Thread: Leverage

Back in the 90s, I worked as a 3rd party B2B debt collector; in other words, I collected debts owed by one business to some other business. Most of the debtors were small companies with less than 25 employees, who for whatever reason ran into cash flow problems. The key to getting them to pay was using a combination of negotiation and leverage (the carrot and the stick). Without leverage, these debtor entities would ignore dunning notices and dodge phone calls. The leverage I used was threat of litigation. The carrot I used was a calm, firm, and somewhat friendly tone of voice. Upon making first contact, via telephone, with the owner or A/P manager, I calmly explained that I was a pre-litigation attorney, and it my my job to hear their side of the story and negotiate an out-of-court settlement between them and our client. I stressed that they needed to start working with me right away to resolve this issue, before their case got automatically assigned to a trial lawyer to file a complaint with the common pleas court. [70% of the time, the debtor company worked with me to resolve the issue; which normally was them paying 25% right away by BANK WIRE, and signing a 12 month payment plan for the balance plus 25% interest. And, this was a good deal for them, because they wouldn't get hit with paying our attorney fees to sue them in court. However, the other 30% of the time, the debtor company was on the verge of bankruptcy and effectively uncollectable; thus without leverage we AEXed the case and close it forever. AEX means All Efforts eXhausted.]

When dealing with women, be it your: mother, teenage or older daughter, co-workers, etc.,. . . you need leverage to keep them under control. For example: everytime my daughter gives me any disrespect whatsoever, I kill her internet acess by pressing a button on my tablet. It works like a charm, and I've got her trained not to give me any shit or else. Her training was not immediate, and involved her loss of the internet for months at a time. But, nowadays, when she tries to test my resolve, I need only reach for my tablet, and she will change her tone and start apologizing.

Moral of the story: If you can't get leverage over a woman, AEX her out of your life!

Fear and greed are among the most powerful emotions that effect human behavior.

Instinctively, women fear strangers and the ever present threat of being kidnapped, raped, and killed by some creeper; or worse a gang of creepers. The fictional TV series, Star-Trek TNG, capitalized on this deep seated fear by having Tasha Yar dramatically use the phrase "rape gangs" twice in season one. Once in the episode "Where No One has Gone Before", and again in "The Naked Now". Tasha was emotionally terrified to her core of those gangs, and this fact gave great depth and memoraibility to her fictional character.

Greed is the main emotional driver behind female hypergamy.

Fear is a the main emotional driver behind her need to constantly shit test.

Whether you are her: father, brother, boyfriend, or husband... deep down, she is very fearful of the outside world and is relying on you, as one of the men in her life, for protection.

You must be able to control her, for her to FEEL safe and secure. If she becomes frightened about anything at all, and just her watching TV can trigger this, she'll shit test the men in her life; in otherwords, she'll attempt to manipulate and control the men in her life. She needs these men to control her and put her back in her place, in order for her to feel safe and secure again. This is why it is critically important for a man to have some form of [legal] leverage over the women in his life.

The more Big Daddy government empowers women over men, the unhappier women in society become.

When a woman can dial 911, make false allegations, and get a restraining order tossing the man out of his own house.. it becomes nearly impossible for a man to gain any effective leverage over a cohabitating women. Big Daddy government has used its unlimited power to elevate women and empower them over men. IMO, this is at the root cause of the ever growing MGTOW awakening. And, women are the biggest losers in this whole social experiment of the past 50 to 100 years; as they lost nearly all the good men.

A "good man" is really, just a man who can make her feel safe and secure 100% of the time. This is why Bad Boys get all the pussy, in general, these are the only men who make women feel safe and secure.

If SCOTUS strikes down Roe v Wade, which they now seem poised to do, the WOMEN ARE GOING TO RIOT. This is because they won't feel comfortable having sex with Bad Boy [and economic loser] Chad anymore for fear of getting stuck having to give childbirth to his offspring.

Fifty years ago, before Roe v Wade, married men held a lot of leverage over their wives, [she couldn't get divorced without cause, she couldn't deny him sex, etc.], and as a result men were able to use this leverage to make her feel safe and secure.

Nowadays, if Roe is struck down, women are going to go crazy because virtually NO ACCEPTABLE MEN will be able to both fuck them and make them feel safe and secure. What the hell happens when most women in society cannot get their BASIC NEEDS met? I have no idea, but I've got a feeling we might soon find out.

While everybody talks about 1973 Roe v. Wade, I have read that the actual final law is 1992 Planned Parenthood v. Casey which affirmed Roe v. Wade. The Supreme Court in the pending Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization would be overturning both Roe and Casey.

It's probably welcome to everybody but women to know the fact that this means control is returned to state level. This does not mean that abortion has been banned nationally. Women will misunderstand in all ways possible if they think it will achieve their goals. Men have known this throughout the ages in their management of women and truth.

Originally Posted by Unboxxed

While everybody talks about 1973 Roe v. Wade, I have read that the actual final law is 1992 Planned Parenthood v. Casey which affirmed Roe v. Wade. The Supreme Court in the pending Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization would be overturning both Roe and Casey.

It's probably welcome to everybody but women to know the fact that this means control is returned to state level. This does not mean that abortion has been banned nationally. Women will misunderstand in all ways possible if they think it will achieve their goals. Men have known this throughout the ages in their management of women and truth.

You are correct, striking down Roe and Casey means control over abortion returns to the several states.

However, it will mark the point where the pendulum hit a wall and began swinging in the opposite direction.

There are Right to Life folks right now contemplating their next moves, such as:

1. States that outlaw all but medically necessary abortion, may start claiming a legal interest in every fetus carried by all women whose primary residence is within their state. And, these states may push federal laws which prohibit out-of-state abortions for their residents. And, women who get pregnant then try to move to an abortion friendly state, may find out the hard way, that it may take up to six months of living in that new state, before the law will recognize them as a legal resident of said new state. So, add it all up, and three to five years from now, over half of all the women living in the USA may be unable to obtain a legal abortion.

2. Seeking to amend the US Constitution to give fetuses with a heartbeat, the right to life. Thus prohibiting all abortions nationwide, which are not medically necessary to save the life of the mother.

There are Right to Life folks right now contemplating their next moves, such as:

I have read that the several relatively recent instances of liberal Talking Heads all fearing, at the same time, economic instability as a result of the overturn is actually an attempt to tie the issue to interstate commerce. Matters of interstate commerce are a federal thing so if they can get traction for saying the overturn adversely affects interstate commerce, then they can try to place the matter of abortion back under Federal jurisdiction. That's what I read, anyway, but I haven't seen that talk of economic stability continue in the last few days so maybe that idea never got off of the ground.

Originally Posted by Unboxxed

I have read that the several relatively recent instances of liberal Talking Heads all fearing, at the same time, economic instability as a result of the overturn is actually an attempt to tie the issue to interstate commerce. Matters of interstate commerce are a federal thing so if they can get traction for saying the overturn adversely affects interstate commerce, then they can try to place the matter of abortion back under Federal jurisdiction. That's what I read, anyway, but I haven't seen that talk of economic stability continue in the last few days so maybe that idea never got off of the ground.

They like to tie legal knots, their seamanship in this regard is second to none. Look how they tied us to incels, radical right wing white nationals, conservatives, then smeared a thick coat of domestic terrorist over the lot! We're like a basket of deplorables all lined up for assassination and incineration. Given the reigns, or stolen the reigns of power, they're the most dangerous people on earth and the single most outstanding unabated direct threat to this now infected, diseased, and dying republic.