Thread: "Hey, wait a minute! The wealthy men don't want to get married."

Have you guys noticed whether or not any women have had the revelation expressed in my title? It's ironic that women demand to be with a wealthy man, but then they encourage a system where the wealthier a man is, the worse idea marriage is. The bigger your pile of wealth, the more that can come crashing down via divorce. A poor man does risk his emotional well-being if he marries, but women don't marry poor men. Feminists have fought to release women from their gender roles while holding men to ours. A man is even more expected to provide wealth than he was in the past.

Men don't even have to come to our MGTOW forum, or some other one, to figure out that marriage is a rotten deal. And it gets worse the wealthier you become! You could work for decades to build a great career as a detective, and be a year away from a good pension, only to have half of it robbed away from you via divorce. You could build up a big pile of wealth to be set on as an attorney, only to have a woman rob half of it plus alimony plus outrageously high child support. Then suddenly you're left with far less than you started out with as a first-year associate.

They want to marry the rich men, but then they do everything in their power to make marriage a terrible deal for rich men. They could marry a poor man, but then they might be the ones who end up owing them money.

Yet, not once have I ever known a woman to have the revelation, "Hey wait a minute! We're scaring the rich men away!"

Not that I care. I've long been disgusted by how transactional women's love is. I don't even consider it to be love if it's conditioned on money. Hence, the MGTOW refrain "Women are incapable of loving men" to be totally true.

Lol Women are an anti-asset, the more you invest the more you stand to lose.

Originally Posted by FangBlade

Lol Women are an anti-asset, the more you invest the more you stand to lose.

I truly believe most of them cannot be satisfied. They can out-spend any amount of money that it's possible to make. Even Bill Gates' wife divorced him. I wonder how she's doing finding a man richer than him.

Originally Posted by TigPlaze

"Women are incapable of loving men" to be totally true.

Correct, they love how the man (and the recourses he has) can make them feel. They make their decision based on their feeling, small kids do this as well, small kids also shit on the carpet.

Women were, and are always on the lookout for a guy with his own place, preferably a house with a garden. Do i hear someone scream McMension in the back?

Now, this is becoming harder and harder for the young generation to own anything themselves, ''difficult to start'' is becoming the norm, and the smarter gals are trying to get their razor sharp claws embedded in the second best thing:

Single guys, preferably only child, working in STEM, living in their moms basement. Since they are making high income and spend jack shit on housing so they have to be loaded and that money ... they could spend it on .... Le GuRLz right? RIGHT?!

Yeah, no thanks. Stay clear fella's, we gotta stay focussed.

Investing money in a woman is like investing money in a depreciating asset that will never stop depreciating through its lifetime. By the time she inevitably leaves, you don't even get your starting investment capital back. Nobody in their right financial mind would invest in such a thing.

Originally Posted by Chris007

Investing money in a woman is like investing money in a depreciating asset that will never stop depreciating through its lifetime. By the time she inevitably leaves, you don't even get your starting investment capital back. Nobody in their right financial mind would invest in such a thing.

Exactly. You don't even have your starting investment capital back, not accounting for inflation. In other words, if you invested 15K in everything (dating, ring, home down payment) in 1980 dollars, you don't even get that 15K back in year 2020 dollars if you divorce 40 years later.

You forget you joined the retired plan for two.

Originally Posted by TigPlaze

Yet, not once have I ever known a woman to have the revelation, "Hey wait a minute! We're scaring the rich men away!"

That's because rich men haven't stopped marrying women, if anything they are more inclined to do so. The more wealth you have the less aware are about what could go wrong or what is going wrong. Financial success has a way of making a dunce out of people.

Originally Posted by Hedon

That's because rich men haven't stopped marrying women, if anything they are more inclined to do so. The more wealth you have the more unaware you'd be about what could go wrong or what is going wrong. Financial success has a way of making a dunce out of people.

I agree. They are financially smart but remain ignorant of the divorce rape that's inflicted on men.

Could be because these rich guys were treated as nerds in school and so were ignored by girls in favor of the jocks. So, now that these nerds are wealthy, they feel that are finally getting what they deserve: female attention.

Unfortunately, they fail to realize that this 'female attention' that they are suddenly getting is just a gold-digging tactic.
If I were them and I have a need for female companionship, I'd fly to Asia or someplace, hire an escort, spend a few days with her, then show her the door and then fly back. Rinse and repeat. No need to get married and subject oneself to the torture and scam that is marriage.

If the rich guys have a need to sire a heir, there are services that provide a "womb for rent", ie a surrogate. IIRC, that Portugese soccer player ( Ronaldo?) did just that. There's some rumor that his twin babies were conceived in a laboratory and born to a surrogate mother.

I see it more as a class thing than wealth itself. Some working class/blue collar men get paid quite a lot and can accumulate a lot of wealth. They tend to be of course from working class suburbia and have more traditional values and tend to be less educated in terms of University etc. These Tradies marry very attractive women who usually have corporate jobs as secretaries and personal assistants etc.

Although these guys make a lot of money and are skilled at what they do they tend to be kind of dopey and Blue Pill. They get suckered in by the whole thing and don't understand that the women they married are seeing a very different type of man at work.

Meanwhile the White Collar guys have been through College/University, they are probably Lefties in one way or another, they have seen women whore themselves out to get through studies. If they marry at all it will be a woman who is a lot more traditional and probably doesn't want to work at all, nor would she need to due to his pay packet.

Leonardo deCaprio espouses politically correct viewpoints in exchange for license to flout "the rules."

For example, he can take a private jet to a climate crisis conference to lend his star power to "the cause."

When it comes to women, he rotates a series of 20-something actresses or models through his bed every 3 years.

When it comes to women, he has learned that if you return the library book to the library on time, the library will always give you a new book.

Marriage is for suckers. I really can't believe some men still do it. My nephew for example, no one likes his fiancé. On top of that, she is lazy, doesn't want to work just wants to get up late and do nothing meanwhile my nephew is slaving away 6 days a week. They've had so many problems so far and their marriage has just been indefinitely cancelled. I thought that's good he has woken up but i got told he still loves and wants her. No idea what the actual issue is though. I've tried to tell him a few things but he thinks he knows everything so no go there. This woman will destroy his life!

I’m probably considered a somewhat wealthy person for my age range…was in two relationships…engaged in both but I pretty much knew I couldn’t go through with it. I just couldn’t stomach the thought of some girl with a $0 or negative net worth getting a big chunk of what I saved up, invested and did without to acquire. They were already enjoying themselves way too much with my income without contributing much of anything. Just too much of a risk for me.

For a person more on the wealthy end and under 40 — they could try finding a woman that’s wealthy also, but that probably limits them to 1-2% of women that aren’t just trust fund kids.

Originally Posted by sam luis obispo

when it comes to women, he has learned that if you return the library book to the library on time, the library will always give you a new book.

ha ha ha

Originally Posted by Chris007

ha ha ha

Leo will never lose half his fortune in a divorce.
He will never have his life interfered with.

He just spouts the politically correct orthodoxy and the woke mob will ignore that he is not on the plantation.

The fact that he is single allows potential paramours to come to him with the illusion that they will be 'special' enough to "tame the maverick" and convince him to marry them.

Leo is smarter than this. He sells the 'sizzle,' and never gives up the 'steak.'

Originally Posted by sam luis obispo

Leo will never lose half his fortune in a divorce.
He will never have his life interfered with.

He just spouts the politically correct orthodoxy and the woke mob will ignore that he is not on the plantation.

The fact that he is single allows potential paramours to come to him with the illusion that they will be 'special' enough to "tame the maverick" and convince him to marry them.

Leo is smarter than this. He sells the 'sizzle,' and never gives up the 'steak.'

He’s got to notice all the celebs going through divorces too. Why invite that kind of drama when he can just have all the women until they bore him — then get a new one. He’s probably at an age where he’s accepted he doesn’t want kids so no point in doing the family thing.

I mean, a parasite wants to find the best host possible, it do you think it cares about the host?

They want the most amount of resources for the least amount of effort. In the modern age they are running their parasitism like a business.

The only way to win is to not buy.

Originally Posted by Edwardhaskell

He’s got to notice all the celebs going through divorces too. Why invite that kind of drama when he can just have all the women until they bore him — then get a new one. He’s probably at an age where he’s accepted he doesn’t want kids so no point in doing the family thing.

The question is: How does he keep from getting sperm jacked?

Has he gotten a vasectomy he does not tell the starlets about?

It's not a matter of logic, but of entitlement. They think men exist to work for money for them. How women act isn't supposed to factor into it, because however they act is an expression of what they as woman "need." It isn't fair for them to face consequences for what they need. So men simply need to return to "being men," which means providing for women no matter what.

I would like to see DeSantis in Florida make prenuptial agreements in marriage a legal requirement for marriage in Florida. He'd do it too. They have the legislature that would back him if he did.