Thread: MrWalton

are homosexuals allowed to become members of this forum?
I thought MGTOW was straight guys only ...........

OP has clearly stated in 1. and 4. that's he's gay.
"have been in relationships with several men."
"I've been conscious of my desire for other men since my early teenage years."

Originally Posted by MrWalton

are homosexuals allowed to become members of this forum?
I thought MGTOW was straight guys only ...........

OP has clearly stated in 1. and 4. that's he's gay.
"have been in relationships with several men."
"I've been conscious of my desire for other men since my early teenage years."

Yes, gay men can refuse emotional relationships with women and Go Their Own Way. Keep in mind, there are men who did not identify as gay while they were with women. Many were married to women and had children but, even if not, gay men have their own battle scars from their interactions with women, even if the scars are not necessarily identical to those of straight men. Often, they are identical, since women are causing them. Including divorce-rape and child custody issues.

We have several members here who identify as gay.

Originally Posted by Unboxxed

Yes, gay men can refuse emotional relationships with women and Go Their Own Way. Keep in mind, there are men who did not identify as gay while they were with women. Many were married to women and had children but, even if not, gay men have their own battle scars from their interactions with women, even if the scars are not necessarily identical to those of straight men. Often, they are identical, since women are causing them. Including divorce-rape and child custody issues.

We have several members here who identify as gay.

Thanks for clarifying that matter.
While I have nothing in particular against gay men, I don't wish to participate in a forum (like this one) that is inclusive of them.
I wish you the very best with your forum, and suggest you remove me as a member.

Thanks, it was great being a part of it for the short time I was a member.

Member banned upon request.

Someone has a lot to learn. Homosexual men are not a monolith. When one considers how many gay men do associate emotionally with women, and defend women by supporting women's causes, and vote for female/feminist candidates, how can anyone have a problem with the relatively few who walk away from all that, in support of men's rights, especially when it's exactly what straight men have walked away from.

Recommended reading from Beijaflor, a self-acknowledged heterosexual: The New Gay Liberation by Matthew Lye. Start here to read what Beijaflor had to say:

https://www.goingyourownway.com/mgto...275/#post83275

Who cares? A motley crew is after all is a motley crew!

The only distinction I see? Are they still in need of a relationship with emotional bonds, spiritual clutter, and the missed goalposts that accompany such directives? That's where we differ, hard core MGTOW are a little different then hard cock dick feeding MGTOW, no matter what they feed their dicks!

I'm sure we even have goat fuckers in our congregation, does that mean I can relate to them? No, not on their sexual preference level, but like Unboxxed said, they are still men, and know the abuse we all endure from this fucked to hell society.

Go ahead, smoke a cock, fuck a goat, just spare me the details and we can get along like peas and carrots. My rhino skin gives me the ability to shed any beliefs that are not my own and to let people speak their minds in opposition to my beliefs.

I can give you 5 million reasons not to be gay, even more not to be married or in a relationshit with a modern empowered woman! After all, like men's lawyers, gay's lawyers are powerless over a woman's lawyer. Armed with this fact, I see being gay as the less of two evils!

Lets examine Mr. Walton's statement a while back, saying he rather fuck 15 to 25 yo instead of the 25 to 35's he can afford.

In his South China Sea costal paradise that's apparently acceptable, did any one of us call him out on it? NO! Why? Because we're not agents of the retrospective states we live in (another why?), because when a woman has sex with a minor, it's legally shrugged off as cute, adorable, and affectionate, but when a man does it, it's considered villainy, monstrous, aggressive, aggravating, horrendous, and inexcusable, he's sentenced to hard time where other prisoners mutually seek to destroy him, placing him in solitary confinement for his own protection, where 23 hours a day, every day, he's locked in his isolated cell on a ward with other isolated cells called "PC" (protected custody).

Now Mr. Walton has a moral objection about someone's sexual preference? A preference that's no doubt molded by the standing gender threats to his safety and personal liberty? Like stated above?

Find someone that's spent a decade in PC for being seduced by an under age woman, then move him into your house where the surrounding neighbors must be notified of his transgressions with a public database made just for him and others like him, and this jaded cloak will follow him to his grave. Because she was 15.

Well, maybe MrWalton didn't know about this, but the fact of the matter is, in some regards homosexuals are natural allies in the gender war. And oh yes, make no mistake about it, women are waging a war; they have been for the past.... 200,000 years?

Granted some homosexual men are extremely gynocentric, but, if a homosexual were to frequent this forum, and share his insights into female manipulation, then I welcome him with open arms.

They certainly are far preferable to TradCons, who're trying to shove a dying paradigm down our throats.

Originally Posted by Opaque

Well, maybe MrWalton didn't know about this, but the fact of the matter is, in some regards homosexuals are natural allies in the gender war. And oh yes, make no mistake about it, women are waging a war; they have been for the past.... 200,000 years?

Granted some homosexual men are extremely gynocentric, but, if a homosexual were to frequent this forum, and share his insights into female manipulation, then I welcome him with open arms.

They certainly are far preferable to TradCons, who're trying to shove a dying paradigm down our throats.

Open arms? I'd be worried about taking my hands off my trousers!

Originally Posted by mgtower

Lets examine Mr. Walton's statement a while back, saying he rather fuck 15 to 25 yo instead of the 25 to 35's he can afford.

I had to have a long think about my presence on the forum after he said that. Don't get me wrong, I think age-of-consent laws need a re-work to end that stupid scenario where a 17 y/o tells you she's 23, you fuck her, then the cops show up the minute she turns on you. But I cannot be associated with 60 y/o men saying they like to fuck 15 y/o's, that is the wrong hill to die on.

Originally Posted by LizardPerson

I had to have a long think about my presence on the forum after he said that. Don't get me wrong, I think age-of-consent laws need a re-work to end that stupid scenario where a 17 y/o tells you she's 23, you fuck her, then the cops show up the minute she turns on you. But I cannot be associated with 60 y/o men saying they like to fuck 15 y/o's, that is the wrong hill to die on.

I don't condone Caligula culture on any side of any coin, but I have enough sense to know western culture went through a moral blender dubbed the sexual revolution, the greatest cultural failure and we own it, lock, stock, and barrel!

MGTOW Monk is a suicide airbag for maximum protection in a cultural head-on collision! My freedom and range of intellectual movement is hindered by no one, everything is whatever I choose 24/7/365+ leap years! I'm allowed to say fuck-you to anything I don't like, and that's allot of fuck-you's!

Originally Posted by MrWalton

Thanks, it was great being a part of it for the short time I was a member.

I'm still thinking about this amazing statement. Rotating it around in my head.

It was great, he said! Don't tell him who around him is gay and he'll be fine. Otherwise, he'll run away. Nothing happened to him here, but his own thoughts.

He never ran into anything here. Nobody asked anything gay of him. Who was he worried about? We're typing on keyboards. Who connected him to the gay?

He did.

He indicated he cannot be virtually associated with guys who, like him, have been repelled by the gynocracy, ostensibly unless he approves of what makes them get hard.

Otherwise, it asks something from him that he cannot give. What, MGTOW camaraderie? No one has ever asked for more than that.

Ha, do I want to be with him in a foxhole shooting at our common enemy if he's got his mind on my body? It's a two-way complaint, that.

Maybe he thinks that gay MGTOW haven't paid their dues? That's uninformed thinking. Every member did an Intro here. I shouldn't even have to say "gay MGTOW".

In defense of MrWalton's views.

I grew up very tolerant of gays. I've had close gay friends. I've had gay room mates. I may or may not have "experimented" at some point. Nobody can call me a homophobe.

However, the older I get, the more I am a fan of ancient wisdom dating back to the earliest modern humans. They wrote about very advanced beings from other planets visiting Earth and seeding human life and culture. Consistently, these beings warned them about women and homosexuals, in almost all cultures. These beings all decided to leave at some point, after enough generations without seeing them, people stopped believing they ever existed, and began doubting the wisdom of the information they shared.

Gay men are a fun bunch of guys to hang out with, assuming you are OK with the fact that your dick will eventually get grabbed. Lesbians are kind of depressing. But if I had to rate the net impact of tolerance of homosexuality, I am not so sure that it is good. Men, being better at everything, also make better women. Check out Jeffree Star on Youtube. Narcissism, vanity and manipulation beyond any woman's wildest dreams. Women watch this guy and imitate his every move. Gay men have essentially amplified women and female nature. Tolerance of homosexuality was good intentions with unintended consequences at their finest.

Maybe those advanced beings from the sky were real and knew what they were talking about after all, even if we could not understand the reasons for the brutality they prescribed to us. In defense of the sky gods, they may also come from imperfect species and civilizations, it is naive to be angry at them for not creating us more perfect (even if having to deal with women is bullshit). They cared enough to start us off with some great advice. I'm inclined to believe that they love us and did the absolute best they could for us.