I disagree. It's called hypergamy, and it is part of female nature. Female nature was forged through out time by evolution. If females had not found high achieving men attractive humans would likely have died out a long time ago. The high status, high achieving man was better able to support them while they were baring children. Higher achieving, healthy men would/should have better genes for the offspring also. She can't do anything about her own genes, but she can choose who she mates with. Mating with the village idiot would be a major waste of her resources, kids are a major drain on women's resources, historically he would not be able to support them also. I'm talking pre +70 yrs ago.
Women don't have to show female nature, but the odds are high they will at some point.
Please don't take offence in my comment, I'm not calling anyone names. I'm only trying to use examples.
Some women will look at the potential a man has (younger) and will jump on for the ride. It seems more in the last few years they ride the CC and then wait at the finish line, when the man has shown he is a top achiever.
Hypergamy, Shit-Tests, and All Women Are Like That - YouTube