Thread: Manosphere is wrong about polygamy + why I'm all for it

https://www.express.co.uk/life-style...gamy-exclusive

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-...s-its-26981747

This is what usually happens. The women just marry 1 male and he ends up getting multiple wives, while the rest
are incels. I do believe that poly is probably our natural order in regards to relationships, but society will become
hyper imbalanced, even more than it is right now with the amount of MK-ultra'd females, who have been
brainwashed to only accept certain types of men.

A lot of men will feel enraged that a man can have multiple wives, these men will be killed very often, and will
lead to a very bad society as they found out pre-Viking days.

Originally Posted by Edwardhaskell

Hell, I've met plenty of single women in their 40s that are completely cool with their teenage kids having unlimited access to weed. Absolutely blows my mind.

Not a surprise when one considers how readily women will drug up young boys so they're zombies in school.

Originally Posted by WheelBarrow

Not a surprise when one considers how readily women will drug up young boys so they're zombies in school.

I've known more than a few women that basically have their own pharmacy (including psychotropic drugs and prescription pain killers)...no surprise they'll drug up their sons. Makes parenting easier I guess.

Regardless of what type of Polygamy it is I think it favors the woman more than the man. The woman gets to have company if it multiple female partners or providers and protector's if they are men. I think it is important to remember that women have a far easier time finding partners than men do. So whenever I see a man say he is in an open relationship, I know that he is seeing 1 other person to his woman's 3 or 4!

Originally Posted by Kryptic

Regardless of what type of Polygamy it is I think it favors the woman more than the man. The woman gets to have company if it multiple female partners or providers and protector's if they are men. I think it is important to remember that women have a far easier time finding partners than men do. So whenever I see a man say he is in an open relationship, I know that he is seeing 1 other person to his woman's 3 or 4!

That's right. Men by nature want to be providers so the woman gets multiple men she can call on to do things. With 3+ men in her circle she can have a man to cut the grass, a man to make repairs on the house, a man to get money from, 3-4x the gifts, etc. I've heard it said that women like to extract what they need from people so polygamy amps that up a bit.

Polyandry = one wife, multiple husbands. It's typically only seen in high male, low female population environments in a frontier environment

It works because there simply aren't enough females of any kind - good, bad, ugly - to go around, but it usually ends fairly quickly, mostly due to in-migration as that frontier becomes safer and more developed and word gets out there is a surplus of resource-rich husbands there (in earlier eras at least).

One of the reasons common law marriages are mostly found in the Western USA is due to the demographic disparity between Men and Women in the 19th.

Originally Posted by Montauk

Polyandry = one wife, multiple husbands.

What do you call 5 husbands sucking the tits of one wife?

Simplets.

Originally Posted by ShogunRonin

I do not support a poly relationship culture and let me tell you why..

They tried this many hundreds of years ago. What they found was multiple women were just marrying Chad Thundercock, and he was
getting groups of women. It solves the problem of women being unable to get Chad to commit, but it in turn creates a dangerous society.
This led to society becoming very violent and it led to the formulation of The Vikings. The Vikings then went off
to other places to steal women and riches. You could say The Vikings were actually the original Incels, although the women were just
going off with the high value men of society.

In theory a poly culture could solve the incels on paper but it doesn't it actually makes the situation worse. Then religion came
along and solved a lot of problems i.e enforced monogamy.

Our culture is as bad as it is due to the de-population agenda being enforced by the United Nations (check the quote from Boris Johnson
from 2007 on his article regarding this) they're raising women up (which i dont have a problem with) but they know that when women
get raised up, they rarely date down, so if they keep men out of university (women out number men going to uni) it creates a population
crash. This is coupled with financial crises which creates a population decline as well along with all types of country war.

A lot of the problems being faced today regarding male/female dynamics is directly caused by the west and its governments. If the government
plays daddy and protects women through welfare, schemes and opportunities, and allows women to climb dominance hierarchies more easily,
then women can treat men like shit which they are doing right now. They are using the media as a weapon for this along with other things.

That's exactly it. Right now our feminazi world thinks it can just shit on frustrated, young men indefinitely. If you legitimize the 99/1 rule even further, you're just going to end up with Elliot Rodgers X 1,000. And, to be 100 percent clear, I'm NOT endorsing getting pissed off like Rodger and going around murdering people. DON'T do that! What I am saying, is the worse they make the shit show, the more danger society is in for violence. They've already been incredibly stupid by legitimizing the feminist hate movement, and adopting all of its man-bashing vocabulary. They're like an idiot who kicks a mean, old dog, then is surprised when they get bitten. They don't like to admit it, but this is where most of these mass shootings are coming from. They've made an entire demographic, young men, angry and frustrated out of their wits. Most of, in fact, almost all of them, will refrain from getting violent. But some of them will do something terrible. It's not right. They should not do that, but some of them are going to go berserk and do that anyway. And society keeps being stupid. They keep kicking that old dog and wondering why something bad keeps happening.

Societies that are polygamous will have a means for unmarried men to get some. It might be legalised prostitution (eg: progressive Europe), religious prostitution (eg, ancient greece/rome), a rule stating that certain classes of women can be raped with impunity (eg: kaffirs and "whores" in islam, slaves in slaveholding societies, anyone not a viking if you are a viking), whatever. Our own society, with effective polygamy, is using porn.

Originally Posted by Edwardhaskell

It seems that just about everything hoisted upon us is destructive and that definitely includes social media. Sometimes I wonder if a person would be better off completely unplugging from society and living far outside the bigger cities. Basically live like it's 1995 or earlier...a basic phone, radio, maybe newspaper delivered but no cable just an antenna. This is how my grandparents lived all their lives until their deaths in 2012 or so...and they seemed much happier than the average person nowadays. Life was so simple at their house.

I think about this a lot too. There is nothing I would like better than to get rid of my smartphone and just have a basic mobile or even a landline. The expectation of being "available" 24/7 is horrible in any context (work, personal relationships, etc). Plus it's concerning to me how much smartphones spy on us, and probably other devices do too. Still, having a web browser and GPS in my pocket is extremely useful and I'll probably need those capabilities until I retire at least.

I haven't had cable in 10 years, I just have a couple of streaming services now. There's barely anything worth watching, but netflix does have a lot of good documentaries on a wide variety of subjects.

Sometimes I think that the internet was a mistake and that I'd be better off without it, but I remember that it's ultimately a tool, in addition to a source of entertainment and information. A tool isn't destructive by nature. It's all about how it's used.

Originally Posted by Hambone

I think about this a lot too. There is nothing I would like better than to get rid of my smartphone and just have a basic mobile or even a landline. The expectation of being "available" 24/7 is horrible in any context (work, personal relationships, etc). Plus it's concerning to me how much smartphones spy on us, and probably other devices do too. Still, having a web browser and GPS in my pocket is extremely useful and I'll probably need those capabilities until I retire at least.

I haven't had cable in 10 years, I just have a couple of streaming services now. There's barely anything worth watching, but netflix does have a lot of good documentaries on a wide variety of subjects.

Sometimes I think that the internet was a mistake and that I'd be better off without it, but I remember that it's ultimately a tool, in addition to a source of entertainment and information. A tool isn't destructive by nature. It's all about how it's used.

It seems like most people including myself can envision this world where life would be better not connected, but we can always rationalize ways to stay connected. I can also visualize the person that goes away from electronics as walking out of some hut in 10 years like one of those long bearded hermits that lives out in the woods lol. Imagine how much that person would've "missed"...better or worse off?

And yes I agree that 24/7 connectivity can negatively impact relationships. For all of history we were able to have solitude when we went away from a place or group of people. For good or bad people couldn't connect with us. Back when I was in relationships with women it was basically a 24/7 communication stream. I'm not sure if people romantically involved are should communicate THAT much. In a few weeks of dating/texting/facetime/calls, people can tell each other as much about themselves as they once did in 6 months of dating. Our attention spans become much shorter and we are off to the next thing to figure out.