Have you guys noticed whether or not any women have had the revelation expressed in my title? It's ironic that women demand to be with a wealthy man, but then they encourage a system where the wealthier a man is, the worse idea marriage is. The bigger your pile of wealth, the more that can come crashing down via divorce. A poor man does risk his emotional well-being if he marries, but women don't marry poor men. Feminists have fought to release women from their gender roles while holding men to ours. A man is even more expected to provide wealth than he was in the past.
Men don't even have to come to our MGTOW forum, or some other one, to figure out that marriage is a rotten deal. And it gets worse the wealthier you become! You could work for decades to build a great career as a detective, and be a year away from a good pension, only to have half of it robbed away from you via divorce. You could build up a big pile of wealth to be set on as an attorney, only to have a woman rob half of it plus alimony plus outrageously high child support. Then suddenly you're left with far less than you started out with as a first-year associate.
They want to marry the rich men, but then they do everything in their power to make marriage a terrible deal for rich men. They could marry a poor man, but then they might be the ones who end up owing them money.
Yet, not once have I ever known a woman to have the revelation, "Hey wait a minute! We're scaring the rich men away!"
Not that I care. I've long been disgusted by how transactional women's love is. I don't even consider it to be love if it's conditioned on money. Hence, the MGTOW refrain "Women are incapable of loving men" to be totally true.