
Originally Posted by
happybachelor
Looks, game, money - you need two.
Always remember women need to feeeeeeel good. So if you're good looking she will feel good initially (cos of the status it affords her) but this will very quickly wear off if your personality doesn't make her feel good.
That's why ugly blokes who have that certain something that makes women feel good, are often successful. Could be wit, humour, or even just feeling 'safe' with him.
The other thing is women are completely confused as to what they want. That's cos they are easily programmable by the satanic elite.
Who really gives a fuck what women want, though?
A woman's mind is chaos. Fuck that shit.
Only if and when women start exhibiting good and moral behaviour en masse, will I start caring about their needs. So probably not in my lifetime then.
I'm cracking another beer and giving a middle fingered salute to all the wamens in the world.
I would say pre-2012 game was quite important. A lot of guys were naturally needy so it was quite refreshing for women to meet a stranger who was cocky funny with good banter. Nowadays a lot of people have read up on game, are not as needy and have started to think about opening lines/tactics for conversation, so game doesn't really set you apart anymore. I would say social status and looks are the most important, with looks having the highest weighting.
This isn't just taken out the hat..we all know guys with no game who get everywhere through looks alone. On online dating which is the most dominant form of meeting someone now, the studies have concluded that looks top everything. We used good looking guys who admitted raping babies, raping women, huge jail time for terrible crimes, the good looking guys recieved 100s of matches, the ugly guys recieved none. We used professionally made profiles for the ugly guys with good pictures, high social status..using jobs such as Airline Pilot and lawyer yet couldn't find a real match that led to a date.
Definitely not saying game is null. We also used good looking women pretending to be men on ugly guys dating profiles. You would think women would know what women want to hear? Think again.. this female was LESS successful than a ugly guy with good game. It seems personality is not really accounting for much. Game is *expected*, You're expected to play things 100% or you'll just be ghosted unless in the top 15%. The rate of error is determined by your looks. We used ''K'' responses to women on online dating and found the female thirst was still there. You can imagine a graph.. the better looking you are the more you can get away with. If you use top 15% pictures you can just talk sex straight away and they are up for meeting (a lot but not all)
Interestingly, some good women do message the ugly guys (once in a blue moon) but 95% ghosted after the first 3 messages. This tells me the margin for error was set pretty damn high. I think also some women like to think looks are not everything so they message a guy they're not attracted to physically, then kind of backwards engineer it that it was the mans fault it never went any further. Also interesting to note Jeffy the RSD instructor, I believe in the 2013 period, he struggled to meet women on online dating apps, even though apparently had the best game out there at the time commercially. Some women quoted him using opening lines like ''Want to step inside my rape van?''
One thing I know for sure is if women actually got some first hand experience what dating is like for an average guy on the dating market, we might actually start seeing a change in attitudes.
This is mostly info for bachelors. My personal ratio of response is 5% which is not actually too bad, although the margin for error is set quite high. So evidently i Stay well away from dating apps.