Thread: A MGTOW response to #metoo

It occurred to me that the simplest response to #metoo is #youtoo. Yes all women are like that and a simple reversal of the hashtag illustrates it very well because of the juxtaposition. Why are men walking away? Because #youtoo.

I'd prefer #rolleyes #whatever. It highlights the desensitization the #metoo has caused.

#fleetoo

In one sense #metoo has been a blessing. I heard in South Korea, now women are banned from working with men. They separated the offices. This is fantastic news.

I say we need more #metoo so the genders can truly be separate.

Originally Posted by Opaque

In one sense #metoo has been a blessing. I heard in South Korea, now women are banned from working with men. They separated the offices. This is fantastic news.

I say we need more #metoo so the genders can truly be separate.

Really ?!! This is soo fkn amazing. Too bad I dont think it will spread as fast as I'd like it to be, but still, awesome start ! Gotta google around to search for it, especially on some feminist news sites, the QQ gonna feel good !!

Originally Posted by rkspsm

Really ?!! This is soo fkn amazing. Too bad I dont think it will spread as fast as I'd like it to be, but still, awesome start ! Gotta google around to search for it, especially on some feminist news sites, the QQ gonna feel good !!

Sorry but I may have exaggerated. It is not a law, but I know that in reposes to #metoo; now women in South Korea are being kept at a distance and some office have separated; even women and men on different floors. This is good news indeed!

Originally Posted by Opaque

Sorry but I may have exaggerated. It is not a law, but I know that in reposes to #metoo; now women in South Korea are being kept at a distance and some office have separated; even women and men on different floors. This is good news indeed!

Yeah !! I got excited and started searching like crazy !! Its too good to be true (I mean an actual law), this early. But yeah, even if its not a law, its a very good start !

Originally Posted by rkspsm

Yeah !! I got excited and started searching like crazy !! Its too good to be true (I mean an actual law), this early. But yeah, even if its not a law, its a very good start !

There is good reason to be optimistic actually.
In Russia, feminism is considered a mental disease (this is also hearsay, so I need to check it as well).

Japanese companies are also responding to #metoo by not inviting women to lunches, after work dinners and other social activities. They prefer to hire men anyway, but it is going to get real heard for these cunts.

Women need to rely on sexual services if they want to survive the 21st century.

Originally Posted by Opaque

There is good reason to be optimistic actually.
In Russia, feminism is considered a mental disease (this is also hearsay, so I need to check it as well).

Japanese companies are also responding to #metoo by not inviting women to lunches, after work dinners and other social activities. They prefer to hire men anyway, but it is going to get real heard for these cunts.

Women need to rely on sexual services if they want to survive the 21st century.

I cant be optimistic about Japan, they are gonna blow themselves up just like the west. They have some weird practices. Lookup for this word "okozukai" if you dont know already. Its the concept of pocket money of husband. No its not the money which wife earns and gives to husband. The husband is supposed to give all money to wife to "manage". She then gives a small amount to the man to spend on himself. This is beyond pathetic. I cannot respect a culture which does that.

Originally Posted by Opaque

In one sense #metoo has been a blessing. I heard in South Korea, now women are banned from working with men. They separated the offices. This is fantastic news.

I say we need more #metoo so the genders can truly be separate.

That is good news for men! The companies will profit from better productivity and work environment. The companies will also be able to figure out what areas actually make money and what areas are losing money.

#metoo will continue to bite whimyn in the ass. With gender segregation in the near future, it will really hurt whimyn because they will loose access to a large pool of potential divorce-rape victims. I do believe most people still meet their spouses at work.

The future is more wine aunts!

Lookup for this word "okozukai" if you dont know already.

This has been going on for centuries actually. Women in Japan, have historically held the purse strings.

It was not uncommon for a housewife to take care of the accounting and payment for sexual services of a prostitute. (LOL imagine your wife calling the prostitute whom you sleep with a day before to make payment). Women were diligent with money back then.

Now, this 'okozukai' culture means he gets around £30 a day to spend and the rest for her to go out shopping and buying expensive shit that she doesn't need.

Originally Posted by Boar

That is good news for men! The companies will profit from better productivity and work environment. The companies will also be able to figure out what areas actually make money and what areas are losing money.

#metoo will continue to bite whimyn in the ass. With gender segregation in the near future, it will really hurt whimyn because they will loose access to a large pool of potential divorce-rape victims. I do believe most people still meet their spouses at work.

The future is more wine aunts!

The problem is white knight MD's. My office is full of cunts and the white knight MD prefers it that way.

Originally Posted by rkspsm

The husband is supposed to give all money to wife to "manage". She then gives a small amount to the man to spend on himself.

This is the way the west used to work. For working people, anyway. The man bought the money in, the wife maintained the home. Food, clothes, kids, even paying the bills. Housekeeping was a full-time job and a lifelong career. A respected and necessary job.

The song 'Respect' was written by Otis Redding. "I'm gonna give you all my money, and all I'm asking in return honey, is a little respect when I get home." This is how people used to live. It was traditional and normal. As a man, you'd work all day at a hard and sometimes risky job, all of the money with the exception of a little tobacco money would go to the wife, and in return the entire business of having a home and family to come home to would be managed and taken care of. Food on the table and a couple of well-behaved kids (that were actually yours). In theory, anyway.

But now? A woman no longer has to spend six hours on laundry day wrestling with a mangle and tons of wet cotton. Wash day is a matter of loading things into a washer/dryer. Food prep is a matter of driving to a supermarket. Childcare is mostly driving the kids to school.

I've said many times, and I'll repeat it once more: feminism's shrill claim that the male role is obsolete is sheer projection. In reality, it's the female role that has been stripped away. No-one really needs a wife anymore. The job has been taken over by household robots.

Originally Posted by Mr Wombat

This is the way the west used to work. For working people, anyway. The man bought the money in, the wife maintained the home. Food, clothes, kids, even paying the bills. Housekeeping was a full-time job and a lifelong career. A respected and necessary job.

The song 'Respect' was written by Otis Redding. "I'm gonna give you all my money, and all I'm asking in return honey, is a little respect when I get home." This is how people used to live. It was traditional and normal. As a man, you'd work all day at a hard and sometimes risky job, all of the money with the exception of a little tobacco money would go to the wife, and in return the entire business of having a home and family to come home to would be managed and taken care of. Food on the table and a couple of well-behaved kids (that were actually yours). In theory, anyway.

I see, it makes sense. Thanks for explanation, I always wondered why that strange practice exists in the first place.

Originally Posted by Mr Wombat

This is the way the west used to work. For working people, anyway. The man bought the money in, the wife maintained the home. Food, clothes, kids, even paying the bills. Housekeeping was a full-time job and a lifelong career. A respected and necessary job.

The song 'Respect' was written by Otis Redding. "I'm gonna give you all my money, and all I'm asking in return honey, is a little respect when I get home." This is how people used to live. It was traditional and normal. As a man, you'd work all day at a hard and sometimes risky job, all of the money with the exception of a little tobacco money would go to the wife, and in return the entire business of having a home and family to come home to would be managed and taken care of. Food on the table and a couple of well-behaved kids (that were actually yours). In theory, anyway.

But now? A woman no longer has to spend six hours on laundry day wrestling with a mangle and tons of wet cotton. Wash day is a matter of loading things into a washer/dryer. Food prep is a matter of driving to a supermarket. Childcare is mostly driving the kids to school.

I've said many times, and I'll repeat it once more: feminism's shrill claim that the male role is obsolete is sheer projection. In reality, it's the female role that has been stripped away. No-one really needs a wife anymore. The job has been taken over by household robots.

I grew up in the 60s and 70s, and the working man handing over his wage packet to the wife was certainly a thing, but it wasn't an unbroken law. In my home it was Dad who managed the household expenses, and it wasn't that unusual. He was better at it, and my mother knew it.

The big difference between then and now, was that the law hadn't yet determined on which genitalia-bearer was the designated finance manager. Couples could determine for themselves what worked best for them, and if they tried going to the courts with a dispute, they'd probably get told 'not the court''s business'. Same as the police used to say 'not our concern' with every domestic conflict.

That's all gone of course. Domestic arrangements have now been regulated so that whatever conflict arises, there's a legal and police response ready for it (and it's not good if you're a man). I can't think of anything more unlikely to survive the rigours of evolutionary pressure than institutions that have 100% predictable outcomes - and the declining marriage rate is testimony to this.

Fortunately, like all natural processes, all one has to do is assume some clandestine alternative path for oneself, and the likelihood of witnessing the death of a dying species (marriage and family) becomes very high indeed.

Don't think every wife found her husbands check in the lunchbox every two weeks. Some guys wanted to be married during the week and still party on weekends. Their wives got what was left, and it wasn't much. I'm sure glad my father never pulled this shit, but a lot a guys did. Nothing much ever happened to these assholes either, it was a different time. Single moms weren't a dime a dozen like today. I don't remember any single dads though there might a been a few. Their problem was they had to be at work before school started, and usually were still there when school got out. Without help a single guy with kids couldn't make it.