Thread: New Crisis: Why your swiping behavior on dating apps might be racist

"The authors of a new book are arguing for race-blind dating apps — and the removal of filters for race and ethnicity . . . " NY PostNYPost ^ | 2/10/21 | Asia Grace
"Mish, a black executive assistant to C-suite business administrators, told The Post that her digital quest for companionship reaped a paltry handful of bad love connections.
“I’m very turned off by dating sites now,” the 53-year-old Bronx native insisted. “They make me feel uneasy. Like I’m not being seen as the beautiful queen I am.”
Here you go boys, MAN UP, She is tired of waiting and of bad love connections . . . LOL

Originally Posted by CPRA

"The authors of a new book are arguing for race-blind dating apps — and the removal of filters for race and ethnicity . . . " NY PostNYPost ^ | 2/10/21 | Asia Grace
"Mish, a black executive assistant to C-suite business administrators, told The Post that her digital quest for companionship reaped a paltry handful of bad love connections.
“I’m very turned off by dating sites now,” the 53-year-old Bronx native insisted. “They make me feel uneasy. Like I’m not being seen as the beautiful queen I am.”
Here you go boys, MAN UP, She is tired of waiting and of bad love connections . . . LOL

Personal preference is a crime here on the planet of Lockdown.

Reconsider, or your intestinator will be activated.

“The idea of having racial preferences is unacceptable and illegal in any other arena,” she added. “But it’s literally built into the structure of these dating apps.”

Turn the clock ahead ten years. You get a notice in the mail on your 21st birthday from the Bureau Of Federal Partner Matching. You open the envelope and pull out a single sheet of paper. On it, you read:

Dear Mr. Smith,

Congratulations on your recent birthday. The Bureau would like to inform you that your life partner has been selected. You may pick her up at her Section 8 housing apartment, along with her three out-of-wedlock children. She is fond of Big Macs and blue hair dye. We hope you enjoy your lives together. Remember, personal preferences are racist!

Very truly yours,
Joe Strubachincoscow

Poor baby! All of those hundreds upon hundreds of date opportunities a week are not good enough. They used ''Hi how are you'' on the first message, they were too short, didn't earn enough money, were too white, did not use the right micro-calibrated opener of 20% humour 80% genuine in order to make her lil heart melt.. where have all the good men gone?

This while the bottom half of the population recieve little to 0 messages and dates from dating apps, who recieve the largest amount of discrimination. I read a graph and there was like a 94% advantage to women on the dating app. So its comparable to a very large proportion of men living on the street, while all women live in high-end mansions. The feminist response is this is 'nature' but maybe when men reject you because you are too old, suddenly its a intergalactical crime against humanity. Feminists use the argument of 'preference' when it literally suits them.

I ran experiments with black women and had literally hundreds of date opportunities using photographs in her attraction group. What she is getting at is she can't get the top 15% of men, while rejecting the bottom percentage, so she feels she is being discriminated against. Until data-gatherers 'man up' and start publishing evidence that goes against this feminist agenda, the world will stay exactly where it is. What makes it worse is the very high proportion of feminists in journalism, means these types of lie-pushing books are presented as facts and given air time.

There is one thing these types of book never show you - the evidence. Society will begin to move forward when we ask for 'evidence' from each other. So many women will lie (not all but most) in order to pull themselves into the victim frame, as generally in our society victims cannot be criticised, which puts people at a psychological advantage through deception.

Originally Posted by kru-kut

“The idea of having racial preferences is unacceptable and illegal in any other arena,” she added. “But it’s literally built into the structure of these dating apps.”

Turn the clock ahead ten years. You get a notice in the mail on your 21st birthday from the Bureau Of Federal Partner Matching. You open the envelope and pull out a single sheet of paper. On it, you read:

Dear Mr. Smith,

Congratulations on your recent birthday. The Bureau would like to inform you that your life partner has been selected. You may pick her up at her Section 8 housing apartment, along with her three out-of-wedlock children. She is fond of Big Macs and blue hair dye. We hope you enjoy your lives together. Remember, personal preferences are racist!

Very truly yours,
Joe Strubachincoscow

Cha'click

(((BANG!)))

Thud...

Isn't it odd that the ones screaming about "My Body My Choice" are now the ones screaming "Choice Isn't Fair" when the results don't line up with their preferences.

And then, the article was about a book just published. Wonder if the racism gravy train was a factor. Make a bit of pocket money off a current trend, maybe get onto one of the "news" (don't make me laugh) networks, or even that three-ring circus The View, sell lots more books. You know the left wing's old adage: Never let a crisis go to waste. Now it's this: If one doesn't exist, manufacture one out of thin air, because there's enough suckers out there that you can get rich off it.

Today: race is not a basis for mate choice. Check. Tomorrow: income is not a basis for mate choice. Check. Day after tomorrow: looks are not a basis for mate choice. Obviously this isn't going to lead the still-blue-pilled anywhere good. (Not that they were headed in that direction in the first place, but that's a separate discussion.)

You know, in any other context, being forced to have sex with someone you do not want to have sex with is called "rape".

Originally Posted by Mr Wombat

You know, in any other context, being forced to have sex with someone you do not want to have sex with is called "rape".

No doubt that is the case and no one disputes it, however I believe sexual preferences are much more complex and not just as innate than we realise and do change. For instance in the 1960s a lot of women did not want to sleep with black men due to attitudes regarding interracial marriages. As the social status of black men increased we can see it reflected in interracial marriage rates. Right now in the UK, they are as high as ever. This makes sense too because beauty is a matter of geometrical shapes, culture and not necessarily colour, although white skin was often portrayed as most beautiful. Everyone knows that hollywood prefers to use men/women with a certain facial structure. We are presented with 'beauty' almost daily in the form of shapes and facial characteristic patterns. We could probably tell with good accuracy from a picture of single men who would be having most success with women..

Conventional unattractive men are often portrayed as the underdogs and the losers. The social status of unattractive men is rather low if we do not know their actual social status. Also unattractive people are disadvantaged in the work place, have less social opportunities, less pay, are selected less for promotions, commit suicide more frequently, are judged more harshly. This is all statistical fact based on research in social psychology. Although many people even in important industries which involve cultural change, do not even acknowledge it because they benefit from these beauty priviledges themselves...

In conclusion sexual preferences are not entirely 'innate' and are subject to bend and change based on culture. It is just as a society we are only really grazing the beggining of true equality for everyone. Of course when I say conventionally unattractive it is based on pure facial structures and not weight. Of course if someone is overweight that may degrade someones opinion of them.

Interesting thought; when have we ever seen someone with downs syndrome portrayed as attractive? Never. They often do not marry or only marry each other. Feminism needs to understand this isn't just a male issue, this actually reflects on women too, even down to the women who can't get the top 15% of males. No one is free until everyone is free.

I came across an article today that stated that non-whites cannot be racist, they are "racially cautious". Sounds like a double standard describing rape as surprise sex.

53, abrasive, and living in the Bronx? And you think you are a "queen?" The queen of what? The South Bronx?

From the article:

75 in-depth interviews

These women are fucked in the head and, of course, will always complain when interviewed. Snore.

“When we first met, he made a point of telling me how much he loved black women,” Mish told The Post.

He was sexually aggressive during their first in-person meet-up last year. After finally engaging in consensual sex, he ghosted her.

She later discovered he had a sordid history of fetishizing black women for his personal pleasures, then dumping them once he’d had his fun.

“He targets black women because we’re seen as sexual objects, nothing more,” she said, noting that they never spoke again.

This is no problem. It's common for a guy to go for a certain type of woman. It's that slanted description of him that's the problem.

Gee, and I thought the complaint of this article was the exclusion of black women on dating apps. Looks like this guy is doing his part to rectify that, but someone still doesn't like it. He made it a point to tell her he loved black women, not specifically her. Hello? Bueller?

She fucks him anyway and retroactively complains, I don't like what I consented to do. I open my legs right away to catch a decent man but all I get is fucked! Change the app! Change men! Change the world! But don't tell me to change anything that I do! I live in a retroactive reality! Who's next to fuck me on our first meet-up? I'll keep trying until I find me my Prince Charming!"

And how would she discover his sexual history? Did a bunch of easy broads all get together and say, "yeah I fucked him on our first in-person meet-up, the bastard!

For Nicole, a 39-year-old Afro Caribbean single mother from Brooklyn, receiving overly sexual overtures from non-black men on apps has become an unwelcome norm.

Sounds like she needs to avail herself of the filters/apps that disallow the types of people she does not want to hear from. You know, filters, those things the article seems to make a problem?

“I’m on these apps hoping to find a meaningful relationship and these guys are treating me like a sex object before even extending a proper ‘Hello,’” the Brooklyn resident added.

Oh, boo hoo. Everybody gets unwanted approaches, snowflake. You simply ignore those ones.

So, which sex app is she expecting to behave like Christian Singles? Does her app photo show her dressed like a Christian single?

“But there’s a disconnect between who they are in real life versus the Jezebel stereotype they’re being subjected to online.”

Hell, I can say that about me!

If we were to show this article to someone in the early 2000, they would define that woman as clinically mentally insane.

Originally Posted by kru-kut

“The idea of having racial preferences is unacceptable and illegal in any other arena,” she added. “But it’s literally built into the structure of these dating apps.”

Turn the clock ahead ten years. You get a notice in the mail on your 21st birthday from the Bureau Of Federal Partner Matching. You open the envelope and pull out a single sheet of paper. On it, you read:

Dear Mr. Smith,

Congratulations on your recent birthday. The Bureau would like to inform you that your life partner has been selected. You may pick her up at her Section 8 housing apartment, along with her three out-of-wedlock children. She is fond of Big Macs and blue hair dye. We hope you enjoy your lives together. Remember, personal preferences are racist!

Very truly yours,
Joe Strubachincoscow

This is too obvious and would be resisted.

What is more insidious is that, whether you are aware of it or not, whether you want to or not, you, as a working, single male, are already paying for her Section 8 apartment, her health care, her three out-of-wedlock children with three different men, and the EBT card she used to buy fast food with your taxes.

You will work for up to 50 years, and in that time, you will support a 16 year old single mother, her children, her grandchildren, and her grandchildren. (Yes, our wonderful system of vote-farming produces 50 year grandmothers, all of them will vote to transfer wealth from you to them.)

Sam, I agree with your post, except for the first sentence.

1) Indoctrination by public schools starting from kindergarten. That will include telling children they're doing the right thing by turning in their parents for wrong thought.

2) Americans are, as a whole, a nation of cream puffs. They'll take any sort of evil thrown at them as long as they can have their smartphones, social media, and Starbucks.

Whew
Im so glad there are 300 genders, because I now identify as heliosexual. I have gov protection to only mate with Apache Attack helicopters

Originally Posted by FrankS

Whew
Im so glad there are 300 genders, because I now identify as heliosexual. I have gov protection to only mate with Apache Attack helicopters

I don't identify as anything, and that leaves me with an identity crisis!

I hope I like me when I find out who I am? My luck, I'll murder the SOB!

https://www.essence.com/news/why-it-...-they-deserve/

Further reading on the dating habits of black women.

Originally Posted by Jan

https://www.essence.com/news/why-it-...-they-deserve/

Further reading on the dating habits of black women.

What is interesting in the UK from statistical data, is that white women date black men, white men date asian women, but you never see a asian (pakistani/indian) woman dating a white male. I have spoken to many pakistani females about this and I am told it is because they are not allowed to.

Originally Posted by ShogunRonin

What is interesting in the UK from statistical data, is that white women date black men, white men date asian women, but you never see a asian (pakistani/indian) woman dating a white male. I have spoken to many pakistani females about this and I am told it is because they are not allowed to.

So, there ARE subcultures within the western world that can impose SOME limits on hypergarmy?!?!

Originally Posted by kru-kut

Sam, I agree with your post, except for the first sentence.

1) Indoctrination by public schools starting from kindergarten. That will include telling children they're doing the right thing by turning in their parents for wrong thought.

2) Americans are, as a whole, a nation of cream puffs. They'll take any sort of evil thrown at them as long as they can have their smartphones, social media, and Starbucks.

This connects back to what I was saying in another thread.

Budget cuts have taken out Physical Education, auto shop, wood shop, and other classes that strengthen masculinity.

Budget cuts were also cited as the reason for taking Home Economics out of the curriculum.

In reality, they were taken out because the feminists wanted to subvert traditional female roles,
and the the capitalists can't sell pre-packaged and take-out foods to someone who knows how to make a meal from scratch,
can't sell cheap, disposable clothing to someone who knows how to properly wash/iron a shirt, darn a sock, or replace a lost button.

I read interviews with welfare recipients who believed they HAD to use their public assistance to buy fast food/prepared foods,
because neither they, nor their mom, knew how to buy a raw chicken from the grocery store and cook it.
They were as clueless about doing it as you would be landing the a jumbo jet after the pilot had a heart attack.
Turn raw rice - out of the bag - into food you could eat? How do you do that?
And social workers across the country smiled, because it guaranteed employment for them, their children, and their grand children.

Boys that have never driven a car with a clutch. Boys that have never driven a car.
Boys that have never turned a wrench, mown a lawn, learned how to preserve and maintain leather.
Boys that have never developed a callous.

"...smartphones, social media, and Starbucks" indeed.