https://www.thecut.com/2019/10/eliza...&utm_source=tw
Video here:
https://twitter.com/briantylercohen/...69354014662656
Warren is asked what she thinks about someone who is traditional and views marriage as between a man and woman. Her response is typically female in that she avoids logic and just insults such people saying "then marry a woman....assuming you can find one".
Do you really think men will be dealt with respectfully in her presidency? There were plenty of diplomatic ways to answer this such as "I respect the values of people of faith but they cannot override the principles of freedom and the individual choices of others". But instead she instantly characterized the question as an inappropriate opinion "held by men" and that such men are obvious ugly, undesirable since they hold an opinion different than hers.
If you want to see why this is messed up, imagine a male candidate saying this to a woman.
And of course the audience loves it because this is the hyperpartisan, vulgar world we live in where putdowns are thought of more highly than considered judgment.
Maybe in the feminist echo chamber Warren inhabits, surrounded by fembeast harpies and acquiescent males who laugh along with this stuff, this is all cool. In the general, men make up half the voters; and men do influence their wives' choice (make what you want of it). Until the left figures out that the rest of the country is not like them, they will keep being misandrist and assuming they can get away with it....until election day.