Thread: "I'm DESPARATE For A Husband!" | When Modern Women Hit The Wall HARD And Get Desperate

Comments: They want a husband not because they want a partner and to be one half of a relationship between equals. They want a husband because being an adult is hard and they want a responsible man to be the one who gets up every day to do the daily grind of getting the bills paid. In the meantime, they (the women) can spend their days SJWing and whining on Twitter about this or that. And also they will perpetually be shopping for his replacement or at the very least someone with whom to cheat on him.

You guys need to MAN UP! These Postwallers want YOU! LOL

Rides over modern women. No one’s getting married anymore. You’ll be alone for the rest of your lives. You created this environment.

For you dudes out there that didn't get a ton of attention...when these 3s, 4s, and 5s (often with kids and other baggage) hit the wall, mature a little and decide to go husband shopping....don't fucking marry them because you feel good to finally be getting some attention from a woman!

The same can be said for the class of men who now have former 6s, 7s and 8s willing to put them in relationshits/marriage. Let 'em rot.

Originally Posted by Edwardhaskell

For you dudes out there that didn't get a ton of attention...when these 3s, 4s, and 5s (often with kids and other baggage) hit the wall, mature a little and decide to go husband shopping....don't fucking marry them because you feel good to finally be getting some attention from a woman!

As someone who made that mistake (I didn't marry her but did get her pregnant), I echo this message.

I work with a woman who is 38 and is very upset she is still single. She is going to Canada soon to get engaged to a man she has never met! Ticking boxes that is all women do, they want the wedding, the husband etc. Nothing about love or supporting someone just what they want.

So you decide to waste the only things that a man deems valuable and now that you have nothing he wants anymore, suddenly you want him to want you?

You're a fucking dumbass.

The wall is undefeated.

NEXT!

Originally Posted by Kryptic

Ticking boxes that is all women do, they want the wedding, the husband etc. Nothing about love or supporting someone just what they want.

But ticking boxes is love to them... Remember Briffault's Law? A woman doesn't love a man like a man loves a woman, she can't. A woman's love is conditional on how she can benefit from the man. That is female nature.

She is feels the Canadian is a better prospect (she can benefit more) for her, maybe he is... As long as she is not trying to run away from herself....

Originally Posted by RustyNuts

But ticking boxes is love to them... Remember Briffault's Law? A woman doesn't love a man like a man loves a woman, she can't. A woman's love is conditional on how she can benefit from the man. That is female nature.

She is feels the Canadian is a better prospect (she can benefit more) for her, maybe he is... As long as she is not trying to run away from herself....

This woman is a mess, complains about the debt she is in, does heaps of overtime, complains about the over time, buys an expensive handbag. Has so much crap in her house that if she did move to Canada she would either have to sell it at a loss or spend a fortune shipping it over there which is her intent.

Only then to find out Mr Canuck is a serial killer or something..

Originally Posted by Kryptic

This woman is a mess, complains about the debt she is in, does heaps of overtime, complains about the over time, buys an expensive handbag. Has so much crap in her house that if she did move to Canada she would either have to sell it at a loss or spend a fortune shipping it over there which is her intent.

Only then to find out Mr Canuck is a serial killer or something..

Not a good thing that she moves there... Better if he moves here.

I understand Australia has some parts of the country that get cold weather, but it will be nothing like what most of Canada gets.

Good luck to them... At 38 she will be well set in her ways.

Originally Posted by RustyNuts

Not a good thing that she moves there... Better if he moves here.

I understand Australia has some parts of the country that get cold weather, but it will be nothing like what most of Canada gets.

Good luck to them... At 38 she will be well set in her ways.

Yeah she was telling me that in Canada they don't work during winter because it's so harsh. She seems really set on it though, is talking about renouncing her Australian citizenship. A big mistake but it's her life.

We do work in winter here in Canada, some of us even work outside during the winter; or do you think we hibernate like the bears? I mean, do people in Minnesota or Alaska just take the whole winter off? Personally, I don't know how people down south work outside during the summer.

Any of those women can right this second log onto Tinder and take their pick of dozens of men who would commit to a relationship tommorow if asked, problem is these delusion women only want a 6'2 bodybuilding social media influencer or other high status fairytale. No woman in the age of dating apps will ever have problems finding a commited man as long as she lowers her standards.

Obligatory pig girl study - https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...hp?t=168948903

Once women decoupled sex from committed,
They sealed their own fate.

Before when women(generally) only fucked guys that was committed to them marriage was up, families was happy.

Once they started fucking chads for free while demanding everything under the sun from the committed man just to hold her hand(no sex, only responsibilities tee hee)

It was the beginning of the end for marriage.
Now you got more men then ever not getting married or even bothering with women. And with women being well... women they just keep pouring fuel to the fire

Originally Posted by FangBlade

Once women decoupled sex from committed,
They sealed their own fate.

Before when women(generally) only fucked guys that was committed to them marriage was up, families was happy.

Once they started fucking chads for free while demanding everything under the sun from the committed man just to hold her hand(no sex, only responsibilities tee hee)

It was the beginning of the end for marriage.
Now you got more men then ever not getting married or even bothering with women. And with women being well... women they just keep pouring fuel to the fire

Hint:

Sex and commitment were never really coupled (with the odd individual exception).

Oh, it was professed as such I agree to young (and not so young) minds capable of delusion, but in practice?

Do you think that there was ever a time when people (men AND women) didn’t fuck around even within the supposed restrictions of marriage?

If so, do tell.

Originally Posted by Jackoff

Hint:

Sex and commitment were never really coupled (with the odd individual exception).

Oh, it was professed as such I agree to young (and not so young) minds capable of delusion, but in practice?

Do you think that there was ever a time when people (men AND women) didn’t fuck around even within the supposed restrictions of marriage?

If so, do tell.

That why I say generally, people had enough sense to aleast try to not to fuck around back then. There was some level of pressure to try to maintain the family unit. Now it beyond destroyed

Ultimately marriage is just a long form version of prostitution. Everyone understood this but Women decided to simply not hold up their end of the deal. Now they just want the cash but not give up the ass in marriage. Hence the decline in marriage

It's a real bummer that society can't survive like this, but at least I don't have to deal with a parasite know as the wife.

Originally Posted by FangBlade

That why I say generally, people had enough sense to aleast try to not to fuck around back then. There was some level of pressure to try to maintain the family unit. Now it beyond destroyed

I agree with this, but only somewhat.

From my perspective it's not that it didn't happen as much, it's more that they were more circumspect about it. They weren't as brash about it in order to, as you say, maintain the family unit.

As for what has been destroyed, I again agree with you, but just what has been destroyed?

I suggest that the illusion of fidelity has been destroyed and only from accepting reality can one hope to progress.

Originally Posted by Jackoff

I agree with this, but only somewhat.

From my perspective it's not that it didn't happen as much, it's more that they were more circumspect about it. They weren't as brash about it in order to, as you say, maintain the family unit.

As for what has been destroyed, I again agree with you, but just what has been destroyed?

I suggest that the illusion of fidelity has been destroyed and only from accepting reality can one hope to progress.

Obviously the illusion of love and fidelity ain't real in the sense that it natural for humans to do We all of just animals doing what animals do. Doing what ever it takes to survive and reproduce.

But due to cultural influences of reglion and marriage(most often due to arrange marriages), men and women generally worked together out of a duty to the tribe. Hell the idea of a married couples actually loving one another was even a concept until like the last 100 some odd years.

There are always been whores and fuck boys but society heavily punished them to make sure that people don't emulate them. And due to societal pressures most men and women mostly played ball and stuck together.

Once the sexual restraints was removed, people returned to their basic forms of reproduction.

I guess the tldr is, marriage use to work when there was really power and consequences for breaking the marriage. But now that marriage is a joke, no one takes it seriously anymore

Originally Posted by FangBlade

Obviously the illusion of love and fidelity ain't real in the sense that it natural for humans to do We all of just animals doing what animals do. Doing what ever it takes to survive and reproduce.

But due to cultural influences of reglion and marriage(most often due to arrange marriages), men and women generally worked together out of a duty to the tribe. Hell the idea of a married couples actually loving one another was even a concept until like the last 100 some odd years.

There are always been whores and fuck boys but society heavily punished them to make sure that people don't emulate them. And due to societal pressures most men and women mostly played ball and stuck together.

Once the sexual restraints was removed, people returned to their basic forms of reproduction.

I guess the tldr is, marriage use to work when there was really power and consequences for breaking the marriage. But now that marriage is a joke, no one takes it seriously anymore

This makes total sense to explain what we see now. There's really no pressure to be a monogamous person anymore. Marriage is just some antiquated thing some people (mostly women want it) do for fun/attention. Even for people that THINK they are monogamous...are they really monogamous when they've been in 3, 4, 5+ serious relationships/marriages between ages 20-50? That's just some form of having multiple partners but they concentrate on one at a time for a short period instead of having multiple partners simultaneously. Congrats I guess...you don't cheat but you've been married to or played house with 5 men by age 40.

IMO, my grandparents generation was the last time marriage was something that had any semblance of a firm foundation...they were born around 1920 and married by the early 40s. They were from farming families in a rural part of Appalachia so marriage and kids kinda made sense. Marriage has circled the drain since then and now it has been flushed.

Originally Posted by FangBlade

We all of just animals doing what animals do. Doing what ever it takes to survive and reproduce

There is great truth in this statement.

But due to cultural influences of reglion and marriage(most often due to arrange marriages), men and women generally worked together out of a duty to the tribe.

This, I’m afraid is where we must disagree.

Where men and women worked together it wasn’t out of a “duty to the tribe” unless maybe you are going back to the hunter-gatherer era.

But that era has long since passed, for most of us anyway.

Since the evolving of societies there was, until recently, a need to work together because times were hard. War was commonplace, infrastructure was in its infancy so access to basic needs like food was limited.

People simply had to work together in the hope of survival.

Hell the idea of a married couples actually loving one another was even a concept until like the last 100 some odd years.

Yes, the last 100 years or so have shown great changes. With increased transportation abilities people could increasingly rely on foreign produce to feed their bellies and clothe their backs. This lessened personal responsibility to “the tribe” because the tribe was doing just fine, or at least better than it ever was.

And yes, of course there are exceptions but generally speaking this is true.

So, take away the need to stay together out of necessity for security and provision and we are left with nothing other than religion and tradition to keep the family unit together, neither of which are even close to a match for the need to survive. The concept of marriage for love is just a play to keep the failing tradition going.

And so, we get to where we are today, the breakdown of the family unit because it is no longer necessary for survival.

There are always been whores and fuck boys but society heavily punished them to make sure that people don't emulate them.

I’m unsure of the truth of this. Society may have frowned upon such behaviour but punishment? Maybe in some societies this was true, e.g. heavily religious ones, but even then so long as one was discrete it would have been ignored, otherwise everyone would have been persecuted.

And due to societal pressures most men and women mostly played ball and stuck together.

Agreed. For better or worse they stuck together even though they knew the basic premise was a lie, because they had to out of necessity. That necessity is now gone and we can now begin to see people for what they really are with regards relationshits.

Once the sexual restraints was removed, people returned to their basic forms of reproduction.

I guess the tldr is, marriage use to work when there was really power and consequences for breaking the marriage. But now that marriage is a joke, no one takes it seriously anymore

Yup!

Originally Posted by Jackoff

There is great truth in this statement.



This, I’m afraid is where we must disagree.

Where men and women worked together it wasn’t out of a “duty to the tribe” unless maybe you are going back to the hunter-gatherer era.

But that era has long since passed, for most of us anyway.

Since the evolving of societies there was, until recently, a need to work together because times were hard. War was commonplace, infrastructure was in its infancy so access to basic needs like food was limited.

People simply had to work together in the hope of survival.



Yes, the last 100 years or so have shown great changes. With increased transportation abilities people could increasingly rely on foreign produce to feed their bellies and clothe their backs. This lessened personal responsibility to “the tribe” because the tribe was doing just fine, or at least better than it ever was.

And yes, of course there are exceptions but generally speaking this is true.

So, take away the need to stay together out of necessity for security and provision and we are left with nothing other than religion and tradition to keep the family unit together, neither of which are even close to a match for the need to survive. The concept of marriage for love is just a play to keep the failing tradition going.

And so, we get to where we are today, the breakdown of the family unit because it is no longer necessary for survival.



I’m unsure of the truth of this. Society may have frowned upon such behaviour but punishment? Maybe in some societies this was true, e.g. heavily religious ones, but even then so long as one was discrete it would have been ignored, otherwise everyone would have been persecuted.



Agreed. For better or worse they stuck together even though they knew the basic premise was a lie, because they had to out of necessity. That necessity is now gone and we can now begin to see people for what they really are with regards relationshits.



Yup!

Haha I think we are on the same chapter but 2 pages apart. But I get it now,

What you mentioned about necessity for marriage is right in the money. Once the need is gone, people ain't gonna do it anymore.

back in the more interdependent days, stepping out of line with the tradition/religion was basically a death sentence due to being kicked out of the collective.

so people for the most part generally play along(stealth whores/fuck boys aside)

Now in the independent age, no one really needs any one to survive. So thus marriage falls away

My understanding of theses things have deepen, thanks