Thread: Abortionist's collection of human remains found in his home sick home!

Here's what the mass media doesn't want us to see in their perfect utopia of death and destruction.

Sickness only gets sicker when it's not eradicated, instead they exalt it to new levels of trepidation.

The fruits of feminism are pain, death, and dismemberment.

Could you do this?

https://aclj.org/pro-life/authoritie...LpFBR_typ-NL_C

I was hesitant to click on the link you provided in case it was full of graphic images but thankfully it is nothing of the sort. Indeed it is a well written and informative article.

This should be headline news around the world, but as you say that doesn’t fit into the left wing gynocentic paradigm.

The whole notion of abortion on demand makes me sick, but this evil c*nt took it to a whole other level, and no doubt there are more like him out there as alluded to in the article.

But to answer your question directly, no, no way in hell. There is nothing on this earth that could even tempt me to do that shit.

Nations are constitutions of law and order.

Whenever any nation strays from the golden rule of preservation and trust (as did these United States of America) showering in their own blood, the only option becomes to abstain one's self from the bloodbath of moral confusion. I am not a citizen, I am an outcast, a relic from a bygone era where freedom ruled over the land and the law was wholesome, just, and delivered safety, security, prosperity, and happiness.

What we have now is living hell on earth. Only fools stick around to be incinerated!

In all holocausts, it was the people that were blindly deluded in ignorance to believe otherwise.

The line between citizen and government has been offensively breached in multiple grievous acts that can't be ignored or erased, they're branded in the paradigm we call history, and you can bet your bottom dollar history will be very kind and considerate to the men that formed MGTOW.

We're the arrogant unabashed relentless flaming truth thrown in their face, LTMFs'B!

Originally Posted by mgtower

LTMFs'B!

Question? Let The Motha F'ers Burn?

Ya'volt!

Every time a left-winger female aborts a child it's one less "child of a single mother" and one less child the rest of us has to pay for.
The way these people are voting themselves out of existence couldn't make me happier.

This is why these scum bags need to indoctrinate other people's children - it's the only way they can approximate reproduction.
This is why they infiltrate school systems and government agencies responsible for writing policies for early childhood education.

Job #1 is to indoctrinate otherwise mentally healthy children with gender confusion and concepts that are far from age appropriate.

So yeah, to me abortion is not a bad thing. The worst thing is the birth of an unwanted human being.

Looked up news articles, local stations the BBC and FOX. About 25 total, not getting a lot of coverage. Guess that should be expected.

This is probably the most disturbing and sickening thread I ever had the misfortune to reply to. I am not a big fan of women's actions, that you all know. When it comes to women killing babies, then these cunts make me sick.. Some asshole burying them in his backyard, what the fuck is going on? If this is how women fight for "my body, my right" then no woman should be touched, his body, his right..
Fuck them, let those soulless bitches rot in hell.

Originally Posted by Insidious_Sid

Every time a left-winger female aborts a child it's one less "child of a single mother" and one less child the rest of us has to pay for.
The way these people are voting themselves out of existence couldn't make me happier.

This is why these scum bags need to indoctrinate other people's children - it's the only way they can approximate reproduction.
This is why they infiltrate school systems and government agencies responsible for writing policies for early childhood education.

Job #1 is to indoctrinate otherwise mentally healthy children with gender confusion and concepts that are far from age appropriate.

So yeah, to me abortion is not a bad thing. The worst thing is the birth of an unwanted human being.

How would you feel about abortion if the responsibility of children fell solely and primarily on the parents with no social services, welfare, or free handouts taken from your dinner plate? Just consider the act itself in all it's barbaric nature then ask yourself if you condone? I saw a video of an abortion 37 years ago, it solidified my present belief that abortion is an atrocity and a holocaust that future peoples will shutter to think as did past peoples. For now we are in a perverted and devious society with social and moral cancer wrought in the fires of feminism.

I stand in utter contrast and objection to this wayward self mutilating society.

I feel cleaner inside when I properly delineate and segregate all bastard bastions of feminism's "think" and "counter think" from my life. I tend to seek out that which is pure righteousness then firmly plant my ass there, grow roots, and stay like an old oak tree!

Counter think, case in point; why not abort the both of them? Mother and child? Both are socially useless, both would solve the sole survivor syndrome and a host of other mental illnesses that saturate post abortion women, both would insure against unwanted repeats, both would save a king's ransom if applied across the land! just flush the entire kitten kaboodle, all problems solved. Right?

No judgments from me, I'm talking pure logic and reasoning. Who am I to judge? But a fool am I to deny pure righteousness after contemplation and extrapolation.

Righteousness stands alone, it has no friends outside the very few that seek it out and ignite it's eternal flame.

In future annuls of history it will be recorded that this is the era when humanity decided it was morally acceptable to kill its own children. What a sad thought. I sometimes wonder what future generations will think of us.

I used to disagree with the harsh punishments meted out in the Koran. Stoning an adulterous woman seemed so barbaric to my western ears. As we watch gynocentric society decay however, it seems more and more obvious that most humans are simply animals driven by basic stimulus-response dynamics that I now at least understand the harshness even though I still feel there has be be a more gentle way of correcting vile behavior.

With that regard, I also have come to the conclusion that abortion is a sickness trying to correct itself. Let them eradicate themselves. The problem as stated above though, is that this isn't good enough for them. They seem to insist of injecting their poisonous ideology in the the children of otherwise moral people.

This whole situation illustrates why pure democracy is a demon from hell. The minority of people with morals couldn't wall themselves off if they wanted to. The SJW police would swoop in and ensure that this renegade community were brought to heel. The SJW doctrine would be forced onto their kids via the school system once again. Unfortunately in the US, the concept of a republic seems to have evaporated.

Also, this sick bastard didn't bury them in his back yard. He medically preserved them. I don't know how this story doesn't start to turn the mind of even idealistically pro-choice people. The demons have been released.

Originally Posted by pbisque

I used to disagree with the harsh punishments meted out in the Koran. Stoning an adulterous woman seemed so barbaric to my western ears. As we watch gynocentric society decay however, it seems more and more obvious that most humans are simply animals driven by basic stimulus-response dynamics that I now at least understand the harshness even though I still feel there has be be a more gentle way of correcting vile behavior.

With that regard, I also have come to the conclusion that abortion is a sickness trying to correct itself. Let them eradicate themselves. The problem as stated above though, is that this isn't good enough for them. They seem to insist of injecting their poisonous ideology in the the children of otherwise moral people.

This whole situation illustrates why pure democracy is a demon from hell. The minority of people with morals couldn't wall themselves off if they wanted to. The SJW police would swoop in and ensure that this renegade community were brought to heel. The SJW doctrine would be forced onto their kids via the school system once again. Unfortunately in the US, the concept of a republic seems to have evaporated.

Philosophy and religion have grappled with the concepts of human morality and ethics for eons. At what point do we draw a line saying this is primal animal behavior and this is a rational choice?

I used to support the idea of the public school system as being an important gauge of seeing how healthy a republic or democracy could be. But now I realize that the public school system has been warped beyond the original intent of teaching fundamental basics needed for young adults. Fortunately, home schooling and learning from the internet is gaining momentum because of the ease of access of information. That is why while there is indoctrination happening at the public school levels the younger generation is able to counter it. That is why generation Z is not falling pray to such misinformation coming from the public school system.

But in the end the social pendulum has to swing the other way when it comes to ideas of abortion for true social change to occur. If I had to guess the world's population dropping like a rock will probably force abortion to cease to exist in 50 years time as technology improves. Abortion will be viewed as a draconian medical technique just like shock therapy was for the mentally unstable decades ago.

Originally Posted by mgtower

How would you feel about abortion if the responsibility of children fell solely and primarily on the parents with no social services, welfare, or free handouts taken from your dinner plate? Just consider the act itself in all it's barbaric nature then ask yourself if you condone? I saw a video of an abortion 37 years ago, it solidified my present belief that abortion is an atrocity and a holocaust that future peoples will shutter to think as did past peoples. For now we are in a perverted and devious society with social and moral cancer wrought in the fires of feminism.

I stand in utter contrast and objection to this wayward self mutilating society.

I feel cleaner inside when I properly delineate and segregate all bastard bastions of feminism's "think" and "counter think" from my life. I tend to seek out that which is pure righteousness then firmly plant my ass there, grow roots, and stay like an old oak tree!

Counter think, case in point; why not abort the both of them? Mother and child? Both are socially useless, both would solve the sole survivor syndrome and a host of other mental illnesses that saturate post abortion women, both would insure against unwanted repeats, both would save a king's ransom if applied across the land! just flush the entire kitten kaboodle, all problems solved. Right?

No judgments from me, I'm talking pure logic and reasoning. Who am I to judge? But a fool am I to deny pure righteousness after contemplation and extrapolation.

Righteousness stands alone, it has no friends outside the very few that seek it out and ignite it's eternal flame.

I'll preface this by saying that I'm happy to discuss, so long as we don't descend into an abortion debate that would be counter to the MGTOW message and brotherhood.

I personally don't believe in conception being this sacred act. Perhaps it's the nihilism in me, and I realize the miraculous nature of conception, and I know our very species relies soley on that one pivotal moment. HOWEVER. We're not machines, we're human beings. To me, an unborn child unwanted by it's mother is already aborted - already dead. If children of single mothers do "less great" (or really, far less well) than kids with 2 parents, then it's safe to think an UNWANTED child of a single mother would do far worse. Look at the articles of children living in squalor, in their own filth, suffering all kinds of abuses. Sure, sometimes predatory men are involved, but if the mother had her shit together those kids would be protected at all costs. Or, at least the child would be given a fighting chance and not locked in a dark basement.

https://edmontonjournal.com/news/cri...ild-abuse-case

I have issues with late-term abortions. When an unborn baby can try and physically evade the tools being used to end it's life, I have a problem with that. If there is one differentiation between the fetus and the "unborn baby", perhaps this is it. In my opinion, something recoiling in pain and terror is no longer the "clump of cells" feminists purport it to be. Indeed, it's barbaric. However, I am in full support of the day after pill or early term abortions. In Canada, we have a (ahem) segment of the population where abortions are commonly used as a form of birth control. Young women are coming in multiple times a year, getting abortion after abortion. These are anecdotal reports from people who work in health centers, especially in remote areas of the country. In a lot of cases, these children would suffer from FAS (fetal alcohol syndrome) if the pregnancy was allowed to go full term. FAS is disproportionate among this same segment of the population, which is a matter of statistical fact. As a white male, I am sure that under Trudeau's Land of Hypocrisy just me referring loosely to such statistics is hate speech, especially being a white male. ("Privilege theory" states that I get to have no opinion on social issues, especially if they involve people higher on the victim totem pole of injustice, which, relatively, is everybody else.) All this said, I would be in favor of outlawing late-term abortions (after 20 weeks) if the mother's life was not in danger. 20 weeks is practically 5 months - that should be adequate time to decide.

So, to summarize, I think every child born deserves to at LEAST be born to a mother who wants that child.
I truly believe that a child born unwanted is far worse off than never having been conceived.

As for aborting both of them, well, some mothers HAVE shown they believe in retro-active abortion, aka abortion after conception which is murder. They call it "infanticide" which reminds me of the word "insecticide". In that case, an insect has merely eaten it's own. And yes, we can say that society would be better off without such a person. As a believer in capital punishment, I guess you could say I believe in "post conception abortion". People who sexually torture children and then dispose of them should die, in my opinion. (Now we're on to the capital punishment debate! LOL).

But here is the reality: we have all kinds of people having sex for fun and excitement. No marriage, no relationship - just sex for it's own sake. I think we've already smashed all things sacred at that point, if anything was sacred to begin with. To worry about unwanted conception at that point... isn't it a bit too late? We can't have a Liberal view towards sex and contraception but then switch to a Conservative view when it comes to abortion... can we? But, I find that is exactly what many people are doing. In my mind, worrying about morality after conception - it's too late.

So, to me, walking away from the mother aborting her child might just be the greatest symbol of walking away from the plantation.

I think a bigger crime is to convince a "victim of unwanted pregnancy" (cough-bullshit-cough) wanting to abort to go head and have the child anyways. These groups do what? Do they follow up with her and help her raise that child? Help with the needs of the child and her challenges as a single mother? Her guilt and shame and confusion in have an unwanted child? No, they walk away - their "godly" work complete, after handing her a pamphlet, a 'blankie' and a box of diapers. I think that act is far more vile than any abortion could ever be.

I say people who stop mothers from aborting should be signed up for child support. None of this "talk her out of it then fuck off" bullshit.

They need to put their wallets where their morals are.

Stopping a pregnancy is not "saving a baby" or "saving a life". It's bringing an unwanted child into the world then walking away so the "mother" (breeder) can fuck up the child's life and then hand society the tab. Truly a disgusting act awash in the cognitive dissonance of "doing gods work".

Originally Posted by Insidious_Sid

So yeah, to me abortion is not a bad thing. The worst thing is the birth of an unwanted human being.

I fully agree, there are countless kids living horrible lives finding food off rubbish tips etc in the third world. Here in the first world I can think of a handful of individuals, offspring of useless single mothers who are responsible for the majority of crime in my hometown. How much better off would we be if their mothers has aborted them. Ultimately using birth control properly in the first place would have been a far better option.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sp_rgqRugho

This outstanding video shows how things changed in society following the introduction of the birth control pill.
At 7:40 is the part on abortion.

We can't have a Liberal view towards sex and contraception but then switch to a Conservative view when it comes to abortion... can we?

I'm conservative on both sex and abortion, avoiding any hypocrisy. I have no reproductive or family rights, those "rights" have been "revoked" by feminism and gynocentric based legal system, I'm lawfully bound to whatever a female decides, either pro or anti, my opinion means nothing but my wallet does! She holds all the cards in a game I REFUSE TO PLAY!

All I have in regards to abortion is my worthless unaccounted opinion and nothing more. No blood on my hands and no enslavement, it's a win win on every hand!

If I had a pussy I wouldn't let any motherfucker near it!

You won't hear any hell fire and brimstone preaching on my end, that's not my position, I say shitcan women and all their bullshit in one sweeping blow, permanently and forever!

Every solitary bit of social unjust bullshit comes to a screeching halt for MGTOW! No turd left unflushed!

Being stripped of my reproductive rights (even in the case of sperm jacking) then to stand up and say a god damned thing about what they're doing with their reproductive rights (with constantly amended privileges) would make me about as White Knight fool as a man could be, wouldn't it? So all I can say is I have an non-valued opinion I can shove up my ass!

The judicial disconnect and gross indifference couldn't possibly be greater!

Let them hang out to dry on the same meat hook they had reserved for me!

No parlay.

One important correction from my last post:

As for aborting both of them, well, some mothers HAVE shown they believe in retro-active abortion, aka abortion after conception which is murder.

Should have read.
As for aborting both of them, well, some mothers HAVE shown they believe in retro-active abortion, aka abortion after giving birth which is murder.

Very important distinction. The former makes me an anti-abortionist / pro-life, which I am not.

@mgtower:

Yes, when I said liberal sexual views and conservative abortion views don't mix I should have qualified that statement, aka "In my opinion", because it doesn't make sense. Of course, the progressives will call it "victim blaming" where the victim spread her legs and got pregnant. Surely she felt compelled to fuck with no protection because Patriarchy. I recall one woman ranting in a comments section about this young Chad thug impregnanted her daugher and he alone was to blame because she was so sweet and innocent. I told her "Unless she slipped and fell into a puddle of his semen, your 'sweet and innocent' spread her legs for thug boy". Obviously, this was very triggering for her.

As for male reproductive rights, yes, we have one. Having sex is consenting to becoming a parent and paying for a child or children you may not even want for 18-25 years. "Her body her choice", but no "My DNA my choice". Once I put my DNA in her coochie, it's her property, and I get the bill for her choice.

I think Red Pilled men need to be very committed to using proper birth control, and even go as far as to ensure used condoms are properly disposed of. Trusting a woman to be "on birth control" is ludicrous. First off, she might not have the mental capacity to take a pill once every day. But more likely, if conception occurs, it was a whoopsie baby. Of course, women will quickly say: "Hey, this birth control method is not 100% effective." Indeed. It's 0% effective when you take it.

I think a major win for men is when SHE will have a choice: get consent of the man to reproduce using his DNA else be 100% on her own with the child.

"Keep it in your pants" is an antiquated social enforcement tool used to extract sex (and thus resources) out of men by exploiting their innate sexual desire.

We need to face facts: Women have children, especially today, to get resources from men and the government. The single mom I heard about recently that had a fourth child despite having three already... yeah, she needed a 4th kid. Child support should not be a job, but for many women it is. In fact, I wonder how many women actually plan to divorce when the kids are at a certain age. There is no telling the depth of female cunning and manipulation. But, we all know that "trap that man" is not a new phenomenon. It's not spoken of very often, because women don't handle shame well. But, it's a thing.

A very very dangerous thing.

Originally Posted by Insidious_Sid

I'll preface this by saying that I'm happy to discuss, so long as we don't descend into an abortion debate that would be counter to the MGTOW message and brotherhood.

Too late! This whole thread is about abortion and I don’t see how anyone can legitimately (pun intended) discuss the subject without weighing the pros and cons.

For me the whole question really is about when it is appropriate to take another life.

I am both pro-life and pro capital punishment – each with their own provisions. To many this is something of a contradiction, but to me there is no contradiction at all.

The person facing capital punishment has earned this ‘reward’, leaving aside of course the inconsistencies of the legal system leading to people being wrongfully convicted.

The unborn child has not. He or she is totally innocent. As to the life it may be led into being one of squalor or destitution, well what of it? You could equally say this about a three year old. Is it acceptable to arbitrarily decide to end that child’s life? I don’t think you’d get any takers to support that case!

Ask any biology student ‘at what point does life begin?’ The unanimous answer will be ‘at conception’.

We live in an age where there are many forms of contraception available to both men and women albeit some more effective than others. However, if you do not want a child some are 100% effective.

How about people taking some responsibility for their actions?

Originally Posted by Insidious_Sid

@mgtower:

Yes, when I said liberal sexual views and conservative abortion views don't mix I should have qualified that statement, aka "In my opinion", because it doesn't make sense. Of course, the progressives will call it "victim blaming" where the victim spread her legs and got pregnant. Surely she felt compelled to fuck with no protection because Patriarchy. I recall one woman ranting in a comments section about this young Chad thug impregnanted her daugher and he alone was to blame because she was so sweet and innocent. I told her "Unless she slipped and fell into a puddle of his semen, your 'sweet and innocent' spread her legs for thug boy". Obviously, this was very triggering for her.

As for male reproductive rights, yes, we have one. Having sex is consenting to becoming a parent and paying for a child or children you may not even want for 18-25 years. "Her body her choice", but no "My DNA my choice". Once I put my DNA in her coochie, it's her property, and I get the bill for her choice.

I think Red Pilled men need to be very committed to using proper birth control, and even go as far as to ensure used condoms are properly disposed of. Trusting a woman to be "on birth control" is ludicrous. First off, she might not have the mental capacity to take a pill once every day. But more likely, if conception occurs, it was a whoopsie baby. Of course, women will quickly say: "Hey, this birth control method is not 100% effective." Indeed. It's 0% effective when you take it.

I think a major win for men is when SHE will have a choice: get consent of the man to reproduce using his DNA else be 100% on her own with the child.

"Keep it in your pants" is an antiquated social enforcement tool used to extract sex (and thus resources) out of men by exploiting their innate sexual desire.

We need to face facts: Women have children, especially today, to get resources from men and the government. The single mom I heard about recently that had a fourth child despite having three already... yeah, she needed a 4th kid. Child support should not be a job, but for many women it is. In fact, I wonder how many women actually plan to divorce when the kids are at a certain age. There is no telling the depth of female cunning and manipulation. But, we all know that "trap that man" is not a new phenomenon. It's not spoken of very often, because women don't handle shame well. But, it's a thing.

A very very dangerous thing.

I like permanent solutions and instant-solve-all, here's how I solved the entire dilemma soup to nuts, cradle to grave.