Thread: "If Looks Could Kill" Elliot Rogers propaganda reaches Great White North. Anti PUA, Anti MRA

Taken from the liberalest out of all liberal publications.
This magazine is so liberal, it was probably paid for by welfare.

If looks could kill | NOW Magazine

They get it wrong in the first sentence!

"If looks could kill
The attitudes Elliot Rodger expressed about women are extreme, but his sense of male entitlement to women’s bodies is not just something he got from pick-up artists’ websites"

Heh, I remember when this was a nerds/social outcasts issue, now it's an mra/sexism issue. Women love to exaggerate danger. One guy goes crazy and kills some people, ahd suddenly "MRA/NERDS/MEN ARE MOBILIZING! FEMALE GENOCIDE INCOMING!" Funny how they make no effort to help their sisters overseas, they're getting raped like it's an olympic sport over in India. I guess it'd take to much effort.

A lot of these articles write merely about the misogynistic points of views that Rodger expressed, but when you read the manifesto you realize that he hated men just the same. But the misandric perspectives that Rodger expressed don't get mentioned. I wonder why?

Just a disclaimer -- I don't believe the PUA stuff works at all. But elliot rodger was actually a member on puahate.com meaning he didn't believe it either. He was seeing psychiatrists since he was like 5 years old they are just trying to brand the manosphere as a cesspool of creeps/psychos. I've watched his manifesto videos and it's obvious he had illusions of grandeur where he would keep saying he was "magnifcient" and the "perfect gentlemen". He probably went up to girls acting all crazy and girls are much less tolerant of crazy than guys are.

There is a lot of this "You are not entitled to sex" going on by these bluepillers. No sane redpill guy believes they are. But women want certain things from men without giving them anything and then that's where we call bullshit. Most women spend their best women all chasing the same guy, and when they grow old now we are supposed to marry them? You see a million articles on the site where women feel entitled for commitment. From single moms, post wall carousel-riders, and women with impossibly high standards. To them I want to say that You are not entitled to commitment.

Originally Posted by Isaiah4:1

"If looks could kill
The attitudes Elliot Rodger expressed about women are extreme, but his sense of male entitlement to women’s bodies is not just something he got from pick-up artists’ websites"

I think this quote is more offensive

PUA and men’s rights websites are far from obscure online communities where only the criminally deranged gather.

Although I agree PUAs are criminally deranged predators who wish to wander around and harass women with pickup lines desperately trying to lure them into sex lol.

Although I agree PUAs are criminally deranged predators who wish to wander around and harass women with pickup lines desperately trying to lure them into sex lol.

Well, I'm not sure where to begin with this one. I can assure you I am not a PUA, but this statement is certainly not up to the standards we have here. Especially for a first post.

Busted.

Originally Posted by mr.anonymous

Well, I'm not sure where to begin with this one. I can assure you I am not a PUA, but this statement is certainly not up to the standards we have here. Especially for a first post.

Busted.

taking classes on approaching random women for sex is social degenerate behavior.

Originally Posted by UltWpn

taking classes on approaching random women for sex is social degenerate behavior.

Sweetheart, this thought process of yours equating men to nothing more than sexual predators has an effective range of approximately 0 meters.

"Creepy". Well certain other adjectives come to mind. Bossy. Demanding. Bitchy. Fat.

And of course, my new favorite:

Banned.

A quote from one comment on that site:

The UCSB shooter claimed to be an "incel". In reality, it's nothing more than a bunch of bitter little boys with poor social skills who can't take a look in the mirror and realize that the reason why they do so poorly with women is because they're misogynistic, anti-social creeps with shitty personalities.

Hmmm...anti-social creeps with shitty personalities....that´s why they can´t get a woman. I wonder why exactly the same character flaws does not prevent women from getting laid. Oh...maybe it is because women don´t need any social skills to pick up men?

I only read the first few paragraphs of that article. They fail to look at the whole picture. The fact alone that there is something like a pickup-community and that some men are willing to pay 2,000 $ for a workshop that teaches them how to communicate and flirt with women should tell you how fucked up the dating scene is and how absurd the expectations of most women are those days. Even average women demand skills from men who approach them that they themself to not posess. A lot of women are very awkward socially and they do not need a refinde character to be successfull with the opposite sex. But still they demand those traits from men.

Rodger Elliot was a very disturbed individual whose main problem was that he put women on a pedestal. He saw women as the ultimate goal and his whole existence was focused on getting laid. I am not a fan of pickup but at least most of those guys have realized that women are not special. They are just human beings.

And to put PUA and the MRA in the same category shows that the author of that article either doesn´t know anything about MRAs in the first place....or he has an agenda to smear the image of the MRM. The latter is more plausible in my opinion, especially if you consider that the author lives in canada, a feminist hot-spot.

ironically, in death, he is exactly what women crave.

No point in even reading that article, the hatred of men runs deep here and the push to make the pedestal of the princess ever higher, and ever shinier runs through every part of our society.. We are starting to reap what has been sown, the complaints from women are growing that men are more and more often, uneducated and unmotivated spending all their time playing around while showing little to no interest in settling down and starting a family.

That magazine is Toronto based.
Need I say more?
It is a weekly free magazine, ironically known for the 15-20 pages of rub joint/escort ads at the back.
I can't believe how badly they messed up the facts. All it took was one look at the opening line. Rogers hated PUA's. I am not a fan of PUA's either but that's because I'm not into adjusting my behaviour or jumping through any hoops just to get women. To each his own I guess. But Elliot hated PUA's because he was jealous of them. And I don't know where they got this MRA connection from, but its a good sign. Based on the recent publication's I've seen, it appears the MRA/Red Pill/ PUA community is growing steadily. This could spell death for the feminist wymyn entitlement syndrome. Negative attention is still attention. No amount of name calling stopped the community from growing exponentially ever since this shooting.
This article is nothing but the verbal equivalent of "Gay Bowel Syndrome" coming from a classic Toronto mangina.

Originally Posted by Isaiah4:1

And I don't know where they got this MRA connection from, but its a good sign. Based on the recent publication's I've seen, it appears the MRA/Red Pill/ PUA community is growing steadily. This could spell death for the feminist wymyn entitlement syndrome. Negative attention is still attention. No amount of name calling stopped the community from growing exponentially ever since this shooting.

actually, I do wonder if this is another form of feminist projection.

every single prominent feminist that has ever lived was a psychopathic wingnut that made the feminist cause look worse. when people want to discredit feminism, all they need to do is point to the leaders of their movement themselves.

women desperately need a target for the men's rights movement, but all the prominent players are either manginas, women, or even former feminists. the MRM really got the cream of the crop when it came to gender conflict.

so now, elliot rodger must be shoehorned into the position of "prominent MRA" by feminists. the mainstream media will assist them in the shoehorning process, because feminism is a hard left political movement.

The key is that the feminism is part of the hard left movement. We really need to be constantly aware of this fact. They are not acting alone and feminism is not serving women. Women think it is serving them; being the useful idiots they are.

feminism is communism in bras (even though most of the femi-commies are braless and hairy-pitted).