Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 27
  1. #1
    Senior Member Latinus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Somewhere in Latin America. Ay!
    Posts
    229
    Reputation
    1037
    Type
    Unquiet Bachelor

    The future of men/women relationships

    Well men, I am not accessing this forum in these days because I am too busy in my new job in a hospital, surrounded mostly by women: female patients, doctors, nurses, receptionists and, of course, my boss. It's a battlefield, but I am surviving well.

    So, I was thinking if we can make a forecast about how men/women relationships will be in the future.

    In the past, the relationships were simply focused in marriage: a man married to a woman, they had many children and that is all till their deaths. And men and women had different roles in society. You know.

    Of course, I am talking about traditional western relationships, but there are many other kinds of traditional relationships, some of them are even polygamous, like in some islamic countries.

    Today, in modern western society, marriage is becoming more and more rare. And today, more and more relationships in the west are based in a "independent woman" that marry a moron mangina that will be her slave.

    But what if more and more men take the red pill? What kind of male/female relationship will prevail in the future? Will marriage become even more rare? Or more people will back to the traditional western marriage? Or will prevail a new kind of "marriage"? Will people will do less and less sex? Or more and more sex? People will have even less children? But, even so, who will take care of children? People will live more alone in their own houses? Or will they live in their parent's houses till adult age? In the daily life, will men and women live more together or will they live more and more separated?

    How do you think relationships will work in the future? And more: how do you think male/female relationships should work definitely?
    Last edited by Latinus; July 18, 2015 at 1:24 AM.
    Latin American... 28 y.o... living in Rio... spreading MGTOW... going my own way.

  2. #2

    Re: The future of men/women relationships

    I look at Western Europe for a view of North America's short term future. Less marriage, fewer births. The population levels will keep growing, but only because of immigration of people who have maintained more traditional male/female relationships, and given the higher standards of living in North America, will have 4,5, and even 6 child families, especially given the welfare state benefits. In 30 years, when it is painfully obvious that brown workers are paying for the social security of white senior citizens, they will vote for the end of social security.

    In terms of male and female relations, if men will not marry women because they realize it is a minefield with no map, women will push for a role for the Nanny State. Instead of "get the government out of our bedrooms," women will invite them in. The "civil union" concept will dusted off in to regulate relationships that do not rise to the level of marriage. For example, in some EU countries, live-in couples can get legally recognized, and subject the man to the local version of the shark tank that is divorce/family court.

    (Someone please find the Dilbert cartoon where the shortage of work cubicles forced Dilbert to have to double up. He objected until he realized that a beautiful latina would be sharing his computer by sitting on his lap. However, when she got her own cube at the end of the week, a lawyer showed up, took most of Dilbert's stuff in the split up, and even asked him "Are you sure that you had both of those eyebrows before you met my client?"

    In a bizarre interpretation of Plato's Republic, women will be offered the option of all the joys of motherhood, with little of responsibilities. The nanny state will provide almost round the clock child care so women can pretend to have careers, but spend 2 hours of "quality time" with "their" child a few times of the week, so that being a mother becomes a status symbol and does not interfere with women living up to their full potential" .....as tax payers. Remember, it takes a village (of government bureaucrats) to indoctrinate a child.

    Science might advance to the point that surrogate motherhood will be as common as divorce. Many third world women are available as brood mares.

    I think some concepts about relationships can be found in the novel, "Logan's Run."

  3. #3
    Senior Member ATLien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    493
    Reputation
    1519
    Type
    Bachelor

    Re: The future of men/women relationships

    Once the US is more like Greece, it's going to wind up being a matter of finance. Since women flooded the workplace, it drove down salary growth (more supply = cheaper labor) for decades... where once (mid-50s) a single income earner was enough for a decent living, now you really need two earners in a household to maintain the same standard of living. Keep in mind along the way we've added to the standard of living: cable tv, cellphone for everyone, flatscreen upgrade every few years, PC upgrade every few years, etc... income growth just hasn't kept up. Once the federal debt bubble pops, singles will be nearly forced to live together to stay afloat.
    My opinions are not necessarily my opinions.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Octavian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Four Dimensional Spacetime.
    Posts
    1,248
    Reputation
    8547

    Re: The future of men/women relationships

    Quote Originally Posted by Latinus View Post
    Well men, I am not accessing this forum in these days because I am too busy in my new job in a hospital, surrounded mostly by women: female patients, doctors, nurses, receptionists and, of course, my boss. It's a battlefield, but I am surviving well.

    So, I was thinking if we can make a forecast about how men/women relationships will be in the future.

    In the past, the relationships were simply focused in marriage: a man married to a woman, they had many children and that is all till their deaths. And men and women had different roles in society. You know.

    Of course, I am talking about traditional western relationships, but there are many other kinds of traditional relationships, some of them are even polygamous, like in some islamic countries.

    Today, in modern western society, marriage is becoming more and more rare. And today, more and more relationships in the west are based in a "independent woman" that marry a moron mangina that will be her slave.

    But what if more and more men take the red pill? What kind of male/female relationship will prevail in the future? Will marriage become even more rare? Or more people will back to the traditional western marriage? Or will prevail a new kind of "marriage"? Will people will do less and less sex? Or more and more sex? People will have even less children? But, even so, who will take care of children? People will live more alone in their own houses? Or will they live in their parent's houses till adult age? In the daily life, will men and women live more together or will they live more and more separated?

    How do you think relationships will work in the future? And more: how do you think male/female relationships should work definitely?
    Im no Issac Asimov, so bear that in mind when reading this.

    Personally, I think marriage will go the way of the mechanical typewriter.Some folks of certain religious or traditional socieities & families thereof will do so, but for the most part it'll fade into history.

    As others have noted marriage is becoming obsolete, although IMO the pressure will come from females vs males. There arent enough unplugged men to make a dent in the matriarchy- for every committed man who leaves the system ten more become shackled to it.Rather women will be so disgusted by the spineless fem-dudes their moms created that they'll be repulsed at the notion of shacking up with any 'guy'.I live in a rural area of America and am amazed at the general feminized nature and thinking of average guys nowadays.Forget about urban cities. At times walking through and interacting with people in LA made me feel like I was Don Draper time travelling to 2015.Why the hell would a female shack up with a dude who knows less about a car motor and spends more time in the bathroom prepping then she does?

    "Money,duh" you might say in response.
    But you dont need a marriage to do that.A simple cohab arrangement is enough in many places, and fairly soon the governments of the world will get hip to the fact that the dudes who dont have women in their lives have a LOT of disposable income . If 80% of the dudes in society are unattached beta males with no kids and no wife, fairly soon someone's gonna realize taxing those guys will pay for a lot of Mr Thundercock's progeny.

    Thats how things went in ancient Rome, and thats how things are likely to play out for us.We'll be served with a summons to present proof of gay marriage ,alimony expenses paid ,a court order for child support or a documented relationship with a female....or pay a 40% income tax until we do.The reason?

    "All men should share the burden to pay for child support, because patriarchy.Whats more important-a kid or your classic 1965 Mustang restoration?"

    At first to sell the "Bachelor Tax" theyll apply it to females as a gesture of "equal burden", but that'll be a non-binding price ceiling. They'll find a beta to happily vouch for being in a relationship so she can dodge the taxman, who wont be encouraged to enforce female recievables due anyways .

    Meanwhile , we single dudes will be looking over our shoulders every time we use an ATM.Next floor in the elevator of decline after that is polyamory-ive already seen a few examples of this in LA.One woman in a relationship with a harem of dudes who exclusively 'date' her in return.

    The financial squeeze will justify part of this. Want to dodge the 40% bachelor tax, Mister Bluepill? Go find a bored fat girl who's willing to vouch for you to the IRS that you're a taken man.Of course nothing is free in this world......and you'll have to prove to Miss Fatso you have the commitment required to join her roster.

    As for the alpha's, itll be a lonely club-moving between harems means pissing off a few women. Itll be the lowest social category of public society; staying out of jail & poverty will mean fake ID's and quick feet.Plate spinning for males will require CIA tradecraft to avoid imprisonment.

    I hope we dont suffer a Big Collapse ; the only thing worse then living in a matriarchy is wandering a post-industrial disaster filled with desperate bluepill males ,ruthless whores ,and easy accessed personal weapons with no law or order.You think guys are thirsty simps NOW....just wait until a society of feminized she-dudes have to figure out how to live without Amazon Prime and extended warranties. Just remember-most forms of pornography require electricity to work. As does the production of birth control.

  5. #5
    Super Moderator Mr Wombat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    4,394
    Reputation
    19909
    Type
    Neutral

    Re: The future of men/women relationships

    Quote Originally Posted by sam luis obispo View Post
    I look at Western Europe for a view of North America's short term future. Less marriage, fewer births.
    Less marriage, fewer births, more outsourcing.

    Manufacturing outsourced to China. Service outsourced to India. You know it makes sense!

    But the fatal, fatal step that empires make in the end is to outsource defence. When that happens, the empire will collapse within a generation.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Insidious_Sid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    2,333
    Reputation
    19834
    Type
    Ghost

    Re: The future of men/women relationships

    Governments will continue to become more socialist because more women will vote, and women need socialist governments to pay for their whore spawn. The reason they don't care that beta's are leaving the plantation is because they see how women are propped up and taken care of. The alpha's (who they only want to fuck) are either not good marriage material or want nothing to do with it - so the women don't want marriage anyways. Marriage was just a pain in the ass for women - they did it as a means to and end, that end being a mans wallet. Now they access ALL men's wallets through the state.

    There will be a tax war. Men saying "fuck it" will continue to be taxed more and more to pay for more and more bastard alpha babies. Governments will continue to create more insidious ways of getting men to pay for children that are not theirs. They will also bring in more immigrants from the most vile sewers of the world to get the vote from yet more.... socialist-dependent individuals. Impoverished immigrants with language barriers and barriers to the workforce are sheep - they will vote in droves for the governments that pander to them the most. Governments know they don't need marriages or babies from marriages. They can import voters from every corner of the earth.

    Economies will crumble - women are actually waiting for this. They believe in the lies of the feminist utopia, where the rich white men at the top of the towers fall to their deaths, the towers topple and gold spills into the streets for everyone to plunder. They have no real knowledge of what the real repercussions of this will be - they think it will be handsome alphas fucking all the women while betas toil in the mines and obediently pay their taxes.

    That's not what is going to happen. Before it's all over they will say "Oh no, what have we done?!"

    These cries will fall on deaf ears.
    - Feminism is Cancer.
    - Where have all the good men gone? Away. Far far away... from you.
    - NAWALT? Maybe, but EWALT means Russian Roulette is a much safer bet...

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Folsom, California
    Posts
    504
    Reputation
    1386
    Type
    Ghost

    Re: The future of men/women relationships

    Quote Originally Posted by Latinus View Post
    What kind of male/female relationship will prevail in the future?
    That's a very hard question to answer with any kind of accuracy even if you specified what future you are talking about. Without specifying what future, it's almost impossible to answer. So, let me ask the following question instead: What kind of male/female relationship will prevail in 2050 ?

    People who will be 50 then, who will be at the height of their power and motivation to effect change, are 15 now. A larger proportion of them will be either red pill or purple pill than people who are 50 now, who didn't have access to the internet when they were 15. That means a larger proportion of single men, and, more importantly, a larger proportion of those single men will have decided in their teens to remain single, and never wavered from their decision. Hopefully, that means a larger proportion of men will pursue their passion instead of workhorse careers such as accountant, and more overall happiness for men.

    Technologically, there will be sex robots. One question is, what legislation feminist, manginas and white knights will pass in the West to make land whales more competitive with robots. Maybe some sex robot 1,000% tax to provide income for single land whales and their thug spawn. Or just outlawing it, like they outlawed prostitution in the most of the US, to remove competition for wives who have nothing to bring to the table but sex.

    Politically, the world will probably be divided into two. A mostly feminist and feminized West, and a huge Islamic State (probably run by a different ideology than ISIS). The West will have a higher average IQ, and higher percentage of the population with IQ over 130. Those are the people who enable high economic growth when they have an incentive to do so. The West will also have less incentive for many of those 130+ IQ people to make money (since half of it would be syphoned off to the land whales and their thug spawns). Many of those 130+ IQ people in the West will pursue technically challenging but economically low impact careers such as mathematics and theoretical physics. This has been demonstrated in communist soviet union, which has a big proportion of mathematicians and physicists. Since they knew they were going to have about the same standard of living whether they pursued their own passion regardless of economic impact, or economically useful careers, a bigger proportion of smart people in USSR chose to pursue their own passion (compared to the proportion in capitalist countries).

    The Islamic State will have lower average IQ, a dire need for 130+ IQ people to grow its economy. But a better tax structure. Hopefully, only about a 2.5% wealth tax (mandated by Islam), a protection tax for non Muslims, and no income tax. If the Islamic State plays its hand right, it can attract many of the 130+ IQ betas with its better tax structure, and the availability of better quality women, and, last but not least, permission to manspread in the subway cars that they have themselves built.

    In the Islamic State part, the relationships between men and women will mostly be marriage. In the West, probably women fucking alphas, then getting income from the government to raise their kids. Many fewer marriages, since the Beta Bucks of the Alpha Fucks Beta Bucks equation will have been even more fully institutionalized by the Western governments.

    Imagine the following commercial by the Islamic State: Hey you ! ... Yes, you, the computer nerd. Wants sex ? Come live in the Islamic State.

    And that would be a truthful ad. In the Islamic State, the beta will get all the sex he pays for (pays for by supporting a wife and her children). In the West, you still pay for it (with 50% taxes), but you won't get it.
    Last edited by Abdenour; July 18, 2015 at 7:22 AM. Reason: Spelling

  8. #8
    Senior Member Primus_Pilus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,095
    Reputation
    5095
    Type
    Supervillain

    Re: The future of men/women relationships

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Wombat View Post
    But the fatal, fatal step that empires make in the end is to outsource defence. When that happens, the empire will collapse within a generation.
    Your timetable is too optimistic.
    http://www.westernjournalism.com/oba...into-military/
    We're already trading citizenship for military service with legal immigrants.
    First date: A job interview in which a slot-c tries to determine a man's financial suitability in relation to its desire for children.
    Oxytocin, more dangerous than heroin.
    I am not going to sacrifice my freedom and wealth for your ideals.
    If she isn't fucking you like a porn star she is fucking someone else like one.

    Women, they're just a bag of bricks. All you gotta do is set them down. - Primus Milton

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Folsom, California
    Posts
    504
    Reputation
    1386
    Type
    Ghost

    Re: The future of men/women relationships

    Quote Originally Posted by Primus_Pilus View Post
    Your timetable is too optimistic.
    http://www.westernjournalism.com/oba...into-military/
    We're already trading citizenship for military service with legal immigrants.
    Actually, legal immigrants would get citizenship anyways after 3 or 5 years if they don't commit a certain kind of crimes in the mean time. The military service only shortens that to one year. So, it's just an accelerated path to citizenship instead of the the regular path.

    It's France who grants citizenship in exchange for military service through the foreign legion. You can sneak in through the border, show up at the foreign legion headquarters undocumented, and, if you are selected, pass the tests and serve a couple of years, you become eligible for French citizenship.

  10. #10

    Re: The future of men/women relationships

    The Islamic State will have lower average IQ, a dire need for 130+ IQ people to grow its economy. But a better tax structure. Hopefully, only about a 2.5% wealth tax (mandated by Islam), a protection tax for non Muslims, and no income tax. If the Islamic State plays its hand right, it can attract many of the 130+ IQ betas with its better tax structure, and the availability of better quality women, and, last but not least, permission to manspread in the subway cars that they have themselves built.
    This is already happening at least in Canada (and perhaps even other first-world socialist nations). I have been meeting up and talking with lot of people when I travel abroad (USA, Singapore, Middle East, and other parts of S.E Asia) and reading travel blogs and the story is the same. They say alot of Canadians have immigrated to to the above mentioned places to make loads of mullah. The only reason they come back is to raise a family. As more and more professionally qualified men remain single you are going to see more and more of them staying abroad and not coming back. In fact I'd even wager they'd toss their Canadian citizenship in the garbage. If the USA become every bit feminist and socialist as the rest of the west, then ALL the qualified professional white men will be moving abroad and the West will fast go the way of the USSR and become a third world dump.

    P.S: I can assure you WILL make loads of money especially in Middle East if you have a Western (has to be western) STEM field degree and experience. My muslim friend got out of school and went straight to S. Arabia to work (thx to his dad being in a senior position) and got 6-figure salary right off the bat. He also has no student debt and by the end of this year he will have enough to put a 20%-50% down-payment on a decent home at the age of 25 after only working for 1 year because S. Arabian gov't and company pays for all his necessities and basic luxuries. Fuck the west.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Up North Tabarnak
    Posts
    508
    Reputation
    2129
    Type
    Natural Neutral

    Re: The future of men/women relationships

    Quote Originally Posted by Octavian View Post
    Im no Issac Asimov, so bear that in mind when reading this.

    ...

    I hope we dont suffer a Big Collapse ; the only thing worse then living in a matriarchy is wandering a post-industrial disaster filled with desperate bluepill males ,ruthless whores ,and easy accessed personal weapons with no law or order.You think guys are thirsty simps NOW....just wait until a society of feminized she-dudes have to figure out how to live without Amazon Prime and extended warranties. Just remember-most forms of pornography require electricity to work. As does the production of birth control.
    Amen to that. In the future you outlined I'd have to become some kind of warlord to enjoy the same peace I have now.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Up North Tabarnak
    Posts
    508
    Reputation
    2129
    Type
    Natural Neutral

    Re: The future of men/women relationships

    If I had to call it I'd say that the future is ok for the next 5 years or so then a massive decline. There will either be a big global war like WW3 or a financial crash that wipes out global markets. After that shock the only people who will have jobs are the ones working in agriculture, oil production/exploration and manufacturing. Most of the useless make work paper shuffling jobs are likely to disappear. Gov'ts will likely fall in size. The country that is probably the best template of our future in the west is Greece. This may result in more female unemployment since they're mostly in clerical positions that are easily downsized.

    How this will affect men and women? Well alot less kids, more single men and women. Alot less white knights though since they will likely be burnt out from all their current pandering.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    99
    Reputation
    393

    Re: The future of men/women relationships

    The path of least resistance will still remain marriage but one child families will become far more common. Marriages will become more economic partnerships than any BS to do with "Luurve". As ATlien says it's already virtually a necessity to have two incomes to purchase property these days. Inherited wealth will increasingly replace earned wealth from employment, and it's likely we'll see a form of dowry payments accompanying marriage, say for example the bride's parents might give the couple a block of land to build a house on.

    Both males and females with low SMV will increasingly be overlooked for marriage and will remain childless, low earning men know they can't afford a family while less attractive women will be simply ignored by the decreasing number of men that do want a wife and kids.

    Whatever happens there'll be no going back to the 1950's model of a male breadwinner while the wife stays home to raise the kids. My mother has probably done the equivalent of two or three years full time paid work, whereas my wife's closing in on 15 years - as is my sister (married with kids). The vast majority of female co-workers continue to work two or three days a week even after having children.

  14. #14
    Moderator Thomas Covenant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Freeedoooom!
    Posts
    1,964
    Reputation
    6778
    Type
    Neutral

    Re: The future of men/women relationships

    Whatever happens there'll be no going back to the 1950's model of a male breadwinner while the wife stays home to raise the kids
    Of course. That period was a short aberration fueled by massive borrowing. The government was hosing people with the free stuff and actually believed full employment was possible. And all this before people had a chance to get lazy and accustomed to welfare, with all the problems that brings. Keynesianism works brilliantly for about 20 years at a time - until the effects of all the falsely allocated money begin to be felt. It's where stagflation comes from.

    Before the 50's, most households needed a dual income to survive.
    I work in financial planning. I am interested in metal (all kinds), miniature painting and PC gaming. I live in Scotland.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Dubya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    213
    Reputation
    1080
    Type
    Bachelor

    Re: The future of men/women relationships

    In the past all a girl needed was her virginity, she was set for life with her Mrs degree.

    In the past all a guy needed was a job to be married for life.

    The economy is such that you can't support a family on 1 income anymore.

    Women have to work now, it's not optional.

    And marriages are alot less stable because she doesn't need you to support herself.

    This is not as bad as it sounds really, because if both of you are working and divorce takes half, then theoretically you shouldn't lose anything.

    It sometimes doesn't work out that way in practice but it's still better than to have a SAHM take half.

    I've been lucky

    My first marriage didn't cost anything

    And I've had about 5 serious girlfriends/cohabs that didn't cost me anything.

    But I've been attracted to career women, girls who could support themselves, I never dated anyone who didn't at least have a job.

    And I think that's the future of women and relationships.

    That women have to have jobs.

    And maybe relationships don't last your whole life.

    And maybe I'm ok with that. I mean, I've been in love a few times and it felt great, but sometimes it's just time to move on, it's best to just part as friends and say "Thank you for the time we had" and just on to the next girl.

    Right now I live alone.

    And I'm not depressed or lonely, in fact I feel great.

    It took me a LONG time to be ok with how things are now.

    And I'm not sure I can express why but I'll give it a shot.

    It's this feeling that I am awesome, and that everybody else is awesome too, I'm not "entitled" to anything from anybody but I am entitled to be part of humanity, I'm part of the human "tribe" hence I am entitled to seek intimacy and warmth, girls aren't attracted to me because I'm the hottest stud on the planet, they're attracted to me because I'm a guy, and we're part of the same human tribe and this is what girls and guys do, and so I just "assume" attraction and more often than not it happens. Incidentally I think "ugly" girls are entitled to seek intimacy and warmth too and I'm not judgemental. I just think looks are overrated and everybody can doll themselves up if they put time and effort into it. I don't consider myself good looking either, so this gives me permission to approach women and talk to them.

    Given the above paragraph I could easily spend all my free time with women but I want more out of life than just that.

    I want to have adventures and plenty of cash and hobbies and health and time to enjoy finer things, my dream is to spend 6 months living in a hut by the beach, fish and hike and live off the land, with a stack of great books to read, and at night go to a dive bar, drink and chat, and enjoy company. If the occaisional woman wants to sleep with me, I'll indulge it but it's not my main focus in life.

    If I was in burgerland in the 1950's, I'd have to be home all the time doing errands, I wouldn't be free to live how I want.

    Divorce was the best thing that ever happened to me.

    I tapped that ass and it was NICE but thank GOD she's gone.

  16. #16
    Senior Member Insidious_Sid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    2,333
    Reputation
    19834
    Type
    Ghost

    Re: The future of men/women relationships

    Dubya said "Women have to work now, it's not optional."

    Yeah, they left the horrible household and went to work, almost doubling the family income.
    Then the price of everything doubled. Ooops.

    Huh. Didn't see THAT coming, did they?
    - Feminism is Cancer.
    - Where have all the good men gone? Away. Far far away... from you.
    - NAWALT? Maybe, but EWALT means Russian Roulette is a much safer bet...

  17. #17
    Senior Member Octavian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Four Dimensional Spacetime.
    Posts
    1,248
    Reputation
    8547

    Re: The future of men/women relationships

    Quote Originally Posted by Insidious_Sid View Post
    Dubya said "Women have to work now, it's not optional."

    Yeah, they left the horrible household and went to work, almost doubling the family income.
    Then the price of everything doubled. Ooops.

    Huh. Didn't see THAT coming, did they?
    The nuances of modern 'two income' households don't match the textbook reality.

    The theory ; two incomes on one shared set of living expenses equals greater wealth generation and savings potential. Businesses use that principle all the time to save costs when two industries can share one building, pipeline, etc.

    The theory breaks down when we consider exactly WHO is calling the financial shots. If males were the legal and material heads of households it would be a different story. But realistically it is the female who decides what happens in any family unit today.

    So rather then two incomes being spent on one set of necessary bills, both incomes are being blown out as extra bullshit spending on Mary Kay , Advocare , luxury cars (honey why is my brand new Range Rover not starting ??!!Come pick me up in your 15 year old Taurus ! ) , and shoes which go out of style before the receipt even leaves the printer.

    Casual observation of my previous and current employers reveals I , despite having only my own income, always have greater disposable money then the two income couples despite the latter making more net then I do.

  18. #18
    Senior Member flailer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Here, There, Most Anywwhere
    Posts
    811
    Reputation
    2670

    Re: The future of men/women relationships

    EXCELLENT! I believe you left off that all (romantic) relationships will be short term ONLY ~

    Quote Originally Posted by Dubya View Post
    In the past all a girl needed was her virginity, she was set for life with her Mrs degree.

    In the past all a guy needed was a job to be married for life.

    The economy is such that you can't support a family on 1 income anymore.

    Women have to work now, it's not optional.

    And marriages are alot less stable because she doesn't need you to support herself.

    This is not as bad as it sounds really, because if both of you are working and divorce takes half, then theoretically you shouldn't lose anything.

    It sometimes doesn't work out that way in practice but it's still better than to have a SAHM take half.

    I've been lucky

    My first marriage didn't cost anything

    And I've had about 5 serious girlfriends/cohabs that didn't cost me anything.

    But I've been attracted to career women, girls who could support themselves, I never dated anyone who didn't at least have a job.

    And I think that's the future of women and relationships.

    That women have to have jobs.

    And maybe relationships don't last your whole life.

    And maybe I'm ok with that. I mean, I've been in love a few times and it felt great, but sometimes it's just time to move on, it's best to just part as friends and say "Thank you for the time we had" and just on to the next girl.

    Right now I live alone.

    And I'm not depressed or lonely, in fact I feel great.

    It took me a LONG time to be ok with how things are now.

    And I'm not sure I can express why but I'll give it a shot.

    It's this feeling that I am awesome, and that everybody else is awesome too, I'm not "entitled" to anything from anybody but I am entitled to be part of humanity, I'm part of the human "tribe" hence I am entitled to seek intimacy and warmth, girls aren't attracted to me because I'm the hottest stud on the planet, they're attracted to me because I'm a guy, and we're part of the same human tribe and this is what girls and guys do, and so I just "assume" attraction and more often than not it happens. Incidentally I think "ugly" girls are entitled to seek intimacy and warmth too and I'm not judgemental. I just think looks are overrated and everybody can doll themselves up if they put time and effort into it. I don't consider myself good looking either, so this gives me permission to approach women and talk to them.

    Given the above paragraph I could easily spend all my free time with women but I want more out of life than just that.

    I want to have adventures and plenty of cash and hobbies and health and time to enjoy finer things, my dream is to spend 6 months living in a hut by the beach, fish and hike and live off the land, with a stack of great books to read, and at night go to a dive bar, drink and chat, and enjoy company. If the occaisional woman wants to sleep with me, I'll indulge it but it's not my main focus in life.

    If I was in burgerland in the 1950's, I'd have to be home all the time doing errands, I wouldn't be free to live how I want.

    Divorce was the best thing that ever happened to me.

    I tapped that ass and it was NICE but thank GOD she's gone.
    Last edited by flailer; July 20, 2015 at 6:49 PM.
    If misery loves company; Happiness requires Bachelorhood

    p.s. i resent being a "senior member" - I'm not that old, or am I?

  19. #19

    Re: The future of men/women relationships

    Quote Originally Posted by Insidious_Sid View Post
    Dubya said "Women have to work now, it's not optional."

    Yeah, they left the horrible household and went to work, almost doubling the family income.
    Then the price of everything doubled. Ooops.

    Huh. Didn't see THAT coming, did they?
    And when the feminist/statist politicians didn't index the tax rates to inflation, the taxes they paid tripled.

  20. #20
    Moderator Thomas Covenant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Freeedoooom!
    Posts
    1,964
    Reputation
    6778
    Type
    Neutral

    Re: The future of men/women relationships

    Fiscal drag sam, fiscal drag.

    If you have an inheritance tax in the 60's, it only hits the landed wealthy. If you keep the same threshold until, I don't know, 2015, it starts hitting ordinary people.

    Then, if the conservative party wants to increase the threshold to allow some people to escape the net - you can criticise them for favouring the rich!

    The other secret tax I really wished everyone could understand is inflation. You know, the reason you get an annual pay rise.
    I work in financial planning. I am interested in metal (all kinds), miniature painting and PC gaming. I live in Scotland.


Similar Threads

  1. Red Pill relationships with women
    By DanLimitless in forum Lounge
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: April 9, 2015, 11:14 AM
  2. Relationships with women: Disappointment
    By Quant in forum Lounge
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: March 21, 2015, 5:59 PM
  3. Replies: 67
    Last Post: October 6, 2014, 2:07 PM
  4. Replies: 58
    Last Post: September 1, 2014, 8:02 PM
  5. The Future of Women in a MGTOW Society
    By BeijaFlor in forum Lounge
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: March 24, 2014, 1:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •