Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 38 of 38
  1. #21

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Feminists: "Men need to f*** off!"

    MGTOW *f*** off as instructed*

    Feminists: "No, not like that! Come back so that we can tell you to f*** off!"

  2. #22
    Super Moderator Mr Wombat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    5,154
    Reputation
    23973
    Type
    Neutral

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Roxigo View Post
    Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW /ˈmɪɡtaʊ/) is an anti-feminist, misogynistic, mostly online community advocating for men to separate themselves from women and from a society which they believe has been corrupted by feminism. The community is a part of the manosphere, a collection of anti-feminist websites and online communities that also includes the men's rights movement, incels, and pickup artists.
    Like other manosphere communities, MGTOW overlaps with the alt-right and white supremacist movements, and it has been implicated in online harassment of women. The Southern Poverty Law Center categorizes MGTOW as a part of the male supremacist ideology.
    So much for Wikipedia's "Neutral Point of View".

  3. #23

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Wombat View Post
    So much for Wikipedia's "Neutral Point of View".
    They didn't really maintain objectivity, did they? I'm DONE supporting them with money and labor. There are several Wikipedia articles on technology that I've written. No more. There's a huge need for a truly objective encyclopedia. I wish World Book or Britannica would make online versions. I don't even know if they're still in business.

    I need to write to Wikipedia to let them know why I don't support them anymore.

  4. #24
    Senior Member mgtower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    4,212
    Reputation
    12416
    Type
    Ghosted by law and order.

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by TigPlaze View Post
    They didn't really maintain objectivity, did they? I'm DONE supporting them with money and labor. There are several Wikipedia articles on technology that I've written. No more. There's a huge need for a truly objective encyclopedia. I wish World Book or Britannica would make online versions. I don't even know if they're still in business.

    I need to write to Wikipedia to let them know why I don't support them anymore.
    I love breakups! They WARM MY HEART! Do it! Lob an anvil in their woodchipper and walk away!

    I've written letters to the highest office in land regarding criminal activity orchestrated, perpetuated, condoned, concealed, and conspired within a deceased and long dead branch of government recklessly endangering US citizens, then walked away to the sound of crickets ever since.

    Dignity is an emotion that can't be scrubbed away only further awaken, at the same time it's vindicating. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that a cornerstone of red pill philosophy? Do we not put the screws to anyone or anything that offends us? Drill a big hole in the hull it and let'er sink? Did we not scuttle feminocracy?

    In any war of any kind, only scorched earth is the right thing to leave behind! Light'er up!
    Tower's Book of Survival:

    Rule #401. First you eat the dogs, then you eat the dogfood.

  5. #25

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    I should make a thread about this, but it's easy to understand when you realize misogyny has been re-defined as "anything that does not agree with or promote feminism / gynocentricism".

    It's no longer the polarity of misandry.

    This is why misogyny is illegal in some places like the UK (hate crime) yet misandry is not.
    Because it is no longer "hatred of women" it is "a term for those who don't support women unilaterally and unconditionally". If you oppose clown world you are automatically a misogynist. Note I say those and not men...women who speak out against feminism have been accused of it too.

    So look at the world with your new lens of what misogyny is and it makes perfect sense how a man choosing to opt out of marriage and dating is misogynistic; such a choice does not promote marriage, relationships, wealth transfer to women, supporting women at the sacrifice of supporting yourself, paying for other peoples kids, and at extreme ghost levels, opting to work less / earn less to pay less taxes into the pro-women socialist trough.

  6. #26

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by nothingness View Post
    I should make a thread about this, but it's easy to understand when you realize misogyny has been re-defined as "anything that does not agree with or promote feminism / gynocentricism".

    It's no longer the polarity of misandry.

    This is why misogyny is illegal in some places like the UK (hate crime) yet misandry is not.
    Because it is no longer "hatred of women" it is "a term for those who don't support women unilaterally and unconditionally". If you oppose clown world you are automatically a misogynist. Note I say those and not men...women who speak out against feminism have been accused of it too.

    So look at the world with your new lens of what misogyny is and it makes perfect sense how a man choosing to opt out of marriage and dating is misogynistic; such a choice does not promote marriage, relationships, wealth transfer to women, supporting women at the sacrifice of supporting yourself, paying for other peoples kids, and at extreme ghost levels, opting to work less / earn less to pay less taxes into the pro-women socialist trough.
    It's bizarre, isn't it? Imagine a bunch of people at a chess tournament, a bunch of men and women. Then they announce over the PA that for all remaining matches, the woman player will get an extra queen and men will play without a queen and with no rooks. So then a bunch of dudes get up and say, "Fuck that. I'm out." And they leave. Then the remaining women there and whatever dudes stayed (agreeing to be walked on) brand those who left as misogynists.

    That's basically it. We simply decided to opt out. We don't want to play a game with the odds stacked ridiculously against us. And they hate us for it. We never said we hated the other chess players. We only said we would not play under bad rules.

  7. #27
    Member DanielPlainview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    105
    Reputation
    169
    Type
    Bachelor

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Reminds me of something I once read which stuck with me, feminism is the refuge of undesirable (fat, ugly etc.) women because the unspoken promise of a post-feminist society, with a massively lowered beauty standard and with men demonised for having standards, is that men will then find them attractive.

    Turns out, even without all this bullshit, men would rather remain single than date them. Can't blame em for being a bit mad.

  8. #28

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    That's an interesting point because the hard core feminists and media etc seem to have a side gig lately of body shaming women who aren't fat whilst promoting fat acceptance for women.

  9. #29
    Member DanielPlainview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    105
    Reputation
    169
    Type
    Bachelor

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Yeah, feminists hate attractive women, or rather they hate anything which holds them to a standard. For example, they're absolutely delighted whenever they take jobs away from attractive women (booth babes, page 3 girls...) even though their existence has zero impact on their lives.

  10. #30

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by DanielPlainview View Post
    Reminds me of something I once read which stuck with me, feminism is the refuge of undesirable (fat, ugly etc.) women because the unspoken promise of a post-feminist society, with a massively lowered beauty standard and with men demonised for having standards, is that men will then find them attractive.

    Turns out, even without all this bullshit, men would rather remain single than date them. Can't blame em for being a bit mad.
    Good point. Feminism is LYING to women. Their promise that all men one day will desire obese, blimp-shaped women with hairy armpits and hairy legs is NOT going to happen. Even the totally cucked feminized men don't go for women like that. They won't admit it. They'll tote the party line, but in reality, even they won't choose the totally gross women, or if they're brainwashed enough to do so, they won't stick with her.

    Men aren't attracted to fat, unhealthy women. It's just how it is. It's just how biology works, and no one can change it, any more than you can change gravity.

  11. #31
    Member FireBird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Classifed
    Posts
    48
    Reputation
    75
    Type
    Ghost

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Do ya guys really expect Feminist to understand MGTOW? They have no empathy for men in general.

  12. #32

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by FireBird View Post
    Do ya guys really expect Feminist to understand MGTOW? They have no empathy for men in general.
    That's a good point. As long as feminists are brainwashed into their dogma, they're incapable of understanding men or with empathizing with us. They see us as subhuman. They have a terrorist attitude toward us, that our lives are worthless and don't matter in any way.

    It would be POSSIBLE for a feminist to understand MGTOW, but only after she got deprogrammed for all her feminist hate. It's ironic how feminists spew hate day after day and then accuse us of being hateful. Anyone who thinks is appropriate to use language like "mansplaining" or "kill all men" is not someone who sees men as human beings.

  13. #33

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by OwenWentFullMGTOW View Post
    What do MGTOW's ultimately want? To be left alone.

    It's a reasonable request. So reasonable, in fact, that there's no sensible way to oppose it. But feminism must oppose it because feminism is dependent upon access to male spaces, extraction of male resources, etc.

    So, the only real option for the feminists is to vilify MGTOW however they can. They have too much to lose to ever risk being honest about us and what we want.

    Btw, this is why a majority of feminists will reeeeeeee if you categorize feminism as a female supremacist ideology. They know what bad optics and vilification can do to a movement. Hence, the ongoing mantra "It's about equality" every time the subject comes up.
    Great points. I think "Feminism is about equality" has to be the biggest lie of the 21st century. I can't think of a bigger lie. Can anyone here?

  14. #34
    Senior Member mgtower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    4,212
    Reputation
    12416
    Type
    Ghosted by law and order.

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by TigPlaze View Post
    Great points. I think "Feminism is about equality" has to be the biggest lie of the 21st century. I can't think of a bigger lie. Can anyone here?
    The world is flat, just as flat as that pie plate moon we see at night!
    Tower's Book of Survival:

    Rule #401. First you eat the dogs, then you eat the dogfood.

  15. #35

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by mgtower View Post
    The world is flat, just as flat as that pie plate moon we see at night!
    True, that's a whopper of a lie, but it's not anywhere near as accepted as feminism's lie.

  16. #36

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    I just noticed the same thing today! MGTOW is *not* at all misogynistic or right-wing, at least not in theory. Only a woman could have written such nonsense, probably in an attempt to make MGTOW look bad because no one wants to have babies with her anymore. Maybe MGTOW sites such as this one should clarify this misunderstanding in some prominent place on the home page for people researching MGTOW for the first time.

    P.S.--More generally, don't trust Wikipedia for information on *any* controversial topic that goes against an agenda promoted by the people in power. Such topics include chemtrails, Morgellon's disease, Serbo-Croatia, 9/11, and more.

  17. #37
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Posts
    7
    Reputation
    12
    Type
    Bachelor

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Google any variation of Sexism and itís ONLY against women.

  18. #38

    Re: Feminists misrepresents MGTOW on Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by TigPlaze View Post
    Great points. I think "Feminism is about equality" has to be the biggest lie of the 21st century. I can't think of a bigger lie. Can anyone here?
    Yep. But you'd get banned from literally everything for saying it.


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: September 27, 2021, 7:17 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: July 4, 2020, 8:46 AM
  3. soy boy 'life coach' misrepresents mgtow
    By Opaque in forum Lounge
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: August 30, 2019, 8:55 AM
  4. Wikipedia and politics
    By Mr Wombat in forum Lounge
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: April 5, 2016, 2:24 AM
  5. Feminists in Wikipedia
    By smallbitsoffire in forum Lounge
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: June 4, 2015, 4:08 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •