Thread: All women are evil unpublished article

Guys I finally have some time to come here. I want to post an article by a colleague of mine which was barred from publishing g everywhere. SO if you wish read it and see what you think about NAWALT if you already do not have a concrete opinion. I personally find the article a piece of mind that should occupy every MGTOW man's mind.
https://unpublishedarticles.com/all-...entally-a-war/

Test of signature

Good article containing a lot of truth. I've a feeling the thread title and headline is going to attract attention from a particular member though.

Originally Posted by Jackoff

Good article containing a lot of truth. I've a feeling the thread title and headline is going to attract attention from a particular member though.

Like metal shavings, parts, rust, and pieces to a magnet being dragged through 100 year old scrap yard!

The law is from a time when women were not allowed to vote and were kept as chattels by their owners, their husbands.

An oft-told lie, and one that MGTOW and "meninists" need to recognise as such. Wives have never been chattels almost by definition. A wife has status. An owner owes a slave nothing; but it has always and everywhere been the case that husbands owe their wives support and protection - that the wife has a claim on the labour of her husband.

Women were never "chained to the kitchen". They were in the kitchen because it was the only place on earth that was always warm. It was kept that way by the husband bringing home the firewood.

Women have always been a net negative in their productive output vs consumption, which is why men stuck them anywhere that was safe and they could contribute SOMETHING to their survival and that of the family unit.

Originally Posted by Ithoughtshewas18ohms

Women have always been a net negative in their productive output vs consumption

A very sweeping statement.

I'm unsure of the "have always been" bit but it surely does seem to be the case in the last few centuries. Of course this also depends on how you measure "productivity".

Sarcasm follows:

Maybe we should create some sort of measurement criteria like the multinational companies with their quarterly returns and their metrics?

End of sarcasm.

Women can be very productive. A very few seek that productivity through traditional means - i.e. hard work and effort, but many more are productive by leeching off the accomplishments of a man.

Don't see this as being unproductive. They may not provide much in the way of resources but they are being very productive insofar as they are providing for themselves.

Does this antagonise? Well, how many companies would survive if they didn't exploit the efforts of their staff?

This is how most women see us men - a resource to be exploited.

Again I ask: How does one measure productivity?

Originally Posted by Ithoughtshewas18ohms

Women have always been a net negative in their productive output vs consumption, which is why men stuck them anywhere that was safe and they could contribute SOMETHING to their survival and that of the family unit.

"Always"? The social function of women historically has rarely risen beyond giving birth to and caring for children. Those were their designated roles in society. And for centuries, they largely did those things and not much else. Intellectual honesty demands that we acknowledge that giving birth to new life and then playing a central role in raising children is in no means a net negative. Women were essentially property back then. But they punched their weight and any other analysis is flawed and wrong, period.

However, the reason modern society is facing the troubles that it is has a lot to do with the fact that women now compete with men in things that tend to favor men. Now is when women have begun underperforming. Between welfare dollars, alimony, child support, phony make-work jobs combined with a declining fertility rate (or negative rate in some regions), voting for leftwing policies and destroying the nuclear family, women's consumption is beyond the tipping point. NOW they can be adequately summed up as a net negative on society. But historically, no, that's not who women were at all.