Thread: Man soaks homeless postwall woman with garden hose to get her to leave

Originally Posted by MGTOWFOREVER

He is charged with battery? Seriously? I have known people that were attacked , given a concussion, and choked but the only charge was "harassment" which is a summary charge like a traffic ticket!

Battery charge for San Francisco man who sprayed homeless woman with hose (pressdemocrat.com)

From that link:

“The alleged battery of an unhoused member of our community is completely unacceptable. Mr. Gwin will face appropriate consequences for his actions,” District Attorney Brooke Jenkins said

Other than that, I infer her situation is completely acceptable to the District Attorney.

San Francisco Board of Supervisors President Aaron Peskin, whose district includes Jackson Square, called Gwin's actions "unconscionable, it’s abuse.”

“I don’t care how frustrated somebody is, this is not the way human beings treat other human beings,” Peskin told the Chronicle.


Peskin said his office has tried to help the woman, who is known in the neighborhood.

And the article ends on that note.

Well, reporter, since you brought it up, don't stop there. What kind of help? Something better than a water hose, I suspect? Why has his better plan failed to work? Why no attempt to hold Peskin accountable for making no difference in the life of this member of the community? For passing the consequences of his failed policies onto the store owner and others? Is this how he treats other human beings, no more than some medieval kings cared about their peasants?

It's perfectly legal for the Uber rich to harvest America till the streets are full of homeless skells, but don't you piss boys dare do anything to them. When the people who control our fine country land in hell, I hope the devil sticks his pitchfork right where the sun don't shine.

Originally Posted by Unboxxed

From that link:



Other than that, I infer her situation is completely acceptable to the District Attorney.




And the article ends on that note.

Well, reporter, since you brought it up, don't stop there. What kind of help? Something better than a water hose, I suspect? Why has his better plan failed to work? Why no attempt to hold Peskin accountable for making no difference in the life of this member of the community? For passing the consequences of his failed policies onto the store owner and others? Is this how he treats other human beings, no more than some medieval kings cared about their peasants?

I have as much faith and trust in bureaucracies as I do a set of dry rot 4 ply tires manufactured in June, 1964!

A good case in point for my distrust (one of many, many, many, too many) is Dr. Buruzynski's cancer treatment and the FDA's relentless attacks to shut him down.

1.5 hr. documentary:

This story (about the art gallery owner hosing down a homeless woman) happened in San Francisco. The citizens of that town have pretty much no one to blame but themselves for their homeless problem: The citizens of San Francisco keep voting in socialists to run the town (and the state).

Another example of the craziness in San Francisco: Just in the last week or so, the San Francisco authorities voted to give each and every black person in town $5 million in cash. Plus debt forgiveness on all their debts. Plus an allowance for 250 years to allow them to live at middle class standards. All of this is by way of reparations for slavery. And California wasn't even a slave state.

Link about reparations bill: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/san...bt-forgiveness

Naturally, the reparations plan won't go anywhere; San Francisco can't afford it. But it shows what happens when you vote in socialists. Socialists just live in a fantasyland where they imagine they can solve all the world's problems with fantasy legislation.

San Francisco is a hellhole of socialism and homelessness and fantasyland politics. And it's the citizens' own fault.

The problem is not too much socialism, but not enough. Insane people belong in institutions. They need to be humanely locked up. Unfortunately, asylums for the insane are inherently expensive to run and produce no profit, which means the only body that can run them is The State. The State is the only institution that can do something for the public good *because* it is for the public good.

It's not at all a coincidence that you see this sort of thing in the USA and not so much in the rest of the developed world. As it stands, there's money to be made in quietly disappearing homeless people for shopkeepers, gated communities, anyone with a bit of cash.

Originally Posted by Mr Wombat

The problem is not too much socialism, but not enough. Insane people belong in institutions. They need to be humanely locked up. Unfortunately, asylums for the insane are inherently expensive to run and produce no profit, which means the only body that can run them is The State. The State is the only institution that can do something for the public good *because* it is for the public good.

It's not at all a coincidence that you see this sort of thing in the USA and not so much in the rest of the developed world. As it stands, there's money to be made in quietly disappearing homeless people for shopkeepers, gated communities, anyone with a bit of cash.

I'm sure the good socialists of San Francisco have passed dozens or even hundreds of laws that were GUARANTEED to solve the homelessness problem. But like most socialist projects, such laws routinely end up making the problem worse rather than alleviating it. Because US socialists live in fantasyland.

Meantime, "humanely locking up" the homeless would be way too common-sense for US socialists. They would never. It would be un-PC. Someone's feelings might get hurt in the process.

Actually, I read that they do that in Brazil. When the shopkeepers get tired of "Youths" from the favelas coming into the nice areas and robbing, mugging and shoplifting, they pay the local cops for a streetcleaning. The Brazilian cops go around at night, pick up the usual suspects, shoot them, then dump the bodies into dumpsters.

Originally Posted by Mr Wombat

The problem is not too much socialism, but not enough. Insane people belong in institutions. They need to be humanely locked up. Unfortunately, asylums for the insane are inherently expensive to run and produce no profit, which means the only body that can run them is The State. The State is the only institution that can do something for the public good *because* it is for the public good.

It's not at all a coincidence that you see this sort of thing in the USA and not so much in the rest of the developed world. As it stands, there's money to be made in quietly disappearing homeless people for shopkeepers, gated communities, anyone with a bit of cash.

There are four classes in all societies
The rich
The warriors class
The peasant
And the wretch

The rich control the warriors that enforce the rules of the rich. The peasants service the elites desires and whims at the threat of violence and death

But the wretch, they serve a purpose too, they are there to take the blunt of the rage of the peasants. Many cases of homeless being beating or killed even if they aren't on private property.

But because they are wretches, their lives don't matter. They would be better off dead
Do what it takes to not become a wretch unless you want to live ina living hell.

If you can or if you are young enough join the warrior class. If I was younger I would have joined the warrior class. They the ones with power in society.

The one with the most value(real or other wise always win)