Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 38
  1. #1

    Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    This might be old news to a lot of you, but I came across the Wikipedia definition of MGTOW today. I was surprised.


    Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW /ˈmɪɡtaʊ/) is an anti-feminist, misogynistic, mostly online community advocating for men to separate themselves from women and from a society which they believe has been corrupted by feminism. The community is a part of the manosphere, a collection of anti-feminist websites and online communities that also includes the men's rights movement, incels, and pickup artists.
    Like other manosphere communities, MGTOW overlaps with the alt-right and white supremacist movements, and it has been implicated in online harassment of women. The Southern Poverty Law Center categorizes MGTOW as a part of the male supremacist ideology.
    It isn't that complicated my guy. The whole ideology is in the name.

    I am a pretty na´ve person and I have no idea why someone would want to misrepresent MGTOW to such a malicious degree, it is nuts how twisted this explanation is and how it even made it past the Wikipedia moderators. If someone can shed light as to how a group of people can be so vindictive, feel free to enlighten me.

  2. #2
    Senior Member mgtower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    4,193
    Reputation
    12394
    Type
    Ghosted by law and order.

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Roxigo View Post
    This might be old news to a lot of you, but I came across the Wikipedia definition of MGTOW today. I was surprised.




    It isn't that complicated my guy. The whole ideology is in the name.

    I am a pretty na´ve person and I have no idea why someone would want to misrepresent MGTOW to such a malicious degree, it is nuts how twisted this explanation is and how it even made it past the Wikipedia moderators. If someone can shed light as to how a group of people can be so vindictive, feel free to enlighten me.
    Entitlement denied creates animosity and resentment, we threw princess's pedestal in a swamp and broke her magic wand.



  3. #3

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Check out the older, archived entry for MGTOW (Dec 2015): Men Going Their Own Way - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (archive.org)

    Its much better version than the butchered and twisted piece it is now.

  4. #4

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Roxigo View Post
    This might be old news to a lot of you, but I came across the Wikipedia definition of MGTOW today. I was surprised.

    It isn't that complicated my guy. The whole ideology is in the name.

    I am a pretty na´ve person and I have no idea why someone would want to misrepresent MGTOW to such a malicious degree, it is nuts how twisted this explanation is and how it even made it past the Wikipedia moderators. If someone can shed light as to how a group of people can be so vindictive, feel free to enlighten me.
    The MGTOW article in Wikipedia is what made me quit donating money to and donating my time to support Wikipedia. I used to write Wikipedia articles on technical topics. I've QUIT! I kept fixing the MGTOW article, and the assholes kept changing it back and they yelled at me for "vandalizing" the article. I correctly pointed out that calling MGTOW misogyny is an unsupported OPINION, and that an encyclopedia has an obligation to be objective. It didn't work. Supposedly the Southern Poverty Law Center's opinion that it's misogyny somehow proves it to be a fact for an objective article.

    It's absurd. MGTOW is simply men exercising their right to opt out of dating and marriage. That's it. When you get down to the very basics, there's no way anyone can prove it's misogyny.

    I regret that I ever gave Wikipedia any money. I will never do that again. I was hoping that Microsoft would bring back Encarta, but the woketrash scumbags would probably warp that one too to promote their dogma.

    When supposedly objective sources promote feminist dogma, we know we've gone way, way too far into feminist control.

  5. #5
    Senior Member mgtower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    4,193
    Reputation
    12394
    Type
    Ghosted by law and order.

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by TigPlaze View Post
    The MGTOW article in Wikipedia is what made me quit donating money to and donating my time to support Wikipedia. I used to write Wikipedia articles on technical topics. I've QUIT! I kept fixing the MGTOW article, and the assholes kept changing it back and they yelled at me for "vandalizing" the article. I correctly pointed out that calling MGTOW misogyny is an unsupported OPINION, and that an encyclopedia has an obligation to be objective. It didn't work. Supposedly the Southern Poverty Law Center's opinion that it's misogyny somehow proves it to be a fact for an objective article.

    It's absurd. MGTOW is simply men exercising their right to opt out of dating and marriage. That's it. When you get down to the very basics, there's no way anyone can prove it's misogyny.

    I regret that I ever gave Wikipedia any money. I will never do that again. I was hoping that Microsoft would bring back Encarta, but the woketrash scumbags would probably warp that one too to promote their dogma.

    When supposedly objective sources promote feminist dogma, we know we've gone way, way too far into feminist control.
    SPLC are lawyers, and when laws are inhumane, lawyers are inhumane and courts their slaughterhouses.

    The reality is we're living under inhumane law watched over by reprobates and ruled over by unjust minded and character flawed individuals.

    According Wikipedia under "feminism", misandry is mentioned only once and as an internal opinion among some feminists and not the definition thereof.

    We're here mostly because,,, the war on men, only a fool would think it'll stop, but we know we won the gender war by leaving the battlefield and now we see the desperation of those that lost and still continue to fight an enemy that vanished.

    We're costing them their livelihoods as thieves, bloodsuckers, and propagandists. We're costing them millions and millions of dollars a month. You can bet they're out to extinguish us as we are a threat to their dishonest embedded ways spawned in resentment, jealousy, and hatred.

    Men undevoted to women destroys their fragile house of cards. They're doing everything external to stop it, while internally their personas are doing everything to promote it.

    Let them work feverishly on their failures and bring them to fruition. I'm too damn busy enjoying my psychological success to bother hating anything or put effort into destroying it.

    It's not our fault MGTOW has toxic side effects on the misandrists and empties the dating pool of men leaving women exposed to their own mutual undoing.

    Urban dictionary suffers the same fate, therefore let them lie to truth all they want, nothing will change the circumstances, it only hardens our resolve.

  6. #6

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by mgtower View Post
    SPLC are lawyers, and when laws are inhumane, lawyers are inhumane and courts their slaughterhouses.

    The reality is we're living under inhumane law watched over by reprobates and ruled over by unjust minded and character flawed individuals.

    According Wikipedia under "feminism", misandry is mentioned only once and as an internal opinion among some feminists and not the definition thereof.

    We're here mostly because,,, the war on men, only a fool would think it'll stop, but we know we won the gender war by leaving the battlefield and now we see the desperation of those that lost and still continue to fight an enemy that vanished.

    We're costing them their livelihoods as thieves, bloodsuckers, and propagandists. We're costing them millions and millions of dollars a month. You can bet they're out to extinguish us as we are a threat to their dishonest embedded ways spawned in resentment, jealousy, and hatred.

    Men undevoted to women destroys their fragile house of cards. They're doing everything external to stop it, while internally their personas are doing everything to promote it.

    Let them work feverishly on their failures and bring them to fruition. I'm too damn busy enjoying my psychological success to bother hating anything or put effort into destroying it.

    It's not our fault MGTOW has toxic side effects on the misandrists and empties the dating pool of men leaving women exposed to their own mutual undoing.

    Urban dictionary suffers the same fate, therefore let them lie to truth all they want, nothing will change the circumstances, it only hardens our resolve.
    Outstanding post. I would add that whenever the feminists make the claim that MGTOW is about hate, it's all pure projection. The straw man they create of us is actually a very accurate reflection of themselves. The AgainstHateSubreddits is a perfect example. They live in a fantasy that they're these enlightened people and are the next positive step in the evolution of humankind. In reality, they're a bunch of anti-free-speech bullies.

    MGTOW is actually about helping men who have suffered. Millions of men believed the romantic fantasy that we so often see in romcoms and elsewhere that you'll be able to find a woman who is totally loyal to you and who loves you for the human being that you are, and who would be with you regardless of economics -- she would love you and fight with you even if you lost every penny. Then it's a soul-crushing disillusionment to learn just how disloyal most women are, and that the woman you had on blinders for and thought was special was actually a ruthless, cold, and calculating person. We help men who have been brutally destroyed by marriage. Marriage rapes men's souls. Marriage, which we were brought up to believe was the ultimate fulfillment of love, is used by women to destroy men. A man's entire financial and emotional well-being can be destroyed by marriage. And it is. This is what happens to men over and over thanks to our evil system. We help men to recover from that wasteland, that war zone that is left in marriage's wake. Our goal is to help men to recover from that and to find a way to have a good life anyway. AgainstHateSubreddits thinks the thing to do to men who've suffered like that is to kick him when he's down. They think that kicking with steel-toe boots a man who's already in serious pain is a swell and enlightened thing to do.

    When a man comes home from his deployment in Iraq, already scarred emotionally from the horror if having seen his buddies blown up, and returns hoping to find the comforting arms of his wife, only to discover she's divorcing him and his been stabbing him in the back the whole time by fucking another man, we think that man has a right to be angry. We think he has the right to express his pain. AHS thinks they're heroes for kicking him when he's down. We know that a man who's suffered like that might very well use colorful language. He might call his cheating and manipulative ex a "cunt." We think she deserves to be called that. We think someone who pisses all over sacred wedding vows deserves our contempt. AHS thinks any use of the word "cunt" makes someone a misogynist. They grossly misuse that word. It means "hatred of women." If our soldier is angry at his wife for cheating on him during his deployment, we think his anger is justified. We think adultery is a crime against one's spouse. When she cheats against her deployed soldier husband, she's betraying both her husband and her country. AHS thinks she was doing nothing wrong. They agree with feminists that marriage is all about the woman gaining advantage from the man, and that if she ever loses that tingling feeling that she got addicted to at first, then she has no obligation to honor the vows she took. She took vows like "to love and honor" .... "in good times and in bad times, in sickness and in health" ... and to "forsake all others" (in other words to not fuck anyone else. We think wedding vows only have value if they are honored, if they are held sacred. AHS thinks they're just the pretty words you say on that one day, and that if a woman feels like bailing, she should be encouraged, and she has the right to profit off of stealing assets from her husband that she has not earned. AHS thinks a man destroyed via divorce should simply "man up," as we're so often told, as if recovering from financial and emotional devastation were something any man could accomplish quickly and easily simply by developing an "I'm tough" attitude and just instantly willing himself to recover. We think men destroyed via divorce deserve our compassion. They think men like that deserved to be kicked hard when they're already down and are already crying in pain and are already considering suicide. Then when they've kicked someone like that, they pat themselves on the back as "heroes". We think suffering men deserve our compassion.

    We think when men find MGTOW, they find liberation. We think it's beautiful when a man opts out and starts rebuilding a life, a wonderful life in which he's free. We think it's great when a man escapes from the meat grinder that is marriage and chooses to build himself up, enjoying all his hobbies and rebuilding his health and wealth. AHS thinks men like that are evil misogynists who deserve to be kicked hard. AHS loves it when men suffer. They're for that. They're limited brains can't conceive of anything else. That's why when a concept like MGTOW comes along, they have no ability to understand it. They're knee-jerk reaction is "misogyny." It couldn't be that men have been through complex situations where they've suffered. If a man calls a woman a "cunt," then he must be a one-dimensional evil villain. AHS has erected this absurd scarecrow of MGTOW, and they're so fanatical to maintain their distortion of the truth that they've hijacked Wikipedia. If it turned out that MGTOW were actually men recovering from suffering at the hands of women, then their entire world view would be in jeopardy. They couldn't claim that we're oppressing women via some made-up thing known as the "patriarchy." The reality is that women have much, much more power than men, especially in our court system. Our court system is set up to ruthlessly destroy men. It's set up to allow women to steal from men and to emotionally cripple men via gatekeeping their access to their children.

    MGTOW men have decided that want no part of that unjust system. Some of us have escaped marriages. Others of us have been fortunate enough to avoid ever having to be married. Either way, we MGTOW men know that our brothers need us. We know that even just a place to talk about what we've been through can promote our healing. AHS is against our emotional healing. They think we should just shut up, as we have no right to talk about the rotten system that has abused us. They feel so strongly that we should just shut up that they lobbied Reddit successfully to get our subs there shut down. One of the subs (MGTOW2) had even banned the posting of any memes that could be seen as woman bashing, and only allowed posts about rebuilding lives. That didn't matter. AHS is determined to believe their straw man of MGTOW, against all evidence. They think they're heroes for shutting up the voices of suffering and the voices of life rebuilding. They're not heroes. They're just a bunch of whiny adult-children who put on steel-toe boots and found people who had expressed pain, and had used colorful language in that pain, and they thought kicking them when down was a heroic thing to do.

    AHS has failed.

    They may have got us kicked off Reddit, but they have not shut us up. All of our MGTOW brothers are free to discuss what we've been through and how we're building up amazing lives, despite the horror we've been through. AHS is all for empowering women. They empower the wife of a soldier when that wife betrays her husband and her country by cheating on him. She just couldn't endure his 36 months of deployment without having a dick in her cunt, so she just had to cheat. AHS sees that as an empowered woman simply fulfilling her needs. We see her as the adulteress and traitor that she is. She's a traitor to her husband. She's a traitor to her country. If we had any justice in this country, she would go to the hard-labor prison as she deserves to serve her own 36-month sentence. Then when she's released, she will be penniless, as her adultery would have exempted any claims on any assets from her marriage. Her adultery would be regarded as a sex offense, and she would therefore have to register as a sex offender.

    That's how things would work if we had justice in the United States. But we don't. That's why men must steer clear of marriage and dating. It's a rotten system designed to chew up men and spit them out. We're here to help men to recover from that. AHS is waiting in the wing to kick us and then claim they're heroic.

  7. #7
    Junior Member SaranSDS008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    21
    Reputation
    32
    Type
    Ghost

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    And they Locked the Thread as well, so that Nobody apart from Accounts "Verified" by Wikipedia (Well basically, it means that you must have edited atleast many (I think upto 20, not sure tbh) Articles and Wikipedia should have Approved that) can edit that :/ . Also, It's Not the Wikipedia's Fault either (They are just a Non-Profit Org. run barely on Donations, who rely on mass to Add articles. It's the "Editors" aka Vandals (In our case, it's the Feminists/Misandrists/Communist BLM Antifa Lefty cunts). Well, They did this not only to MGTOW, but to every articles exist there (Yep, they long ago replaced True Knowledge with their Delusion and Propaganda). I barely even use Wikipedia nowadays. Time to Move on i guess.....



    Yep, You saw that right. This stuff is way better compared to Wikipedia. While Wiki Rely on "Editors" aka Vandals, Encarta relies on actual Professionals (Ppl who had shit ton of Experience in their field and don't blaspheme like what these Delusionals out there aka the Left do) (Yep, for Physics articles, Professors of Physics. For Geography/Geology/whateveritis articles, Geologists or Professor of Geology, etc)
    Proof/Eg.: In case of this Article on the Newton's Three laws of Motion under Classical Mechanics, this article was written by a Professor of Physics (And cannot be altered), and not by a random hobo/whore who doesn't tell you whether he/she qualified high school or not (And can be freely vandalized or Edited by Anyone (Yep, it actually happened guys. Fans of a famous YTuber and Minecraft Speedrunner called Dream actually Vandalized Wikipedia's Articles for clout). Also, there might be Propaganda stuff here and there in this Software, blame Mass Media for that. but for most part, looks Far better and way reliable compared to Wikipedia.


    The Only Con of this Awesome Software is: It's Dead. Yes, MikeRo$oft killed this and the Online version of this back in 2009-2010. Blame them for that (And that's an Advantage as well to an extent, cuz MikeRo$oft Nowadays is Hardcore Left, and thank god, those shit never made it's way into this awesome software. There might be few. but for most parts, not much compared to wiki).

    But if anyone really need this software (This version is the latest, 2009. But there are many older version before this (Starting all the way from 1995). Anyone could DM Me if they ever wanted those old versions), Here ya' go:
    https://archive.org/details/microsof...-premium-2009/

    https://getintopc.com/softwares/educ...nload-1732714/ (I downloaded it from here)

    System Requirements (As Always) for this Version (For older Versions, it may be different):
    OS: Windows XP and Above (Sorry, Mac Users, There is Nothing here for y'all. Please get Bootcamp for god's sake)
    Memory: 512 MB and above (Please don't for god's sake run this on ur 286 PC with 50 MB memory)
    HDD Space: 3-4 GB Required
    Note: Adobe Flash is Required as a Prerequisite to run this software. If anyone wanna get Flash Player, here ya' go: https://github.com/CleanFlash/installer (Link Got Taken down due to that EVIL DMCA it seems)
    Archive Link: https://web.archive.org/web/20210725...lash/installer
    Archive Download for Latest Release: https://web.archive.org/web/20210725..._Installer.exe
    (In case if anyone uses Windows 8.1 or 10 and Enabled Auto-Updates in case of windows 8.1, Please Uninstall Update KB4577586 and then Install this (And try to Disable Auto-Updates as far as possible in windows 10, cuz M$ re-installs the update again it seems)).
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by SaranSDS008; October 7, 2021 at 10:44 AM.
    SaranSDS008

  8. #8

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    I think Wikipedia also drove World Book Encyclopedia and Encyclopedia Britannica into the dirt. I wish they would resurrect themselves as online services. It would be worth paying for a real encyclopedia to not be stuck with Wikipedia trash. Wikipedia was a great idea, and it worked at first. It still works for non-controversial articles such as an article about a piece of technology or a place. But as soon as any article is the least bit controversial, they grossly and absurdly slant it in favor of feminism. It's appalling that a hate/terrorist movement like feminism has so much power.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    1,011
    Reputation
    5945
    Type
    Ghost

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Seems like the Wikipedia editing model follows Satan's playbook: steal, kill, and destroy. Eventually they'll marginalize themselves so severely that they'll self-relegate to Playpen For The Deranged And Low Attention Spanners. See, the problem with that side is this: It always takes things too far and, sooner or later, turns everything it gets its mitts on into rubbish.

    Apart from that, anything whose name starts with "Wiki" ought to raise a red flag in every rational person's mind.

  10. #10
    Senior Member mgtower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    4,193
    Reputation
    12394
    Type
    Ghosted by law and order.

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Wow, speak of the devil, I just got an email from Wikipedia looking for donations, I gave 3 bucks a couple years ago, prompted by some really valuable information they had and I needed, and now they're tapping my shoulder for some more.

    I'm giving them one of my feminist hand gestures with a full load!

    Dear Tower,

    My name is Jimmy Wales, and I’m the founder of Wikipedia. Two years ago, you donated $3 to keep Wikipedia online for yourself and millions of people around the world. Each year, fewer than 2% of Wikipedia readers choose to support our work. You have been one of those rare donors, and for this I want to thank you warmly. I’m grateful you decided to invest in the future of free knowledge with your generous gift. Every single donation -- no matter how small -- means so much. That’s why I’m here today, personally asking you to renew the help you’ve given us in the past. The world needs a place where knowledge is free, ad-free, and impartial.

    Will you renew your solidarity with a $3 donation?

    This is awkward to admit, but I have to be honest: 98% of our readers don’t give; they simply look the other way when we ask for an annual donation. We choose not to charge a subscription fee, but that doesn’t mean we don’t need support from our readers. We don’t send a fundraising email every month. We respectfully ask for just one donation this year so that Wikipedia may continue to move forward and offer knowledge to the world.

    If all our past donors gave a small amount today, our fundraiser would be over. Unfortunately, most people will ignore this message. We have no choice but to turn to you: please renew your gift to ensure that Wikipedia remains independent, ad-free, and thriving for years to come.

    We’re a non-profit. That means we aren’t selling the articles that millions of people read on Wikipedia each day. We don’t profit from the knowledge you seek. In fact, we firmly believe that knowledge should exist outside of the realm of supply and demand. That's hardly a given nowadays; so much of the world's digital knowledge is driven by profit.

    Wikipedia is different in that it doesn't belong to the highest bidder, the advertisers, or corporations. It belongs to you, the readers, editors, and donors. You’re our community, our family. You’re the reason we exist. The fate of Wikipedia rests in your hands and we wouldn’t have it any other way.

    It’s readers like you who safeguard our non-profit mission. You help us maintain our integrity, quality, and accessibility. Today, please consider giving again, or even increasing your gift, to keep Wikipedia free and independent.

    Now is the time we ask: can we count on you to renew your solidarity with another crucial donation? If everyone reading this gives just a few dollars more than last time, Wikipedia will stay online, ad-free, and growing for years to come.

    https://donate.wikimedia.org

    Thanks,
    Jimmy Wales
    Founder of Wikipedia

  11. #11
    Junior Member SaranSDS008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    21
    Reputation
    32
    Type
    Ghost

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by TigPlaze View Post
    I think Wikipedia also drove World Book Encyclopedia and Encyclopedia Britannica into the dirt. I wish they would resurrect themselves as online services. It would be worth paying for a real encyclopedia to not be stuck with Wikipedia trash. Wikipedia was a great idea, and it worked at first. It still works for non-controversial articles such as an article about a piece of technology or a place. But as soon as any article is the least bit controversial, they grossly and absurdly slant it in favor of feminism. It's appalling that a hate/terrorist movement like feminism has so much power.
    LOL they even ruined the so-called Non-Controversy ones with Propaganda and one sided Bias Delusions. And if anyone opposes those, They would destroy them using "Fact Checks" and would call them as "Bigot Racist Misogynists blah blah". That's why Nowadays, Wiki and many modern Encyclopedias are trash, cuz they are NOT Written by professionals, but rather these delusionals who claim themselves as "Knowledge" "Providers", who never even qualified high school in the first place. Getting Older Encyclopedias written by professionals would be the only way to get out this fuckery i guess.
    SaranSDS008

  12. #12
    Junior Member SaranSDS008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    21
    Reputation
    32
    Type
    Ghost

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Damn, this Article Explains with Proof on How Wiki is Biased towards Left (Yep, progressive and Communist) using few Studies made by Universities: https://www.allsides.com/blog/wikipedia-biased. Heck, even Wikipedia's Co-Founder made his own research on it and confirms that's it's so badly biased: https://larrysanger.org/2020/05/wiki...-badly-biased/. So, Please Stop using Wikipedia if anyone still uses it to look for reliable info (You won't get one there lol). I would recommend switching to Britannica or Encarta or any other good encyclopedia out there for reliable info. These are only looking tainted/biased only on political side (Or in few academic side like that delusion called "Global" "Warming", "Animal""Conservation" or "Climate""Change". Just ignore these assholes lol. These Environmental Vegan Bitches who probably must be from some insane asylum, are spreading delusions which contradicts science. just pretend they don't exist and don't fell for their delusions), but in terms of Religion and academic side, they don't look biased as far as I've seen (Correct me if i'm wrong).
    SaranSDS008

  13. #13
    Senior Member mgtower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    4,193
    Reputation
    12394
    Type
    Ghosted by law and order.

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by SaranSDS008 View Post
    Damn, this Article Explains with Proof on How Wiki is Biased towards Left (Yep, progressive and Communist) using few Studies made by Universities: https://www.allsides.com/blog/wikipedia-biased. Heck, even Wikipedia's Co-Founder made his own research on it and confirms that's it's so badly biased: https://larrysanger.org/2020/05/wiki...-badly-biased/. So, Please Stop using Wikipedia if anyone still uses it to look for reliable info (You won't get one there lol). I would recommend switching to Britannica or Encarta or any other good encyclopedia out there for reliable info. These are only looking tainted/biased only on political side (Or in few academic side like that delusion called "Global" "Warming", "Animal""Conservation" or "Climate""Change". Just ignore these assholes lol. These Environmental Vegan Bitches who probably must be from some insane asylum, are spreading delusions which contradicts science. just pretend they don't exist and don't fell for their delusions), but in terms of Religion and academic side, they don't look biased as far as I've seen (Correct me if i'm wrong).
    I got the antidote to that! Burn a tire and eat a tasty wild animal!

    The more they push, the more I'm gonna counter push! Until I run out of tires and wild animals!
    Tower's Book of Survival:

    Rule #401. First you eat the dogs, then you eat the dogfood.

  14. #14
    Junior Member SaranSDS008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    21
    Reputation
    32
    Type
    Ghost

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by mgtower View Post
    I got the antidote to that! Burn a tire and eat a tasty wild animal!

    The more they push, the more I'm gonna counter push! Until I run out of tires and wild animals!
    Nah, we won't definitely run out of tires tbh. but even if we have only few animals to Hunt (Or acc. to their definition, to "poach' at), we could have a farm to grow them and hunt those animals when they get older to just not run out of our juicy steak i guess lol.
    SaranSDS008

  15. #15
    Senior Member mgtower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    4,193
    Reputation
    12394
    Type
    Ghosted by law and order.

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by SaranSDS008 View Post
    Nah, we won't definitely run out of tires tbh. but even if we have only few animals to Hunt (Or acc. to their definition, to "poach' at), we could have a farm to grow them and hunt those animals when they get older to just not run out of our juicy steak i guess lol.
    Hunt?

    Not me, by the time we're that far down the road to perdition, I'll be strictly trapping, it helps keep the human competition to a minimum...
    Tower's Book of Survival:

    Rule #401. First you eat the dogs, then you eat the dogfood.

  16. #16

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Roxigo View Post
    I am a pretty na´ve person and I have no idea why someone would want to misrepresent MGTOW to such a malicious degree, it is nuts how twisted this explanation is and how it even made it past the Wikipedia moderators. If someone can shed light as to how a group of people can be so vindictive, feel free to enlighten me.
    What do MGTOW's ultimately want? To be left alone.

    It's a reasonable request. So reasonable, in fact, that there's no sensible way to oppose it. But feminism must oppose it because feminism is dependent upon access to male spaces, extraction of male resources, etc.

    So, the only real option for the feminists is to vilify MGTOW however they can. They have too much to lose to ever risk being honest about us and what we want.

    Btw, this is why a majority of feminists will reeeeeeee if you categorize feminism as a female supremacist ideology. They know what bad optics and vilification can do to a movement. Hence, the ongoing mantra "It's about equality" every time the subject comes up.

  17. #17
    Member DanielPlainview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    104
    Reputation
    168
    Type
    Bachelor

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Haha, what a load of horse shit. Good reminder never to donate to Wikipedia, thank you.

    also includes the men's rights movement, incels, and pickup artists.
    What the fuck do MRAs, incels and pickup artists have in common? Just bundled a bunch of men's groups to try and shame them by aligning them with incels.

    MGTOW overlaps with the alt-right and white supremacist movement
    Lol, I'm not white and not really right wing, definitely not alt-right. Never seen even a sniff of white supremacist ideology in any MGTOW community.

    I am reminded of what I once heard about Wikipedia and the politically sensitive articles: they are a battlefield where the saddest people with the most time on their hands always win.

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Bumfuck, Egypt
    Posts
    2,484
    Reputation
    9443
    Type
    Ghost

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by DanielPlainview View Post
    Haha, what a load of horse shit. Good reminder never to donate to Wikipedia, thank you.







    Lol, I'm not white and not really right wing, definitely not alt-right. Never seen even a sniff of white supremacist ideology in any MGTOW community.
    I remember one or two boot stompers trying their luck, but they soon had a line through their name. Ya can't have that shit. As far as "white supremacist," I'm closer to "white trash." These idiots think all white males are rich oppressors. I wish.
    Every day I make the world a little bit worse.

  19. #19
    Junior Member bokie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Posts
    23
    Reputation
    32
    Type
    Neutral

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Wikipedia is full of biased, false and misleading information. One of the latest entries I came across is the one describing Project Veritas discussed on Timcast:

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/zyFCEEOlby4/

    ... and it's only going to get worse.
    The wisest men follow their own direction. - Euripides

  20. #20

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    i would say we need to start re-defining/stating what MGTOW is a group that espouses equality between Men and Women, so when they say MGTOW is a hate group we should counter with the Fact "MGTOW is a group supporting equality for all, unlike feminism which is a hate group".

    Or something along those lines.

    my grandfather told me at a very young age "boy, there is only one thing a woman wants from a man...... it's 6 inches long and has a head on it..... and its a dollar bill"


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: September 27, 2021, 7:17 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: July 4, 2020, 8:46 AM
  3. soy boy 'life coach' misrepresents mgtow
    By Opaque in forum Lounge
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: August 30, 2019, 8:55 AM
  4. Wikipedia and politics
    By Mr Wombat in forum Lounge
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: April 5, 2016, 2:24 AM
  5. Feminists in Wikipedia
    By smallbitsoffire in forum Lounge
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: June 4, 2015, 4:08 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •