Thread: A for attractive: Good-looking female college students saw their grades DROP during Covid pandemic 'when professors couldn't see their faces', study claims

A for attractive: Good-looking female college students saw their grades DROP during Covid pandemic 'when professors couldn't see their faces', study claims
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/a...-COVID-19.html

Attractive females saw their grades drop when classes and exams moved online during the pandemic, a study suggests.

Adrian Mehic, a post-doctoral researcher at Lund University, analyzed the scores of 300 male and female engineering students in Sweden before and after Covid hit.
A panel of more than 70 separate participants was asked to grade the attractiveness of each student based on photographs of their faces.
The study found a significant decline in average college grades among attractive female students — but only in 'qualitative' courses where teachers and students were more likely to interact.
These include classes like business and economics, where exams and coursework are graded subjectively.
In quantitative courses — like math and physics — where answers are usually simply correct or incorrect, the same trend was not observed. There was also no trend among males.
...

Very interesting, particularly because it wasn't deliberate.

"Waaaaaah I'm used to fluttering my eyelashes to get what I want, it's so unfair that I don't get what I want when people can't see me fluttering my eyelashes!"

No shock here, I noticed it all the way through school. Not just grades but class discipline as well, girls getting away with things boys would get into trouble for. When even the BBC admits this you know that there's a problem. Teachers 'give higher marks to girls' - BBC News. The same certainly applies to job interviews, promotion, the law, entry to nightclubs..........most of life in fact.

Originally Posted by Joe Magarac

A for attractive: Good-looking female college students saw their grades DROP during Covid pandemic 'when professors couldn't see their faces', study claims
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/a...-COVID-19.html



Very interesting, particularly because it wasn't deliberate.

Well my country which is a third world, developing my ass country. Teachers used to beat guys brutally and not a hand layed on women.

Yep more entitled women working it to get something for nothing, I bet if they didn't get a good grade they'd threaten the Professor with some Sexually inappropriate behavior if they didn't.

Oh no....anyways




Not our problem.

I have never met an attractive female who would not monetize it, if given the chance. If being attractive results in them being offered free drinks, free dinners, a better job or a better salary, I can not blame them too harshly for accepting it. After all, everyone likes a freebie. If I have any criticism for this practice where grades are determined, it is for the professor who is grading them unfairly high, rather than for the attractive girl who receives the higher grade she did not necessarily earn. If her value in the job market with her skills is increased based on her attractive looks, because she can make sales to some simp customer that she wouldn't ordinarily have made based on her skills alone, that's a failure of the simp to spend his money wisely.

If I am the business owner paying her more to make this sale, and making more money for my business from a simp customer who freely chose to waste his money this way, then the criticism, if there is any, should not be for me, the business owner, or the hot girl I hire and pay extra to use her looks to make the extra sales. The criticism is only for the simp. It is the simp who financed this whole sequence of events. It is the simp who is the critical piece without which this set of circumstances could not exist. It is the simp's choice that is the foundation here.

Everyone involved is involved voluntarily. Like the Hooters Restaurant chain, neither the girls or the customers are being forced to participate...

The problem here, however, is that looks are temporary, whereas most job skills are more durable. Job skills improve with experience and time. Looks do not. These simp professors and business owners are creating an artificial set of circumstances for these girls that will not last for them until the end of their lives. When the looks fade, the sexual market value (SMV) of these women will drop accordingly. But so will the job market value (JMV) if that is the only basis of the job market value that they ever had.

And just as I've never seen an attractive female who would pass up a chance to monetize it, I've never seen a formerly attractive post wall female who wasn't still looking for a free lunch. When the only value they ever had starts to drop, and their choices become either homelessness and starvation, OR lying, cheating, stealing and otherwise parasitizing someone else, the choice is similarly predictable. We have a society in the west that will not watch a woman starve. As a society, there is no stomach for it. For as long as it is able, the government will step in and confiscate money from whoever has it in order to continue to pass out freebies to women.

If it was only going to be the simp professor who would be taxed to support women who he set up to be helpless in their post wall life, I wouldn't care. But the simp professor is setting her up to be a parasite, and setting up every tax payer to finance that parasitism...