medicine/physiology, but not economics. Whether economics is even a Nobel Prize or not is a separate question.


The decision to award this year’s science Nobel prizes exclusively to men has been met with an outpouring of frustration and disappointment from scientists . . . .
Full article: https://vdare.com/posts/nature-resea...science-nobels

Hey, math is hard...maybe they should be given a 'Runner-Up Nobel.'

Hey, lets lower the bar and/or change the criteria so that more women can get awards!

Originally Posted by CPRA

Some say this shows a disappointing lack of progress towards diversifying the awards.

...

The decision to award this year’s science Nobel prizes exclusively to men has been met with an outpouring of frustration and disappointment from scientists

Disappointing? Its merely equality based on merit.

>>NOBEL IMBALANCE. Of the more than 600 Nobel medals awarded in scientific disciplines, just 23 have gone to women.

If women want to be awarded Nobel Prizes, then they should increase their contribution to Science instead of taking Gender Studies.

The alternative is to simply give women awards for having a vagina - it waters down the significance of the award in favour of pandering to women's feelings.

I'm going to rant here - we're told by President Biden: "there’s not a single thing a man can do that a woman can’t do as well or better". We're told by President Obama that women are "indisputably better" than men and that there would be "significant improvement across the board" if countries were led by women.

The media floods us messages that women are smarter (Forbes: Why Women Are Smarter Than Men), stronger (BBC: Women really are stronger than men; Esquire: Women are biologically stronger than men), better leaders (Independent: Women are better leaders than men), tougher (Nature: When the Going gets tough, women are tougher than men), etc, etc, ad nauseum.

We deny reality to pander to women and their feelings.

The reality is right there slapping their faces - in Olympic times/distances/records for men verses for women.
Its in IQ scores (Intelligence: is there a sex difference in IQ scores? - PubMed (nih.gov))
Its in the productivity and number of scientific papers submitted by men vs for women (Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines | PNAS).
Its in the wage-gap, where men are more productive, work longer hours, choose riskier professions and are more demanding for pay raises than women.

The fact is on average women are generally weaker, stupider and lazier than men, but society/people (in general) don't want to offend their feelings thus its not enough to just keep quiet when it comes to data that shows men are better, but we are forced to lie and chant repeatedly 'Women are Better! Women are Better!', and make it wrong-think for anyone to point out otherwise by paying SJW 'researchers' to tilt all the men vs women studies to examine only the narrow age range between 11-14 years old where girls have the pubertal advantage and boys do not, all in order to show that women are stronger, smarter, etc.

And then we'll silence/fire anyone who dares to point out the lie, people like Alessandro Strumia, James Damore.

Then when everyone is fed the lies and truth is silenced, then comes the Government-mandated gender quotas for companies, for directorships, for senior management positions, etc. because women who are 'better in every way than men' still somehow need a helping hand to get an advantage over men.

And we will be bombarded with even more lies about having some 'old boys club' (patriarchy) which explains why so few women are in leadership positions and even more lies about why women are 'discouraged' since birth from going into high-paying STEM fields, thus justifying the female-only quotas and scholarships.

So we start with ONE simple lie to make women feel better, and I get that fathers don't want to make their daughters feel bad or feel inferior to men, I get it, but now we're piling on more and more lies to defend the original lie.

We're cooking up studies, we're forcing data to tilt in favour of women, we're changing the way students are graded to reward girls attendance more and weigh boy's tests scores less, we're creating lies about some patriarchy and old boys club, and lies about systemic discrimination against women, we're heaping more and more lies on top of each lie, we're forcing women-only STEM scholarships, forcing gender-quotas on companies, forcing senior management quotas, forcing directorship quotas, all just so that the truth doesn't come to the surface. It is sheer lunacy!

/rant over

Some guy mixes nitroglycerine and million year old seashells, blows up everything from hard rocks to people and suddenly he's an expert on who's who?

He's lucky he wasn't born in 1963, they'd have his head on a pike!

If women want to be awarded Nobel Prizes, then they should increase their contribution to Science instead of taking Gender Studies.

Or they could be awarded "Gender Studies Nobel Prizes" if they actually made the Gender Studies courses something serious and honest instead of the bullshit, brainwashing courses that they are.

Originally Posted by johnsmith79

The fact is on average women are generally weaker, stupider and lazier than men

Mostly lazier. If you have tits, you have to be a real paragon of drive and determination to not accept the free ride through life. They are out there - some have Nobel prizes - but people in general mostly aren't like that. Men earn more than women because we have to.

Making some of them identifying as woman at that ceremony day. And all is set.

Originally Posted by johnsmith79

I'm going to rant here - we're told by President Biden: "there’s not a single thing a man can do that a woman can’t do as well or better". We're told by President Obama that women are "indisputably better" than men and that there would be "significant improvement across the board" if countries were led by women.

Let's not act like republican presidents are better in this regard....

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/...lly-sot-ac.cnn

I'm apolitical so fuck all these yellow-backs that reside on different sides of the same coin. Fuck ALL of them.

Originally Posted by bokie

Or they could be awarded "Gender Studies Nobel Prizes" if they actually made the Gender Studies courses something serious and honest instead of the bullshit, brainwashing courses that they are.

But Redpill knowledge is the real Gender Studies.