Thread: Hell Hath No Fury Like A Woman Scorned! Genius Taken Down!

"Fifty-four-year-old David Sabatini, a world-famous molecular biologist specializing in how cancer tumors develop.
Four years ago Sabatini was a tenured professor at MIT. For twenty years he'd been running a big lab at the nearby Whitehead Institute for biomedical research, supervising a team of 39 researchers.

Sabatini is a real Expert—a genius, according to colleagues. He made a key discovery in cancer research while he was still at medical school. Back in 2018 he was a good bet for a Nobel Prize.

So what's the latest news on David Sabatini? I'll let Suzy Weiss, writing on her sister Bari Weiss’ Substack site, tell you:

Today, Sabatini is unemployed and unemployable. No one wants to be associated with him. Those who do risk losing their jobs, publishing opportunities, friends, visas, and huge federal grants.

What precipitated such a downfall? The key here is in those lines penned by William Congreve three and a quarter centuries ago: Heav'n has no rage like love to hatred turn'd,Nor Hell a fury, like a woman scorn'd..


In April of 2018, Sabatini, separated from his wife and in divorce proceedings, started an affair with Kristin Knouse, below, a researcher at the Whitehead who was twenty years his junior—thirty to his fifty.

The affair chugged along for two years, although you get the impression from Suzy Weiss's account—and she spoke to everyone that was willing to meet her—that Sabatini was losing interest.

You can guess the rest. Knouse told the director of the Whitehead Institute, a woman named Ruth Lehmann, that Sabatini had harassed and abused her. Ms. Lehmann [Email her] hired in a big law firm to do an investigation. They did one, and in August last year delivered their findings in a 250-page report.

What did the report say? It said Sabatini had failed to disclose his consensual relationship with Knouse as per company policy. Also that "his behavior created a sexualized undercurrent in the lab.” Also that, notwithstanding the fact Sabatini didn't work with Knouse or supervise her and had no power to fire her, he had undue "influence" over her.

Those of Sabatini's colleagues willing to speak to Suzy Weiss said the report was all hogwash, although one went further and called it "deeply insane."

There is of course a money angle here. Labs like the Whitehead and research institutes like those at MIT live off multi-million-dollar grants from the National Institutes of Health (a federal government outfit) and big corporations and foundations, all of them locked in to Regime Ideology and terrified of the Thought Police . . . "

Full article: https://vdare.com/articles/john-derb...o_paragraph=24

You'd think a guy that smart would know better. That's what happens when you think with the wrong head. Cest La Vie.

Of course, the chinese or other red-pilled nations will snap him up.....quietly. MIT's loss.

Originally Posted by Gunnar

You'd think a guy that smart would know better.

They're usually the most clueless about women.

Dude was probably a virgin until he was 28. Not saying his mistake is okay, but I can understand.

It's gonna be fun watching the MIT crowds scamper for food after the induced economic implosion.

If you were to tally up all dollars from the national debt, place them end to end in a straight line, you would need a speedometer that reads in lightyears to bridge the span, and it's growing @ 280,000 miles a second! It's a mathematical impossibility to pay it down, the same mathematical impossibility as traveling past the speed of light! Good thing most dollars are digital, we'd need a pearl necklace of planets to deforest and make the paper, leave alone the ink!

It's seams the real smart people are sometimes idiots that can't see a thing!

Originally Posted by CPRA

"Fifty-four-year-old David Sabatini, a world-famous molecular biologist specializing in how cancer tumors develop.

Status, one of the male traits women find very sexually attractive. Likely the the trait that caries the most weight.

David ditches the wife, takes on a GF that figures out she will only be a GF and never a wife.... GF then decides if she can't have him no one will and destroys his reputation. I wonder how much effort GF put into splitting up David and his now ex-wife?

It doesn't matter about humanity, it doesn't matter that David was doing research into cancer, a leading cause of death in the western world that might have lead to saving lives. It only mattered to a couple of women, Kristin Knouse and Ruth Lehmann that if they can't have the prize, no one will!!!

F#*K short sighted people!!!

Maybe he'll be on here soon...

Y'know, the deeper I think about this man's case, the more I think this is also how women steal a man's life's work.

The dude is Nobel material, probably has published dozens of research papers and done plenty of scientific experiments. Now that he has accomplished many of his goals and has toiled hard for all that cancer research, women want to take credit for it.

But how?

Simple: Nominate one of their own to seduce the guy, then accuse him of sexual harassment. Then have him fired or made unemployable. Then take over whatever research he has done and leave his name out of the scientific publications. Make it look like women did it all by themselves. He probably can't do anything because universities probably have some legal clause that all his work belongs to the university and they can give credit to whomever they want.

Cunts.

If countries like Japan, China and S.Korea were smart enough, they'd snap this guy up, give him suitable funding and create the cure for cancer for themselves.

Originally Posted by CPRA

What did the report say? It said Sabatini had failed to disclose his consensual relationship with Knouse as per company policy. Also that "his behavior created a sexualized undercurrent in the lab.”

I HATE this attitude from employers. Many think they have some sort of right to exert control over our private lives.

They pay us to do our jobs and within that framework they have the right to tell us what to do and how to do it. Sometimes this can seem overbearing and you want to push back, but you should remember that they’re paying you for this privilege.

More and more though bosses seem to think they have the right to determine our personal lives as well. This is especially apparent with multinationals and government posts with their “Work – Life Balance” courses, they seek to control every aspect of your life.

I’ve also seen it with small employers though. “Don’t go womanising or drinking at the weekends – it reflects badly on the business.”

Fuck ‘em. My professional life is my professional life, my personal life is my concern and never the twain shall meet.

A message to employers:

Do I turn up for my shifts? Do I execute the tasks you pay me for?

If you can answer yes to these two questions then keep your ugly fucking nose out of things that don’t concern you!

Originally Posted by Jackoff

[...] I’ve also seen it with small employers though. “Don’t go womanising or drinking at the weekends – it reflects badly on the business.” [...]

I've seen it as well. Much of it is a reaction to anything and everything going up on social media now that we have 24x7 connected smartphones. Make a mistake and it's on FB within 5 minutes. Even if it's something honorable, it's going to piss off a large part of the population for certain. (Unless it's the "correct side" that commits the transgression, and then everyone asks what's the big deal, or calls it disinformation.) So now everyone has to live his life looking over his shoulder every waking moment for some busybody malcontent just waiting to spring out from under a rock.

There are scientific departments in certain institutions where the entire team is male. Obviously, there are not many of these. In order to avoid being targeted as discriminatory, they have to be small and undesirable to women (long hours, no recognition, remotely located etc). I have worked in one of these places, and it was glorious. The place had had a woman or two working there in previous decades, and it had been such a shit show of unnecessary drama that they had quietly decided among themselves that they would NEVER hire another one into their ranks. Many years had passed since the last woman had worked there, but the memory of it, and the decision it had inspired lived on.

Like a military platoon, the participants just sort of fell together into a team to address issues and challenges that came up for their department. The single guys covered the family holidays like Thanksgiving and Christmas. Married guys with kids covered New Years Eve and July 4 (to give the single guys a chance to play on those days). There had never been a discussion or argument over this. It wasn't necessary. It was so obvious and logical to arrange the schedule that way that it just happened.

There were lots of things that got handled that way. But none of those solutions could have worked had there been the presence of any woman in the equation who would have had to agree. The reason for that is that at some point in their lives, all women have been given the message that they are somehow extra special and valuable. No one ever really explains to them why that would be so, or how to measure that extra value. They are left to figure that out by themselves. So, they never stop nudging, pushing or otherwise attempting to manipulate their environments to deliver to them the extra reward that they have been convinced that they deserve. They become tyrannical if they are never told 'no', and they lose face and become embarrassed, vindictive and emotionally unstable when they are refused that special treatment.

How tyrannical can they become if never told 'no'? If they make demands for increased reward and are told 'yes', they can assume that perhaps they didn't demand enough, and so the demand rises. It will continue to rise until eventually, the demand cannot be met, and then the hostilities begin. Don't believe it? Brad Pitt = sexiest man alive. Eventually, he could not meet the demand. He got divorce raped and thrown away. Jeff Bezos = Richest man alive. Eventually, he could not meet the demand and got divorce raped and thrown back. Robin Williams = funniest man in a generation. You know the rest of that story... So, if you are reading this and still thinking that you can have a stable relationship with a woman, ask yourself how you are going to be sexier than Brad Pitt, richer that Jeff Bezos, and funnier than Robin Williams...???

To try to have a sexual relationship with a woman, while being a coworker with her, while having a woman for a boss... is the result of ignoring this reality. An example of how irrational they can be: Women are a group that openly demands for all women to make the same money as all men, while quietly and simultaneously demanding that the men they marry make more than they do. Never mind that this is mathematically impossible. Why would you want to provide professionally devastating ammunition to someone as irrational as this, whose environment, culture and society have put into perfect position to use against you?

No matter who you are, if you get into a relationship with a woman, sooner or later, you will have to say 'no' to a demand for special treatment or extra reward that you cannot meet. For this scientist, the relationship with the girlfriend ended, and she sought to destroy him, because at some point, she wanted something from the relationship, and the answer was 'no'.

I feel sad for yet another guy who had yet another bright career destroyed. I feel worse for the future cancer patients who will not have the benefit of the scientific advances he might have made on their behalf. But I am no more surprised by the result than I was at the end of that YouTube video where some idiot soldiers handed a loaded AK-47 to a monkey, and then moments later had to dive for cover...

'Totally predictable.

Originally Posted by FreeGhost

Of course, the chinese or other red-pilled nations will snap him up.....quietly. MIT's loss.

That's what I'd do if I were him. I'd defect and do as much damage as I could possibly do. I can't understand why more men aren't taking this approach. Western men were sold out by CommieGloboCorp, SocialistGynoState and AntiMaleFakeNewsMSM long ago.

I'm in total agreement with what Jackoff wrote! If an employer try's to tell me what to do on my personal time fuck off and kiss my ass all up in the crack!

Originally Posted by FreeGhost

Of course, the chinese or other red-pilled nations will snap him up.....quietly. MIT's loss.

Good point. Most of South America would probably snap him up too. It sounds like outside of the West, he could still write his own ticket.

This guy would be safe in Russia. Remember reading about a sexual harassment case there where a boss was accused of it by a female secretary. The Russian judge listened carefully, noting that the man had massaged her back at work and touched her boobs, then made his judgement. Russia needs more baby Russians, case dismissed. Lol

Originally Posted by Jackoff

I HATE this attitude from employers. Many think they have some sort of right to exert control over our private lives.

My guess is that employers do not want to hire alliances. Or see alliances form that might compete against their interests, such as a romantic couple where one steers work opportunity towards the other, unfair to coworkers and policy. Employers want it like playing blackjack, everyone against the dealer.